linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree
@ 2020-12-10  4:58 Stephen Rothwell
  2020-12-10 14:03 ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-12-10  4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
	Michal Simek
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2021 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:

  arch/microblaze/Kconfig
  arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile

between commit:

  05cdf457477d ("microblaze: Remove noMMU code")

from the microblaze tree and commit:

  7ac1b26b0a72 ("microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")

from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/microblaze/Kconfig
index 6acbb4571b0f,7f6ca0ab4f81..000000000000
--- a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
@@@ -139,8 -143,19 +139,9 @@@ config ADVANCED_OPTION
  comment "Default settings for advanced configuration options are used"
  	depends on !ADVANCED_OPTIONS
  
 -config XILINX_UNCACHED_SHADOW
 -	bool "Are you using uncached shadow for RAM ?"
 -	depends on ADVANCED_OPTIONS && !MMU
 -	default n
 -	help
 -	  This is needed to be able to allocate uncachable memory regions.
 -	  The feature requires the design to define the RAM memory controller
 -	  window to be twice as large as the actual physical memory.
 -
  config HIGHMEM
  	bool "High memory support"
 -	depends on MMU
+ 	select KMAP_LOCAL
  	help
  	  The address space of Microblaze processors is only 4 Gigabytes large
  	  and it has to accommodate user address space, kernel address
diff --cc arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
index cd8a844bf29e,8ced71100047..000000000000
--- a/arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
@@@ -5,5 -5,4 +5,4 @@@
  
  obj-y := consistent.o init.o
  
 -obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += pgtable.o mmu_context.o fault.o
 +obj-y += pgtable.o mmu_context.o fault.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) += highmem.o

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree
  2020-12-10  4:58 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2020-12-10 14:03 ` Michal Simek
  2020-12-16  1:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2020-12-10 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

Hi Stephen,

On 10. 12. 20 5:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   arch/microblaze/Kconfig
>   arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   05cdf457477d ("microblaze: Remove noMMU code")
> 
> from the microblaze tree and commit:
> 
>   7ac1b26b0a72 ("microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Thanks for letting me know. I will mentioned it to Linus.
Your resolution is correct.

Thanks,
Michal


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree
  2020-12-10 14:03 ` Michal Simek
@ 2020-12-16  1:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2020-12-16 10:04     ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-12-16  1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Simek
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:03:23 +0100 Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote:
>
> On 10. 12. 20 5:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
> > 
> >   arch/microblaze/Kconfig
> >   arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   05cdf457477d ("microblaze: Remove noMMU code")
> > 
> > from the microblaze tree and commit:
> > 
> >   7ac1b26b0a72 ("microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")
> > 
> > from the tip tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >   
> 
> Thanks for letting me know. I will mentioned it to Linus.
> Your resolution is correct.

These are now conflicts between the microblaze tree and Linus' tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree
  2020-12-16  1:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2020-12-16 10:04     ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2020-12-16 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

Hi Stephen,

On 16. 12. 20 2:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:03:23 +0100 Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote:
>>
>> On 10. 12. 20 5:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
>>>
>>>   arch/microblaze/Kconfig
>>>   arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>>   05cdf457477d ("microblaze: Remove noMMU code")
>>>
>>> from the microblaze tree and commit:
>>>
>>>   7ac1b26b0a72 ("microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")
>>>
>>> from the tip tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>>> complex conflicts.
>>>   
>>
>> Thanks for letting me know. I will mentioned it to Linus.
>> Your resolution is correct.
> 
> These are now conflicts between the microblaze tree and Linus' tree.
> 

Yes. I am just preparing pull request to Linus with mentioning
resolution as you sent last time.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-16 10:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-10  4:58 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-10 14:03 ` Michal Simek
2020-12-16  1:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-16 10:04     ` Michal Simek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).