linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, "Lofstedt\,
	Marta" <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>, "Peres\,
	Martin" <martin.peres@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / QoS: Fix default runtime_pm device resume latency
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:37:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r2tje3ap.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX4WjXZQrP9QMGFV8sbntOUvfZ4y-uQSS4_4ArrCjsxWA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Tero,
>
> CC pinchartl, dri-devel

Cc: Marta, Martin

Our CI is hitting this too.

BR,
Jani.

>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> CC linux-renesas-soc
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, October 30, 2017 11:19:08 AM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>> > The recent change to the PM QoS framework to introduce a proper
>>>>> > no constraint value overlooked to handle the devices which don't
>>>>> > implement PM QoS OPS. Runtime PM is one of the more severely
>>>>> > impacted subsystems, failing every attempt to runtime suspend
>>>>> > a device. This leads into some nasty second level issues like
>>>>> > probe failures and increased power consumption among other things.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, that's bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry about breaking it and thanks for the fix!
>>>>>
>>>>> > Fix this by adding a proper return value for devices that don't
>>>>> > implement PM QoS implicitly.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Fixes: 0cc2b4e5a020 ("PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS")
>>>>> > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>>>>> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Applied.
>>>>
>>>> And pushed to Linus.
>>>
>>> I'm afraid it is not sufficient.
>>>
>>> Commit 0cc2b4e5a020fc7f ("PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS")
>>> introduced two issues on Renesas platforms:
>>>  1. After boot up, many devices have changed their state from "suspended"
>>>     to "active", according to /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
>>>     (comparing that file across boots is one of my standard tests).
>>>     Interestingly, doing a system suspend/resume cycle restores their state
>>>     to "suspended".
>>>
>>>  2. During system suspend, the following warning is printed on
>>>     r8a7791/koelsch:
>>>
>>>         i2c-rcar e6530000.i2c: runtime PM trying to suspend device but
>>> active child
>
>  3. I've just bisected a seemingly unrelated issue to the same commit.
>     On Salvator-XS with R-Car H3, initialization of the rcar-du driver now
>     takes more than 1 minute due to flip_done time outs, while it took 0.12s
>     before:
>
>     [    3.015035] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).
>     [    3.021721] [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query.
>     [   13.280738] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done] *ERROR*
> [CRTC:58:crtc-3] flip_done timed out
>     [   23.520707] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done] *ERROR*
> [CRTC:58:crtc-3] flip_done timed out
>     [   33.760708] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done] *ERROR*
> [CRTC:58:crtc-3] flip_done timed out
>     [   44.000755] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done] *ERROR*
> [CRTC:58:crtc-3] flip_done timed out
>     [   44.003597] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48
>     [   54.240707] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done] *ERROR*
> [CRTC:58:crtc-3] flip_done timed out
>     [   64.480706] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done] *ERROR*
> [CRTC:58:crtc-3] flip_done timed out
>     [   64.544876] rcar-du feb00000.display: fb0:  frame buffer device
>     [   64.552013] [drm] Initialized rcar-du 1.0.0 20130110 for
> feb00000.display on minor 0
>     [   64.559873] [drm] Device feb00000.display probed
>
>>> Commit 2a9a86d5c81389cd ("PM / QoS: Fix default runtime_pm device resume
>>> latency") fixes the second issue, but not the first.
>
> ... nor the third.
>
>>> Reverting commits 2a9a86d5c81389cd ("PM / QoS: Fix default runtime_pm
>>> device resume latency") and 0cc2b4e5a020fc7f ("PM / QoS: Fix device resume
>>> latency PM QoS") fixes both.
>
> ... all three.
>
>>> Do you have a clue?
>>> Thanks!


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-30  7:10 [PATCH] PM / QoS: Fix default runtime_pm device resume latency Tero Kristo
2017-10-30 10:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-30 23:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-31  7:13     ` Tero Kristo
2017-10-31  8:40       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-31 10:18         ` Tero Kristo
2017-10-31 13:09     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-31 13:10       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-31 13:55         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-31 14:04           ` Ulf Hansson
2017-10-31 16:35             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-31 15:37           ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-10-31 16:40             ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-31 17:12           ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-10-31 17:22           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-31 18:07             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-31 22:32               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-01 10:28                 ` Tero Kristo
2017-11-01 20:50                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-01 22:36                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r2tje3ap.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marta.lofstedt@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.peres@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).