A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about.

A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux distribution:

Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
An Available Source Operating System.
Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.

Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome

Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest latency, 
minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.

Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.

Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.

Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, but how 
does it sound?

Peace,
Ywe Cærlyn.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux distribution:
>
> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
> An Available Source Operating System.
> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>
> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>
> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest latency, 
> minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>
> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>
> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>
> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, but 
> how does it sound?
>
> Peace,
> Ywe Cærlyn.

I have made a good logo 
aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux distribution:
>>
>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>> An Available Source Operating System.
>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>
>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>
>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest latency, 
>> minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>
>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>
>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>>
>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, but 
>> how does it sound?
>>
>> Peace,
>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>
> I have made a good logo 
> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
>
I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone is 
their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance, youtube. And 
gets the income from this. Which makes a finely granulated internet economy.

A test channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q

Peace,
Ywe Cærlyn.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux distribution:
>>>
>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>
>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>
>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest latency, 
>>> minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>
>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>
>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>>>
>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, but 
>>> how does it sound?
>>>
>>> Peace,
>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>
>> I have made a good logo 
>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
>>
> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone 
> is their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance, 
> youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a finely 
> granulated internet economy.
>
> A test channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>
> Peace,
> Ywe Cærlyn.
>
With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about / Suggestion for changes in GNU Licence.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>> distribution:
>>>>
>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>
>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>
>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>
>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>
>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>>>>
>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, 
>>>> but how does it sound?
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>
>>> I have made a good logo 
>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
>>>
>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone 
>> is their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance, 
>> youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a finely 
>> granulated internet economy.
>>
>> A test channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>
>> Peace,
>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>
> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>
So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics comes 
from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it back, I would 
suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", and "free software" 
to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, and needs to have a 
corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer 
variables in GNU code... ). This is also based on on my conclusion on 
philosophy research over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And 
even metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this, 
maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will now not 
only be free, but make money. ;)

Peace.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about / Suggestion for changes in GNU Licence.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>
>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>
>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>>>>>
>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, 
>>>>> but how does it sound?
>>>>>
>>>>> Peace,
>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>
>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
>>>>
>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone 
>>> is their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance, 
>>> youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a finely 
>>> granulated internet economy.
>>>
>>> A test channel: 
>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>
>>> Peace,
>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>
>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>
> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it back, I 
> would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", and "free 
> software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, and needs to 
> have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding uneccesary 
> pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based on on my 
> conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that things need 
> to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard 
> Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The 
> hacker will now not only be free, but make money. ;)
>
> Peace.
>
>
>
Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he did 
not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.

|
|[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
|[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
|[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]|
|
|It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
|it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
|none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
|give us equal mention.
|
|See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
|https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
|https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
|
|--
|Dr Richard Stallman
|President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
|Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
|Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
|
And-

|
|[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
|[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
|[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
|
|"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
|source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
|However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
|include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
|
|Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
|freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
|so it would not communicate what we want to say.
|
|
|--
|Dr Richard Stallman
|President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
|Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
|Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
|

Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed if it 
chokes its own success?

To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains shall 
fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier and god, he 
slaves to.

Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the decision?

How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC C, 
and the original unix hacking?

Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, 
>>>>>> but how does it sound?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
>>>>>
>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone 
>>>> is their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance, 
>>>> youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a finely 
>>>> granulated internet economy.
>>>>
>>>> A test channel: 
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>
>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>
>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it back, I 
>> would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", and "free 
>> software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, and needs to 
>> have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding uneccesary 
>> pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based on on my 
>> conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that things need 
>> to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard 
>> Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The 
>> hacker will now not only be free, but make money. ;)
>>
>> Peace.
>>
>>
>>
> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he did 
> not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
> 
> |
> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]|
> |
> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
> |give us equal mention.
> |
> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
> |
> |--
> |Dr Richard Stallman
> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
> |
> And-
> 
> |
> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> |
> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
> |
> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
> |
> |
> |--
> |Dr Richard Stallman
> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
> |
> 
> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed if it 
> chokes its own success?
> 
> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains shall 
> fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier and god, he 
> slaves to.
> 
> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the decision?
> 
> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC C, 
> and the original unix hacking?
> 
> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
> 

As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going to 
go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.

For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected phase 
plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and parallel 
on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A further 
developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with similar 
sound of input and output.

Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.

I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.

Peace.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
>>>>>>> attitude.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet, 
>>>>>>> but how does it sound?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
>>>>> finely granulated internet economy.
>>>>>
>>>>> A test channel: 
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>>
>>>>> Peace,
>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>
>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>>
>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it back, 
>>> I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", and 
>>> "free software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, and 
>>> needs to have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding 
>>> uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based on 
>>> on my conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that 
>>> things need to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I 
>>> also CC Richard Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make 
>>> considerations for this. The hacker will now not only be free, but 
>>> make money. ;)
>>>
>>> Peace.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
>>
>> |
>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]|
>> |
>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
>> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
>> |give us equal mention.
>> |
>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
>> |
>> |--
>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>> |
>> And-
>>
>> |
>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>> |
>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
>> |
>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
>> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
>> |
>> |
>> |--
>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>> |
>>
>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
>> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed if 
>> it chokes its own success?
>>
>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains shall 
>> fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier and god, 
>> he slaves to.
>>
>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the decision?
>>
>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC 
>> C, and the original unix hacking?
>>
>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
>>
>
> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going 
> to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
>
> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with 
> similar sound of input and output.
>
> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
>
> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
>
> Peace.

No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to BSD. 
The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.

Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying video 
or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, desktop etc.) 
Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And minimal jitter 
programming.

So bye for now.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Unnud Oddox be with you

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
>>>>>>>> attitude.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have 
>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A test channel: 
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>
>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>>>
>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it 
>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", 
>>>> and "free software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, 
>>>> and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding 
>>>> uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based 
>>>> on on my conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that 
>>>> things need to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I 
>>>> also CC Richard Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make 
>>>> considerations for this. The hacker will now not only be free, but 
>>>> make money. ;)
>>>>
>>>> Peace.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
>>>
>>> |
>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. 
>>> ]]]|
>>> |
>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
>>> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
>>> |give us equal mention.
>>> |
>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
>>> |
>>> |--
>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>> |
>>> And-
>>>
>>> |
>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>>> |
>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
>>> |
>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
>>> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |--
>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>> |
>>>
>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
>>> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed if 
>>> it chokes its own success?
>>>
>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains 
>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier and 
>>> god, he slaves to.
>>>
>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the 
>>> decision?
>>>
>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC 
>>> C, and the original unix hacking?
>>>
>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
>>>
>>
>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going 
>> to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
>>
>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with 
>> similar sound of input and output.
>>
>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
>>
>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
>>
>> Peace.
>
> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to 
> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
>
> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying video 
> or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, desktop 
> etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And minimal 
> jitter programming.
>
> So bye for now.
>
Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.

So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of OpenBSD 
seems to be more like me.
Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and if 
GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented that at 
all, and is an enemy of this.
So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. 
"Unnud Oddox be with you".

Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
>>>>>>>>> attitude.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have 
>>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
>>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
>>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
>>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A test channel: 
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it 
>>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", 
>>>>> and "free software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, 
>>>>> and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding 
>>>>> uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based 
>>>>> on on my conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that 
>>>>> things need to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I 
>>>>> also CC Richard Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make 
>>>>> considerations for this. The hacker will now not only be free, but 
>>>>> make money. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Peace.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
>>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
>>>>
>>>> |
>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. 
>>>> ]]]|
>>>> |
>>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
>>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
>>>> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
>>>> |give us equal mention.
>>>> |
>>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
>>>> |
>>>> |--
>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>> |
>>>> And-
>>>>
>>>> |
>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. 
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |
>>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
>>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
>>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
>>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
>>>> |
>>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
>>>> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
>>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> |--
>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>> |
>>>>
>>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
>>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
>>>> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed 
>>>> if it chokes its own success?
>>>>
>>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains 
>>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier 
>>>> and god, he slaves to.
>>>>
>>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
>>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the 
>>>> decision?
>>>>
>>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC 
>>>> C, and the original unix hacking?
>>>>
>>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going 
>>> to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
>>>
>>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
>>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
>>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
>>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
>>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with 
>>> similar sound of input and output.
>>>
>>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
>>>
>>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
>>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
>>>
>>> Peace.
>>
>> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to 
>> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
>>
>> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
>> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying 
>> video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, 
>> desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And 
>> minimal jitter programming.
>>
>> So bye for now.
>>
> Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.
>
> So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of OpenBSD 
> seems to be more like me.
> Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and 
> if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented 
> that at all, and is an enemy of this.
> So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. 
> "Unnud Oddox be with you".
>
>
>
It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of 
"GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality of 
Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is 
ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the 
three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, 
"Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.

I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be 
obtained from me, if wanted: 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q

And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an Ultranet, 
a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.


Peaceful Saluations.

Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip.

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Den 11/12/2017 11:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in 
>>>>>>>>>> operation. Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short 
>>>>>>>>>> buffers, lowest latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, 
>>>>>>>>>> max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
>>>>>>>>>> attitude.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have 
>>>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
>>>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
>>>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
>>>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A test channel: 
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>>>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it 
>>>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open 
>>>>>> source", and "free software" to "Available Source". It is 
>>>>>> repeated a lot, and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not 
>>>>>> speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). 
>>>>>> This is also based on on my conclusion on philosophy research 
>>>>>> over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And even 
>>>>>> metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this, 
>>>>>> maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will 
>>>>>> now not only be free, but make money. ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
>>>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
>>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please 
>>>>> consider    ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all 
>>>>> enemies,     ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
>>>>> example. ]]]|
>>>>> |
>>>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux. If you call
>>>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
>>>>> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
>>>>> |give us equal mention.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
>>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
>>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |--
>>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>>> |
>>>>> And-
>>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please 
>>>>> consider    ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all 
>>>>> enemies,     ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
>>>>> example. ]]]
>>>>> |
>>>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
>>>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
>>>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
>>>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
>>>>> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
>>>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |--
>>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>>> |
>>>>>
>>>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
>>>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue 
>>>>> of finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed 
>>>>> succeed if it chokes its own success?
>>>>>
>>>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains 
>>>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier 
>>>>> and god, he slaves to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
>>>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the 
>>>>> decision?
>>>>>
>>>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to 
>>>>> PC C, and the original unix hacking?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am 
>>>> going to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
>>>>
>>>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
>>>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
>>>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
>>>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
>>>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution 
>>>> with similar sound of input and output.
>>>>
>>>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
>>>>
>>>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
>>>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
>>>>
>>>> Peace.
>>>
>>> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to 
>>> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
>>>
>>> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
>>> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying 
>>> video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, 
>>> desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And 
>>> minimal jitter programming.
>>>
>>> So bye for now.
>>>
>> Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.
>>
>> So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of 
>> OpenBSD seems to be more like me.
>> Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and 
>> if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented 
>> that at all, and is an enemy of this.
>> So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. 
>> "Unnud Oddox be with you".
>>
>>
>>
> It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of 
> "GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality 
> of Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is 
> ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the 
> three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, 
> "Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.
>
> I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be 
> obtained from me, if wanted: 
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>
> And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an 
> Ultranet, a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.
>
>
> Peaceful Saluations.
>
>
>
Btw, Stallmans own "LIbre"-tweak seems to be going in the same 
direction. However as long as GNU really is based on an illegal rip of 
Unix, where he is the frontman, a complete correction is really going to 
a legal fork of Unix, like OpenBSD. Or it still really is just as dodgy 
as Microsofts MS-DOS rip.

My about page is now up on ultranet. http://www.ultranet.life/author-info/