linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Paul Burton <pburton@wavecomp.com>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uapi: avoid namespace conflict in linux/posix_types.h
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 20:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871s05fd8o.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wio1e4=WUUwmo-Ph55BEgH_X3oXzBpvPyLQg2TxzfGYuw@mail.gmail.com> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:27:57 -0700")

* Linus Torvalds:

> If we're changing kernel header files, it's easy enough to change the
> kernel users. I'd be more worried about user space that *uses* that
> thing, and currently accesses 'val[]' by name.
>
> So the patch looks a bit odd to me. How are people supposed to use
> fsid_t if they can't look at it?

The problem is that the header was previously not used pervasively in
userspace headers.  See commit a623a7a1a5670c25a16881f5078072d272d96b71
("y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion").  Very little code needed it
before.

On the glibc side, we nowadays deal with this by splitting headers
further.  (We used to suppress definitions with macros, but that tended
to become convoluted.)  In this case, moving the definition of
__kernel_long_t to its own header, so that
include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h can include that should fix it.

> So now that I _do_ see the patch, there's no way I'll apply it.

Fair enough.

Thanks,
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-07 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-19 16:51 [PATCH] uapi: avoid namespace conflict in linux/posix_types.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-19 21:46 ` David Miller
2019-03-19 21:55 ` Florian Weimer
2019-05-07 22:50 ` Joseph Myers
2019-06-07  4:28   ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-07 18:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-07 18:43       ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2019-06-07 18:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-17 11:45           ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-17 17:49             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-17 18:02               ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-17 18:13                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-17 18:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-17 18:19                   ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-17 18:48                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-18  7:44                       ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871s05fd8o.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pburton@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).