From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:45:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d17c0c1-cdf0-f8cc-0cc4-4b9dda0b514d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305171204.GI11500@linux.intel.com>
On 05/03/20 18:12, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> In theory, everything up to the refactoring is non-controversial, i.e. we
>>> can bikeshed the refactoring without delaying the bug fixes.
>> Even the refactoring itself is much less controversial. I queued
>> everything, there's always time to unqueue.
> Looks like the build-time assertions don't play nice with older versions of
> gcc :-(
Yes, I was quite surprised that they worked. I suppose you could write
a macro that checks against 'G', 'e', 'n', 'u', 'i', 'n', 'e', 'I', 'n',
't', 'e', 'l'...
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-06 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 1:34 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Trace the original requested CPUID function in kvm_cpuid() Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 17:50 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Add helpers to perform CPUID-based guest vendor check Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 3:48 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-05 19:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:07 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM x86: Extend AMD specific guest behavior to Hygon virtual CPUs Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86: Fix CPUID range checks for Hypervisor and Centaur classes Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:43 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 19:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 21:10 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 21:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-10 17:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-10 17:23 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: x86: Add build-time assertions on validity of vendor strings Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: x86: Refactor out-of-range logic to contain the madness Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_cpuid() param that controls out-of-range logic Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-05 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06 8:45 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d17c0c1-cdf0-f8cc-0cc4-4b9dda0b514d@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).