linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okaya@codeaurora.org
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"open list:EFIFB FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER"
	<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] efi/fb: Convert PCI bus address to resource if translated by the bridge
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:52:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7777f7bfead902f2f5175d48907fccec@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu96HQf0oJ1RC+wVU34FqqcCWrnDGag48vjNP_z86HhLBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2018-06-25 04:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 22 June 2018 at 21:29, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>> On 22 June 2018 at 20:30, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> On 6/22/2018 2:01 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>> Yes, it is part of the PCI I/O protocol definition. FrameBufferBase 
>>>>> is
>>>>> described as
>>>>> 
>>>>> """
>>>>> Base address of graphics linear frame buffer. Info contains
>>>>> information required to allow software to draw directly to the
>>>>> frame buffer without using Blt().Offset zero in
>>>>> FrameBufferBase represents the upper left pixel of the
>>>>> display.
>>>>> """
>>>> I just tried AMD Radeon and NVidia graphics cards on a system with
>>>> non-1:1 mapped MMIO windows, and in both cases, the GOP protocol
>>>> structure is populated correctly, i.e., using the CPU address not 
>>>> the
>>>> PCIe address.
>>>> 
>>>> EDK2 only recently gained support for MMIO translation in the host
>>>> bridge driver, so I so wonder if this is a platform issue rather 
>>>> than
>>>> a driver issue. It may be worth a try to dump the results of
>>>> GetBarAttributes() of all PCI I/O protocol instances (either in UEFI
>>>> or in the stub), to double check that the correct values are 
>>>> returned.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for checking out other platforms. I'll mark the issue as a 
>>> BIOS
>>> issue and bounce your feedback to the BIOS provider.
>>> 
>> 
>> I screwed up my testing, unfortunately. Both the public AMD GOP driver
>> I tried, and the Nvidia GT218 under x86 emulation break when using
>> MMIO translation. However, GraphicsOutputDxe in the EDK2 tree gets it
>> right, and uses PciIo->GetBarAttributes() to get the address of the
>> framebuffer region, which will return the CPU address not the PCI
>> address.
>> 
>>> Let's hold onto this patch for the moment.
>>> 
>> 
>> Yes. I'd like to get this resolved as well, but if the drivers are
>> dereferencing BAR values as CPU addresses, this is unlikely to be the
>> only thing that is broken under outbound translation.
> 
> Note that this was fixed fairly recently in EDK2, so BIOS vendors
> providing UEFI firmware for ARM platforms with outbound MMIO
> translation should probably incorporate this EDK2 patch
> 
> commit dc080d3b61e570e7a3163fc24afa6f8388d0c0bf
> Author: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
> Date:   Thu Feb 8 11:13:27 2018 +0800
> 
>     MdeModulePkg/PciBus: return CPU address for GetBarAttributes
> 
>     According to UEFI spec 2.7, PciIo->GetBarAttributes should return 
> host
>     address (CPU view ddress) rather than device address (PCI view
>     address), and
>     device address = host address + address translation offset,
>     so we subtract translation from device address before returning.
> 
> Note that this is not the only MMIO translation related change made by
> Heyi Guo to the generic PCI host bridge and bus drivers, but given
> that those did not support MMIO translation at all, I take it your
> affected platforms will already have their own changes to accommodate
> this.

Platform has been doing mmio translation for quite a while. Because all 
accesses go through pci io protocol, the rest of the UEFI never needed 
to be aware of bar address or do direct access.

This is the first time I hear of direct access. Maybe, GOP is a special 
case.

I started copying your response to the bios vendor.

They are probably missing that patch. I will pass it along.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-25 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18 14:17 [PATCH V2 1/2] efi/fb: Simplify fixup code to prefer struct resource Sinan Kaya
2018-05-18 14:17 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] efi/fb: Convert PCI bus address to resource if translated by the bridge Sinan Kaya
2018-06-13 14:22   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-13 15:06     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-13 15:17       ` okaya
2018-06-13 15:22         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-13 15:29           ` okaya
2018-06-13 15:45   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-13 15:50     ` okaya
2018-06-13 16:08     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-06-22  7:54       ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]         ` <CGME20180622100749eucas1p2a47cfba3b4d3d5004e9a0068917d5616@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-06-22 10:07           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
     [not found]             ` <CGME20180622101111eucas1p119946679a7686911744b1296c2796b15@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-06-22 10:11               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-06-19 22:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-22 11:21     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-22 13:52       ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-22 13:55         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-22 18:01           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-22 18:30             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-22 19:29               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-25  8:20                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-25 15:52                   ` okaya [this message]
2018-06-25 17:28                     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-25 17:29                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-25 17:31                         ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-13 15:42 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] efi/fb: Simplify fixup code to prefer struct resource Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-22 10:11   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7777f7bfead902f2f5175d48907fccec@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).