linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	bhe@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only allow to set crash_kexec_post_notifiers on boot time
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:45:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9g6fuub.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921201811.GB3437@char.us.oracle.com> (Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:18:12 -0400")

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> writes:

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:47:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:25:46 +0800 Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > crash_kexec_post_notifiers enables running various panic notifier
>> > before kdump kernel booting. This increases risks of kdump failure.
>> > It is well documented in kernel-parameters.txt. We do not suggest
>> > people to enable it together with kdump unless he/she is really sure.
>> > This is also not suggested to be enabled by default when users are
>> > not aware in distributions.
>> > 
>> > But unfortunately it is enabled by default in systemd, see below
>> > discussions in a systemd report, we can not convince systemd to change
>> > it:
>> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16661
>> > 
>> > Actually we have got reports about kdump kernel hangs in both s390x
>> > and powerpcle cases caused by the systemd change,  also some x86 cases
>> > could also be caused by the same (although that is in Hyper-V code
>> > instead of systemd, that need to be addressed separately).
>
> Perhaps it may be better to fix the issus on s390x and PowerPC as well?
>
>> > 
>> > Thus to avoid the auto enablement here just disable the param writable
>> > permission in sysfs.
>> > 
>> 
>> Well.  I don't think this is at all a desirable way of resolving a
>> disagreement with the systemd developers
>> 
>> At the above github address I'm seeing "ryncsn added a commit to
>> ryncsn/systemd that referenced this issue 9 days ago", "pstore: don't
>> enable crash_kexec_post_notifiers by default".  So didn't that address
>> the issue?
>
> It does in systemd, but there is a strong interest in making this on
> by default.

There is also a strong interest in removing this code entirely from the
kernel.

This failure is a case in point.

I think I am at my I told you so point.  This is what all of the testing
over all the years has said.  Leaving functionality to the peculiarities
of firmware when you don't have to, and can actually control what is
going on doesn't work.

Eric



  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18  3:25 [PATCH] Only allow to set crash_kexec_post_notifiers on boot time Dave Young
2020-09-19  0:47 ` Andrew Morton
2020-09-19  7:26   ` Dave Young
2020-09-21 20:18   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2020-09-22  1:45     ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2020-09-23  2:43       ` Dave Young
2020-09-23 15:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2020-09-24 16:15           ` Michael Kelley
2020-09-24 16:25             ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-09-24 16:43               ` Michael Kelley
2020-09-24 17:16                 ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-25  3:05                   ` Dave Young
2020-09-25 14:56                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2020-09-27  2:51                       ` Dave Young
2020-09-29 13:36                       ` Philipp Rudo
2020-09-29 19:10                         ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 10:58     ` Philipp Rudo
2020-09-22 14:50       ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 17:04         ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2020-09-23  2:25     ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v9g6fuub.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).