linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified
@ 2016-02-22 13:45 Vinayak Menon
  2016-03-03 22:52 ` Rob Herring
  2017-01-10 16:16 ` Leonard Crestez
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vinayak Menon @ 2016-02-22 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: robh+dt, frowand.list, grant.likely, m.szyprowski, vinayakm.list,
	Vinayak Menon

early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch passes end as 0 to
__memblock_alloc_base, when limits are not specified. But
__memblock_alloc_base takes end value of 0 as MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
and limits the end to memblock.current_limit. This results in regions
never being placed in HIGHMEM area, for e.g. CMA.
Let __memblock_alloc_base allocate from anywhere in memory if limits are
not specified.

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
index 1a3556a..ed01c01 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
@@ -32,11 +32,13 @@ int __init __weak early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size,
 	phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, bool nomap,
 	phys_addr_t *res_base)
 {
+	phys_addr_t base;
 	/*
 	 * We use __memblock_alloc_base() because memblock_alloc_base()
 	 * panic()s on allocation failure.
 	 */
-	phys_addr_t base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
+	end = !end ? MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE : end;
+	base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
 	if (!base)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified
  2016-02-22 13:45 [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified Vinayak Menon
@ 2016-03-03 22:52 ` Rob Herring
  2017-01-10 16:16 ` Leonard Crestez
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2016-03-03 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinayak Menon
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, frowand.list,
	grant.likely, m.szyprowski, vinayakm.list

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:15:44PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch passes end as 0 to
> __memblock_alloc_base, when limits are not specified. But
> __memblock_alloc_base takes end value of 0 as MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> and limits the end to memblock.current_limit. This results in regions
> never being placed in HIGHMEM area, for e.g. CMA.
> Let __memblock_alloc_base allocate from anywhere in memory if limits are
> not specified.
> 
> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>

Applied and marked for stable.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified
  2016-02-22 13:45 [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified Vinayak Menon
  2016-03-03 22:52 ` Rob Herring
@ 2017-01-10 16:16 ` Leonard Crestez
  2017-01-10 19:49   ` Laura Abbott
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leonard Crestez @ 2017-01-10 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinayak Menon
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, robh+dt,
	frowand.list, grant.likely, m.szyprowski, vinayakm.list,
	Octavian Purdila

Hello,

I have some trouble with this patch.

It seems the intention is to allow CMA to be placed in highmem. If the 
CMA area is larger than highmem and no alloc-ranges is specified (just a 
size) it is possible to end up allocating a area that spans from 
multiple zones. This later breaks checks in cma_activate_area and makes 
most dma allocations fail.

Am I missing something or this a bug?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> 
wrote:
>
> early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch passes end as 0 to
> __memblock_alloc_base, when limits are not specified. But
> __memblock_alloc_base takes end value of 0 as MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> and limits the end to memblock.current_limit. This results in regions
> never being placed in HIGHMEM area, for e.g. CMA.
> Let __memblock_alloc_base allocate from anywhere in memory if limits are
> not specified.
>
> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index 1a3556a..ed01c01 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -32,11 +32,13 @@ int __init __weak early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size,
>         phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, bool nomap,
>         phys_addr_t *res_base)
>  {
> +       phys_addr_t base;
>         /*
>          * We use __memblock_alloc_base() because memblock_alloc_base()
>          * panic()s on allocation failure.
>          */
> -       phys_addr_t base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
> +       end = !end ? MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE : end;
> +       base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
>         if (!base)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
> member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified
  2017-01-10 16:16 ` Leonard Crestez
@ 2017-01-10 19:49   ` Laura Abbott
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laura Abbott @ 2017-01-10 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leonard Crestez, Vinayak Menon
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, robh+dt,
	frowand.list, m.szyprowski, vinayakm.list, Octavian Purdila

On 01/10/2017 08:16 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have some trouble with this patch.
> 
> It seems the intention is to allow CMA to be placed in highmem. If the CMA area is
> larger than highmem and no alloc-ranges is specified (just a size) it is possible
> to end up allocating a area that spans from multiple zones. This later breaks
> checks in cma_activate_area and makes most dma allocations fail.
> 
> Am I missing something or this a bug?
> 

This has been discussed in previous threads

https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147990760506179&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147928325113103&w=2

I haven't seen any follow up since then though.

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch passes end as 0 to
>> __memblock_alloc_base, when limits are not specified. But
>> __memblock_alloc_base takes end value of 0 as MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
>> and limits the end to memblock.current_limit. This results in regions
>> never being placed in HIGHMEM area, for e.g. CMA.
>> Let __memblock_alloc_base allocate from anywhere in memory if limits are
>> not specified.
>>
>> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> index 1a3556a..ed01c01 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> @@ -32,11 +32,13 @@ int __init __weak early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size,
>>         phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, bool nomap,
>>         phys_addr_t *res_base)
>>  {
>> +       phys_addr_t base;
>>         /*
>>          * We use __memblock_alloc_base() because memblock_alloc_base()
>>          * panic()s on allocation failure.
>>          */
>> -       phys_addr_t base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
>> +       end = !end ? MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE : end;
>> +       base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
>>         if (!base)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> -- 
>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
>> member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-10 19:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-22 13:45 [PATCH] of: alloc anywhere from memblock if range not specified Vinayak Menon
2016-03-03 22:52 ` Rob Herring
2017-01-10 16:16 ` Leonard Crestez
2017-01-10 19:49   ` Laura Abbott

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).