From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, keescook@chromium.org,
jsnitsel@redhat.com, ml.linux@elloe.vision,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] tpm: Use a threaded interrupt handler
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 04:46:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJNKh2HGbURNBter@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364a268-7173-7253-543e-792ff2104e98@gmx.de>
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:54:37AM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 03.05.21 at 17:14, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 03:57:24PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> >> The interrupt handler uses tpm_tis_read32() and tpm_tis_write32() to access
> >> the interrupt status register. In case of SPI those accesses are done with
> >> the spi_bus_lock mutex held. This means that the status register cannot
> >> be read or written in interrupt context.
> >>
> >> For this reason request a threaded interrupt handler so that the required
> >> accesses can be done in process context.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
> >
> > No fixes tag.
> >
> > The short summary scopes now the whole TPM subsystem ("tpm:"), but the fix
> > is targetted *only* for tpm_tis_spi. How about "tpm, tpm_tis_spi: Allow to
> > sleep in the interrupt handler"?
> >
> > This also changes the semantics tpm_tis_*, not just tpm_tis_spi, which is
> > not acceptable. We cannot backport a fix like this.
> >
> > Probably you should just add a parameter to tpm_tis_core_init() to hint
> > that threaded IRQ is required, and then only conditionally do so.
> >
>
> Sure, this is doable although to be honest I dont see the issue with also the
> non-SPI code running in the threaded interrupt handler. The functionality should
> not change (especially since interrupts are not even working right now) and it would
> save us a special treatment of the SPI case.
It's violation of "3) Separate your changes" [*].
E.g. we do not want to introduce "improvements" or "simplifications" to
stable kernels on purpose.
[*] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.11/process/submitting-patches.html>
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-01 13:57 [PATCH v3 0/4] Fixes for TPM interrupt handling Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] tpm: Use a threaded interrupt handler Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-03 15:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-04 22:54 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-06 1:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-05-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] tpm: Simplify locality handling Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-03 15:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-04 23:15 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-06 1:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-24 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Fixes for TPM interrupt handling Michael Niewöhner
2022-03-25 2:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-25 12:32 ` Michael Niewöhner
2022-03-26 3:24 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-03-26 8:59 ` Michael Niewöhner
2022-03-30 15:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-20 5:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-20 5:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-04-24 2:22 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-04-25 13:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-30 15:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] tpm: Fix test for interrupts Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-03 15:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-04 23:18 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] tpm: Only enable supported irqs Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-01 19:09 ` Stefan Berger
2021-05-02 3:15 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-05-03 15:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJNKh2HGbURNBter@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ml.linux@elloe.vision \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).