Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Fixes for TPM interrupt handling

["Michael Niewöhner" <linux@mniewoehner.de>]

Hi Lino,

On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 04:24 +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On 25.03.22 at 13:32, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Lino, I'd be happy to test the patches, when you have time and interest
> > > > to
> > > > work
> > > > on this again!
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, Michael
> > > 
> > > It's quite easy to test them out. Both fixes are in the mainline GIT tree.
> > > E.g. give a shot rc1, and please report if any issues persists to:
> > > 
> > >   linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org 
> > > 
> > > BR, Jarkko
> > 
> > I don't see Linos patches on mainline. Also, the series included four
> > patches:
> > [PATCH v3 0/4] Fixes for TPM interrupt handling
> > [PATCH v3 1/4] tpm: Use a threaded interrupt handler
> > [PATCH v3 2/4] tpm: Simplify locality handling
> > [PATCH v3 3/4] tpm: Fix test for interrupts
> > [PATCH v3 4/4] tpm: Only enable supported irqs
> > 
> > Three of them are relevant for the interrupt problem, which is still present
> > in
> > mainline, as these patches were refused:
> > [PATCH v3 1/4] tpm: Use a threaded interrupt handler
> > [PATCH v3 2/4] tpm: Simplify locality handling
> > [PATCH v3 3/4] tpm: Fix test for interrupts
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> 
> You are right, the interrupts are still not working in the mainline kernel.
> I would gladly make another attempt to fix this but rather step by step
> than in a series that tries to fix (different) things at once.

IMHO a series is perfectly fine, as it's easier to show *why* single changes are
required (like already done in v3 0/4). One just has to actually *read* what's
written there. Ahem. It's up to you, though.

> 
> A first step could be to have a sleepable context for the interrupt handling,
> since in case of SPI the accesses to the irq status register may sleep.
> 
> I sent a patch for this purpose once, but it seems to have gone lost:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210620023444.14684-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/
> 

Jarkko, looks like you've already tested that patch on your NUC?

> 
> Best regards,
> Lino
> 


Michael