linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] genirq: Add mechanism to multiplex a single HW IPI
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:00:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735euzq60.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220720152348.2889109-4-apatel@ventanamicro.com>

On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:23:44 +0100,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> 
> All RISC-V platforms have a single HW IPI provided by the INTC local
> interrupt controller. The HW method to trigger INTC IPI can be through
> external irqchip (e.g. RISC-V AIA), through platform specific device
> (e.g. SiFive CLINT timer), or through firmware (e.g. SBI IPI call).
> 
> To support multiple IPIs on RISC-V, we add a generic IPI multiplexing
> mechanism which help us create multiple virtual IPIs using a single
> HW IPI. This generic IPI multiplexing is shared among various RISC-V
> irqchip drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/irq.h  |  16 ++++
>  kernel/irq/Kconfig   |   4 +
>  kernel/irq/Makefile  |   1 +
>  kernel/irq/ipi-mux.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 220 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 kernel/irq/ipi-mux.c
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 505308253d23..a97bf13a8965 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,22 @@ int __ipi_send_mask(struct irq_desc *desc, const struct cpumask *dest);
>  int ipi_send_single(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu);
>  int ipi_send_mask(unsigned int virq, const struct cpumask *dest);
>  
> +/**
> + * struct ipi_mux_ops - IPI multiplex operations
> + *
> + * @ipi_mux_clear:	Optional function to clear parent IPI
> + * @ipi_mux_send:	Trigger parent IPI on target CPUs
> + */
> +struct ipi_mux_ops {
> +	void (*ipi_mux_clear)(unsigned int parent_virq);
> +	void (*ipi_mux_send)(unsigned int parent_virq,
> +			     const struct cpumask *mask);
> +};
> +
> +void ipi_mux_process(void);
> +int ipi_mux_create(unsigned int parent_virq, unsigned int nr_ipi,
> +		   const struct ipi_mux_ops *ops);
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
>  /*
>   * Registers a generic IRQ handling function as the top-level IRQ handler in
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/Kconfig b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> index 10929eda9825..2388e7d40ed3 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ config GENERIC_IRQ_IPI
>  	bool
>  	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
>  
> +# Generic IRQ IPI Mux support
> +config GENERIC_IRQ_IPI_MUX
> +	bool
> +
>  # Generic MSI interrupt support
>  config GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
>  	bool
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/Makefile b/kernel/irq/Makefile
> index b4f53717d143..f19d3080bf11 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/irq/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION) += cpuhotplug.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += pm.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ) += msi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_IPI) += ipi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_IPI_MUX) += ipi-mux.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += affinity.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS) += debugfs.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR) += matrix.o
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/ipi-mux.c b/kernel/irq/ipi-mux.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bd6b31ca588b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/irq/ipi-mux.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Multiplex several virtual IPIs over a single HW IPI.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ipi-mux: " fmt
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +
> +static unsigned int ipi_mux_nr;
> +static unsigned int ipi_mux_parent_virq;
> +static struct irq_domain *ipi_mux_domain;
> +static const struct  ipi_mux_ops *ipi_mux_ops;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, ipi_mux_bits);
> +
> +static void ipi_mux_send_mask(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	/* Barrier before doing atomic bit update to IPI bits */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();
> +
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
> +		set_bit(d->hwirq, per_cpu_ptr(&ipi_mux_bits, cpu));
> +
> +	/* Barrier after doing atomic bit update to IPI bits */
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +
> +	/* Trigger the parent IPI */
> +	ipi_mux_ops->ipi_mux_send(ipi_mux_parent_virq, mask);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_chip ipi_mux_chip = {
> +	.name		= "IPI Mux",
> +	.ipi_send_mask	= ipi_mux_send_mask,

I've given this a bit more though, and I came to the conclusion that
we really should have the full masking semantics here, even if Linux
currently doesn't really use it.

It makes the handling a bit more complex, and unmasking a pending IPI
must be handled gracefully, but we already have implemented most of
that code in the irq-apple-aic driver.

And if we go down this road, such a driver should be very easy to move
over this infrastructure, making the change a lot more palatable.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20 15:23 [PATCH v7 0/7] RISC-V IPI Improvements Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] RISC-V: Clear SIP bit only when using SBI IPI operations Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] irqchip/riscv-intc: Allow drivers to directly discover INTC hwnode Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] genirq: Add mechanism to multiplex a single HW IPI Anup Patel
2022-07-21 11:00   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-07-21 11:44     ` Anup Patel
2022-07-21 12:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-21 12:26         ` Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] RISC-V: Treat IPIs as normal Linux IRQs Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] RISC-V: Allow marking IPIs as suitable for remote FENCEs Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] RISC-V: Use IPIs for remote TLB flush when possible Anup Patel
2022-07-20 15:23 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] RISC-V: Use IPIs for remote icache " Anup Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8735euzq60.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).