* Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb [not found] <20210804194841.14544-1-paskripkin@gmail.com> @ 2021-08-04 19:57 ` Pavel Skripkin 2021-08-31 10:43 ` Pavel Skripkin 2021-08-13 15:01 ` [PATCH] " Pavel Skripkin 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-08-04 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, vasanth, senthilkumar Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, linux-kernel On 8/4/21 10:48 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The > problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. > > Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: > > ath9k_htc_probe_device() > /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ > ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed > ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed > > <IRQ> > ... > ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() > ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() > RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access > > In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move > htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the > ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make > all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. > > Also, I made whitespaces clean ups in *_STAT_* macros definitions > to make checkpatch.pl happy. > > Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> > --- > > Hi, ath9k maintainer/developers! > > I know, that you do not like changes, that wasn't tested on real > hardware. I really don't access to this one, so I'd like you to test it on > real hardware piece, if you have one. At least, this patch was tested by > syzbot [1] > > [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ead44e37afb6866ac0c7dd121b4ce07cb665f60 > > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 11 ++++++----- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h > index 0a1634238e67..c16b2a482e83 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h > @@ -326,11 +326,12 @@ static inline struct ath9k_htc_tx_ctl *HTC_SKB_CB(struct sk_buff *skb) > > #ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_HTC_DEBUGFS > > -#define TX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) > -#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) > -#define RX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) > -#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) > -#define CAB_STAT_INC priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++ > +#define __STAT_SAVE(expr) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv ? (expr) : 0) > +#define TX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) > +#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) > +#define RX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) > +#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) > +#define CAB_STAT_INC (priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++) > > #define TX_QSTAT_INC(q) (priv->debug.tx_stats.queue_stats[q]++) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c > index ff61ae34ecdf..07ac88fb1c57 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c > @@ -944,7 +944,6 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, > priv->hw = hw; > priv->htc = htc_handle; > priv->dev = dev; > - htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; > SET_IEEE80211_DEV(hw, priv->dev); > > ret = ath9k_htc_wait_for_target(priv); > @@ -965,6 +964,8 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, > if (ret) > goto err_init; > > + htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; > + > return 0; > > err_init: > Added missing LKML in CC. Sorry for confusion. With regards, Pavel Skripkin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb 2021-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-08-31 10:43 ` Pavel Skripkin 2021-09-19 17:28 ` Pavel Skripkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-08-31 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, vasanth, senthilkumar Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, linux-kernel On 8/4/21 10:57 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > On 8/4/21 10:48 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote: >> Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The >> problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. >> >> Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: >> >> ath9k_htc_probe_device() >> /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ >> ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed >> ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed >> >> <IRQ> >> ... >> ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() >> ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() >> RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access >> >> In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move >> htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the >> ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make >> all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. >> >> Also, I made whitespaces clean ups in *_STAT_* macros definitions >> to make checkpatch.pl happy. >> >> Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") >> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> Hi, ath9k maintainer/developers! >> >> I know, that you do not like changes, that wasn't tested on real >> hardware. I really don't access to this one, so I'd like you to test it on >> real hardware piece, if you have one. At least, this patch was tested by >> syzbot [1] >> >> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ead44e37afb6866ac0c7dd121b4ce07cb665f60 >> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 11 ++++++----- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c | 3 ++- >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h >> index 0a1634238e67..c16b2a482e83 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h >> @@ -326,11 +326,12 @@ static inline struct ath9k_htc_tx_ctl *HTC_SKB_CB(struct sk_buff *skb) >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_HTC_DEBUGFS >> >> -#define TX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) >> -#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) >> -#define RX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) >> -#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) >> -#define CAB_STAT_INC priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++ >> +#define __STAT_SAVE(expr) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv ? (expr) : 0) >> +#define TX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) >> +#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) >> +#define RX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) >> +#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) >> +#define CAB_STAT_INC (priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++) >> >> #define TX_QSTAT_INC(q) (priv->debug.tx_stats.queue_stats[q]++) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c >> index ff61ae34ecdf..07ac88fb1c57 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c >> @@ -944,7 +944,6 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, >> priv->hw = hw; >> priv->htc = htc_handle; >> priv->dev = dev; >> - htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; >> SET_IEEE80211_DEV(hw, priv->dev); >> >> ret = ath9k_htc_wait_for_target(priv); >> @@ -965,6 +964,8 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, >> if (ret) >> goto err_init; >> >> + htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; >> + >> return 0; >> >> err_init: >> > > Added missing LKML in CC. Sorry for confusion. > > Any chance to review this patch? Thanks With regards, Pavel Skripkin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb 2021-08-31 10:43 ` Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-09-19 17:28 ` Pavel Skripkin 2021-09-22 16:42 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Pavel Skripkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-09-19 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, vasanth, senthilkumar Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, linux-kernel On 8/31/21 13:43, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > On 8/4/21 10:57 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote: >> On 8/4/21 10:48 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote: >>> Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The >>> problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. >>> >>> Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: >>> >>> ath9k_htc_probe_device() >>> /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ >>> ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed >>> ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed >>> >>> <IRQ> >>> ... >>> ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() >>> ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() >>> RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access >>> >>> In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move >>> htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the >>> ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make >>> all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. >>> >>> Also, I made whitespaces clean ups in *_STAT_* macros definitions >>> to make checkpatch.pl happy. >>> >>> Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") >>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> >>> Hi, ath9k maintainer/developers! >>> >>> I know, that you do not like changes, that wasn't tested on real >>> hardware. I really don't access to this one, so I'd like you to test it on >>> real hardware piece, if you have one. At least, this patch was tested by >>> syzbot [1] >>> >>> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ead44e37afb6866ac0c7dd121b4ce07cb665f60 >>> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 11 ++++++----- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c | 3 ++- >>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h >>> index 0a1634238e67..c16b2a482e83 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h >>> @@ -326,11 +326,12 @@ static inline struct ath9k_htc_tx_ctl *HTC_SKB_CB(struct sk_buff *skb) >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_HTC_DEBUGFS >>> >>> -#define TX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) >>> -#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) >>> -#define RX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) >>> -#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) >>> -#define CAB_STAT_INC priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++ >>> +#define __STAT_SAVE(expr) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv ? (expr) : 0) >>> +#define TX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) >>> +#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) >>> +#define RX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) >>> +#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) >>> +#define CAB_STAT_INC (priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++) >>> >>> #define TX_QSTAT_INC(q) (priv->debug.tx_stats.queue_stats[q]++) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c >>> index ff61ae34ecdf..07ac88fb1c57 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c >>> @@ -944,7 +944,6 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, >>> priv->hw = hw; >>> priv->htc = htc_handle; >>> priv->dev = dev; >>> - htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; >>> SET_IEEE80211_DEV(hw, priv->dev); >>> >>> ret = ath9k_htc_wait_for_target(priv); >>> @@ -965,6 +964,8 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, >>> if (ret) >>> goto err_init; >>> >>> + htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; >>> + >>> return 0; >>> >>> err_init: >>> >> >> Added missing LKML in CC. Sorry for confusion. >> >> > Any chance to review this patch? Thanks > > gentle ping one more time :) Thanks With regards, Pavel Skripkin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RESEND] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb 2021-09-19 17:28 ` Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-09-22 16:42 ` Pavel Skripkin 2021-10-02 13:05 ` Pavel Skripkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-09-22 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, kuba, Sujith.Manoharan, linville, vasanth, senthilkumar Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel, Pavel Skripkin, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: ath9k_htc_probe_device() /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed <IRQ> ... ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> --- Why resend? No activity on this patch since 8/6/21, Kalle Valo has asked around, for review and no one claimed it. Resend changes: 1. Rebased on top of v5.15-rc2 2. Removed clean ups for macros 3. Added 1 more syzbot tag, since this patch has passed 2 syzbot tests --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 10 +++++----- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h index 0a1634238e67..c8cde2e05d77 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h @@ -325,11 +325,11 @@ static inline struct ath9k_htc_tx_ctl *HTC_SKB_CB(struct sk_buff *skb) } #ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_HTC_DEBUGFS - -#define TX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) -#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) -#define RX_STAT_INC(c) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) -#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) +#define __STAT_SAVE(expr) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv ? (expr) : 0) +#define TX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++) +#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a) +#define RX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++) +#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a) #define CAB_STAT_INC priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++ #define TX_QSTAT_INC(q) (priv->debug.tx_stats.queue_stats[q]++) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c index ff61ae34ecdf..07ac88fb1c57 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c @@ -944,7 +944,6 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, priv->hw = hw; priv->htc = htc_handle; priv->dev = dev; - htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; SET_IEEE80211_DEV(hw, priv->dev); ret = ath9k_htc_wait_for_target(priv); @@ -965,6 +964,8 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev, if (ret) goto err_init; + htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; + return 0; err_init: -- 2.33.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb 2021-09-22 16:42 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-10-02 13:05 ` Pavel Skripkin 2021-10-02 13:11 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-10-02 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, kuba, Sujith.Manoharan, linville, vasanth, senthilkumar Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe On 9/22/21 19:42, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The > problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. > > Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: > > ath9k_htc_probe_device() > /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ > ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed > ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed > > <IRQ> > ... > ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() > ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() > RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access > > In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move > htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the > ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make > all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. > > Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> > --- > > Why resend? > No activity on this patch since 8/6/21, Kalle Valo has asked around, > for review and no one claimed it. > > Resend changes: > 1. Rebased on top of v5.15-rc2 > 2. Removed clean ups for macros > 3. Added 1 more syzbot tag, since this patch has passed 2 syzbot > tests > Hi, ath9k maintainers! Does this patch need any further work? I can't see any comments on it since 8/6/21 and I can't see it on wireless patchwork. If this bug is already fixed and I've overlooked a fix commit, please, let me know. As I see syzbot hits this bug really often [1] Thanks [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ead44e37afb6866ac0c7dd121b4ce07cb665f60 With regards, Pavel Skripkin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb 2021-10-02 13:05 ` Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-10-02 13:11 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-02 13:14 ` Pavel Skripkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2021-10-02 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Skripkin Cc: ath9k-devel, davem, kuba, Sujith.Manoharan, linville, vasanth, senthilkumar, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> writes: > On 9/22/21 19:42, Pavel Skripkin wrote: >> Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The >> problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. >> >> Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: >> >> ath9k_htc_probe_device() >> /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ >> ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed >> ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed >> >> <IRQ> >> ... >> ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() >> ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() >> RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access >> >> In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move >> htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the >> ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make >> all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. >> >> Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") >> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> Why resend? >> No activity on this patch since 8/6/21, Kalle Valo has asked around, >> for review and no one claimed it. >> >> Resend changes: >> 1. Rebased on top of v5.15-rc2 >> 2. Removed clean ups for macros >> 3. Added 1 more syzbot tag, since this patch has passed 2 syzbot >> tests >> > > Hi, ath9k maintainers! > > Does this patch need any further work? I can't see any comments on it > since 8/6/21 and I can't see it on wireless patchwork. > > If this bug is already fixed and I've overlooked a fix commit, please, > let me know. As I see syzbot hits this bug really often [1] See my other mail I just sent about ath9k syzbot patches: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87tuhzhdyq.fsf@codeaurora.org/ In summary: please wait patiently once I'm able to test the syzbot patches on a real device. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb 2021-10-02 13:11 ` Kalle Valo @ 2021-10-02 13:14 ` Pavel Skripkin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-10-02 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kalle Valo Cc: ath9k-devel, davem, kuba, Sujith.Manoharan, linville, vasanth, senthilkumar, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe On 10/2/21 16:11, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Hi, ath9k maintainers! >> >> Does this patch need any further work? I can't see any comments on it >> since 8/6/21 and I can't see it on wireless patchwork. >> >> If this bug is already fixed and I've overlooked a fix commit, please, >> let me know. As I see syzbot hits this bug really often [1] > > See my other mail I just sent about ath9k syzbot patches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87tuhzhdyq.fsf@codeaurora.org/ > > In summary: please wait patiently once I'm able to test the syzbot > patches on a real device. > I see, thank you clarifying the situation. I understand, that maintaining ath9k devices alone is not easy task Thanks again With regards, Pavel Skripkin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb [not found] <20210804194841.14544-1-paskripkin@gmail.com> 2021-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-08-13 15:01 ` Pavel Skripkin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavel Skripkin @ 2021-08-13 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, vasanth, senthilkumar Cc: linux-wireless, netdev, syzbot+03110230a11411024147, linux-kernel On 8/4/21 10:48 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > Syzbot reported use-after-free Read in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb(). The > problem was in incorrect htc_handle->drv_priv initialization. > > Probable call trace which can trigger use-after-free: > > ath9k_htc_probe_device() > /* htc_handle->drv_priv = priv; */ > ath9k_htc_wait_for_target() <--- Failed > ieee80211_free_hw() <--- priv pointer is freed > > <IRQ> > ... > ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb() > ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() > RX_STAT_INC() <--- htc_handle->drv_priv access > > In order to not add fancy protection for drv_priv we can move > htc_handle->drv_priv initialization at the end of the > ath9k_htc_probe_device() and add helper macro to make > all *_STAT_* macros NULL save. > > Also, I made whitespaces clean ups in *_STAT_* macros definitions > to make checkpatch.pl happy. > > Fixes: fb9987d0f748 ("ath9k_htc: Support for AR9271 chipset.") > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+03110230a11411024147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> > --- > > Hi, ath9k maintainer/developers! > > I know, that you do not like changes, that wasn't tested on real > hardware. I really don't access to this one, so I'd like you to test it on > real hardware piece, if you have one. At least, this patch was tested by > syzbot [1] > > [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ead44e37afb6866ac0c7dd121b4ce07cb665f60 > > --- Btw, this patch also passes this syzbot test https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=b8101ffcec107c0567a0cd8acbbacec91e9ee8de With regards, Pavel Skripkin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-02 13:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210804194841.14544-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>
2021-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH] net: ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb Pavel Skripkin
2021-08-31 10:43 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-09-19 17:28 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-09-22 16:42 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Pavel Skripkin
2021-10-02 13:05 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-10-02 13:11 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-02 13:14 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-08-13 15:01 ` [PATCH] " Pavel Skripkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).