From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@freescale.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: ofpart: grab device tree node directly from master device node
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:32:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87611qjibi.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201510282347.27379.marex@denx.de> (Marek Vasut's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:47:27 +0100")
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> writes:
>> Isn't there the case of a single NAND controller with 2 identical chips,
>> each a 8 bit NAND chip, and the controller aggregating them to offer the
>> OS a single 16-bit NAND chip ?
>
> Is that using 1 or 2 physical chipselect lines on the CPU (controller) ?
I think it's 2 physical chipselects (CS0 and CS1). The way I understand it is
that the NAND controller asserts them both, issues the command on the command
line (shared between the 2 chips), and reads/writes on the separate data lines.
Cheers.
--
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-29 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 2:31 [PATCH 0/5] mtd: migrate 'of_node' handling to core, not in mtd_part_parser_data Brian Norris
2015-10-27 2:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] mtd: ofpart: grab device tree node directly from master device node Brian Norris
2015-10-27 7:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-27 17:54 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-28 1:01 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-28 8:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-28 7:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-28 16:11 ` Marek Vasut
2015-10-28 16:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-28 17:14 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-28 20:55 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-28 22:47 ` Marek Vasut
2015-10-29 6:32 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2015-10-29 7:24 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-29 17:23 ` Marek Vasut
2015-10-29 17:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-29 20:28 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-28 20:38 ` Marek Vasut
2015-10-27 2:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: nand: drop unnecessary partition parser data Brian Norris
2015-10-27 7:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-28 0:45 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27 2:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: spi-nor: " Brian Norris
2015-10-27 2:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] mtd: " Brian Norris
2015-10-27 2:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: drop 'of_node' " Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87611qjibi.fsf@belgarion.home \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=han.xu@freescale.com \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).