linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:31:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY1PR03MB2284D095D1651ED4EE9BCB85CA5E0@CY1PR03MB2284.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465395546-28272-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 10:19 AM
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; KY
> Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
> Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts
> 
> I'm hitting 5 second timeout in rndis_filter_set_rss_param() while setting
> RSS parameters for the device. When this happens we end up returning
> -ETIMEDOUT from the function and rndis_filter_device_add() falls back to
> setting
> 
> 	net_device->max_chn = 1;
>         net_device->num_chn = 1;
>         net_device->num_sc_offered = 0;
> 
> but after a moment the rndis request succeeds and subchannels start to
> appear. netvsc_sc_open() does unconditional nvscdev->num_sc_offered--
> and
> it becomes U32_MAX-1. Consequent rndis_filter_device_remove() will hang
> while waiting for all U32_MAX-1 subchannels to appear and this is not
> going to happen.
> 
> The immediate issue could be solved by adding num_sc_offered > 0 check to
> netvsc_sc_open() but we're getting out of sync with the host and it's not
> easy to adjust things later, e.g. in this particular case we'll be creating
> queues without a user request for it and races are expected. Same applies
> to other parts of the driver which have the same completion timeout.
> 
> Following the trend in drivers/hv/* code I suggest we remove all these
> timeouts completely. As a guest we can always trust the host we're running
> on and if the host screws things up there is no easy way to recover anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Thank you.
Acked-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08 14:19 [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-06-08 14:31 ` Haiyang Zhang [this message]
2016-06-08 16:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY1PR03MB2284D095D1651ED4EE9BCB85CA5E0@CY1PR03MB2284.namprd03.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).