From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net: dsa: remove unnecessary phy.h include
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:11:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8ap18a0.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118001403.GJ27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> writes:
> Including phy.h and phy_fixed.h into net/dsa.h causes phy*.h to be an
> unnecessary dependency for quite a large amount of the kernel. There's
> very little which actually requires definitions from phy.h in net/dsa.h
> - the include itself only wants the declaration of a couple of
> structures and IFNAMSIZ.
>
> Add linux/if.h for IFNAMSIZ, declarations for the structures, phy.h to
> mv88e6xxx.h as it needs it for phy_interface_t, and remove both phy.h
> and phy_fixed.h from net/dsa.h.
>
> This patch reduces from around 800 files rebuilt to around 40 - even
> with ccache, the time difference is noticable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
This patch applies cleanly on net-next and builds correctly after
touching include/linux/phy.h. My boards work fine with it.
Tested-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Thanks,
Vivien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 0:14 [PATCH RFC] net: dsa: remove unnecessary phy.h include Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-18 1:11 ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
2017-01-18 1:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-01-18 21:37 ` David Miller
2017-01-18 21:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-18 21:48 ` David Miller
2017-01-18 21:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a8ap18a0.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).