linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:05:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inxjacnu.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465395546-28272-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> (Vitaly Kuznetsov's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:19:06 +0200")

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:

> I'm hitting 5 second timeout in rndis_filter_set_rss_param() while setting
> RSS parameters for the device. When this happens we end up returning
> -ETIMEDOUT from the function and rndis_filter_device_add() falls back to
> setting
>
> 	net_device->max_chn = 1;
>         net_device->num_chn = 1;
>         net_device->num_sc_offered = 0;
>
> but after a moment the rndis request succeeds and subchannels start to
> appear. netvsc_sc_open() does unconditional nvscdev->num_sc_offered-- and
> it becomes U32_MAX-1. Consequent rndis_filter_device_remove() will hang
> while waiting for all U32_MAX-1 subchannels to appear and this is not
> going to happen.
>
> The immediate issue could be solved by adding num_sc_offered > 0 check to
> netvsc_sc_open() but we're getting out of sync with the host and it's not
> easy to adjust things later, e.g. in this particular case we'll be creating
> queues without a user request for it and races are expected. Same applies
> to other parts of the driver which have the same completion timeout.
>
> Following the trend in drivers/hv/* code I suggest we remove all these
> timeouts completely. As a guest we can always trust the host we're running
> on and if the host screws things up there is no easy way to recover anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Kbuild test robot reports an unused variable after the patch, I'll fix
this and resend together with a related fix so please don't apply this
RFC to net-next atm.

[skip]

-- 
  Vitaly

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08 14:19 [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-06-08 14:31 ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-06-08 16:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87inxjacnu.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).