linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>,
	Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:23:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c592379-104d-8975-4385-9778f23cda56@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUkR84sklj0SgosC@google.com>

On 2021/9/21 6:57, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2021/9/11 7:13, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Wait. Why do we need to add so many options here? I was expecting to see
>>> performance difference when getting random segments or random blocks as
>>> an extreme case. I don't get the point why we need the middle of those cases.
>>
>> I guess we can simply the aging test procedure of filesystem by changing a bit
>> based on this patch.
> 
> My question was on "fragment:fixed_block".

This mode can be used for below filesystem aging scenario.

Fragmenting filesystem with specified pattern:
1M chunk | 1M hole | 1M chunk | 1M hole | ...

e.g.

Before
1. create/write 10 1M files: file0 file1 file2 ... file9
2. remove file1 file3 file5 ... file9

After
mode=fragment:fixed_block
fragment_chunk_size=1M
fragment_hole_size=1M
1. create/write one 10M file

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> See comments in below thread.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/425daf77-8020-26ce-dc9f-019d9a881b78@kernel.org/
>>
>> Thanks,

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 17:24 [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option Daeho Jeong
2021-09-02 23:57 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-09-03 20:33   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-04  3:33     ` Chao Yu
2021-09-04  4:40       ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-04  6:45         ` Chao Yu
2021-09-07 18:12           ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-09 23:50             ` Chao Yu
2021-09-10 14:34               ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-10 15:24                 ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-11 10:42                   ` Chao Yu
2021-09-10 23:13 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-11 23:45   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-09-20 22:57     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-22 15:23       ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c592379-104d-8975-4385-9778f23cda56@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).