Re: [PATCH] security/integrity: Include __func__ in messages for easier debug

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 11:23 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 2/3/2020 11:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 11:55 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On 2/3/20 6:21 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 19:08 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 19:01 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > > > > Change messages to messages to make it easier to debug. The following
> > > > > > error message isn't informative enough to figure out what failed.
> > > > > > Change messages to include function information.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >   .../integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c     | 14 ++++++++------
> > > > > >   security/integrity/platform_certs/load_uefi.c   | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > > > > >   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c
> > > > > perhaps instead add #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > > > > so all the pr_<level> logging is more specific.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This would prefix all pr_<level> output with "integrity: "
> > > Joe! Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
> > > 
> > > > Agreed.  Joe, could you post a patch with a proper patch description
> > > > for this?
> > > > 
> > > I have been looking into this a bit more and there is an opportunity
> > > here to add #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt to integrity.h
> > > and get rid of duplicate defines.
> > That might work but:
> > 
> > $ git grep --name-only 'integrity\.h' security | xargs grep pr_fmt
> > security/integrity/digsig.c:#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c:#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > security/security.c:#define pr_fmt(fmt) "LSM: " fmt
> > 
> > Here security.c already uses "LSM: "
> > 
> > Does anyone care about the LSM: prefix?
> 
> Yes. 

No worries.  My mistake it wouldn't change.

It was a bad grep as the integrity.h in security.c is #included
from the linux/include path and not the integrity subdirectory.