From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
andersson@kernel.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, quic_rgottimu@quicinc.com,
quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller bindings
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:53:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bf729a4-f3ac-4751-9275-a2aa4d62c036@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117173458.2312669-2-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
On 1/17/24 18:34, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Add devicetree binding for CPUSS Control Processor (CPUCP) mailbox
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> ---
[...]
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> + mailbox@17430000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-cpucp-mbox", "qcom,cpucp-mbox";
> + reg = <0x17430000 0x10000>, <0x18830000 0x300>;
These reg spaces are quite far apart.. On 7280-8550, a similar
mailbox exists, although it's dubbed RIMPS-mbox instead. In
that case, I separated the mbox into tx (via
qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c) and rx (with a simple driver). Still
haven't pushed or posted that anywhere, I'd need to access
another machine..
On (some of) these SoCs, one of the channels (rx[1], iirc?) clearly
bleeds into the CPUFREQ_HW/OSM register region, which gives an
impression of misrepresenting the hardware. X1E doesn't have a
node for cpufreq_hw defined, so I can't tell whether it's also the
case here.
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 17:34 [RFC 0/7] firmware: arm_scmi: Qualcomm Vendor Protocol Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 1/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller bindings Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 19:53 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2024-02-08 10:22 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-08 23:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 5:48 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-01-30 17:12 ` Rob Herring
2024-02-08 10:28 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-08 15:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-28 17:37 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 2/7] mailbox: Add support for QTI CPUCP mailbox controller Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 19:03 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 3/7] firmware: arm_scmi: Add QCOM vendor protocol Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 19:09 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-12 8:31 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 20:15 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-01-17 20:31 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-08 11:44 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-09 22:45 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 8:56 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 20:15 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-01-18 17:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-12 9:14 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-12 17:39 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-29 14:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-29 14:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 4/7] soc: qcom: Utilize qcom scmi vendor protocol for bus dvfs Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 20:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 10:33 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 20:41 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-12 10:24 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-12 13:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-20 15:07 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-28 17:31 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-29 14:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-20 16:19 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-29 14:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add cpucp mailbox and sram nodes Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Enable cpufreq Sibi Sankar
2024-01-18 15:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-02-12 9:28 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 17:34 ` [RFC 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Enable LLCC/DDR dvfs Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 20:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-12 10:05 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-01-17 20:47 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-12 9:47 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-02-12 18:11 ` [RFC 0/7] firmware: arm_scmi: Qualcomm Vendor Protocol Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bf729a4-f3ac-4751-9275-a2aa4d62c036@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rgottimu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).