linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	omer.akram@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [v4.8-rc1 Regression] sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:49:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b29f878-29bc-8efa-6d34-d5df3b68e020@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161018115651.GA20956@linaro.org>

On 10/18/2016 07:56 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Le Tuesday 18 Oct 2016 à 12:34:12 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On 18 October 2016 at 11:07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>> So aside from funny BIOSes, this should also show up when creating
>>>> cgroups when you have offlined a few CPUs, which is far more common I'd
>>>> think.
>>> The problem is also that the load of the tg->se[cpu] that represents
>>> the tg->cfs_rq[cpu] is initialized to 1024 in:
>>> alloc_fair_sched_group
>>>      for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>>>          init_entity_runnable_average(se);
>>>             sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
>>>
>>> Initializing  sa->load_avg to 1024 for a newly created task makes
>>> sense as we don't know yet what will be its real load but i'm not sure
>>> that we have to do the same for se that represents a task group. This
>>> load should be initialized to 0 and it will increase when task will be
>>> moved/attached into task group
>> Yes, I think that makes sense, not sure how horrible that is with the
> That should not be that bad because this initial value is only useful for
> the few dozens of ms that follow the creation of the task group 
>
>> current state of things, but after your propagate patch, that
>> reinstates the interactivity hack that should work for sure.
> The patch below fixes the issue on my platform: 
>
> Dietmar, Omer can you confirm that this fix the problem of your platform too ?
>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)Vinc
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 8b03fb5..89776ac 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,14 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
>  	 * will definitely be update (after enqueue).
>  	 */
>  	sa->period_contrib = 1023;
> -	sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
> +	/*
> +	 * Tasks are intialized with full load to be seen as heavy task until
> +	 * they get a chance to stabilize to their real load level.
> +	 * group entity are intialized with null load to reflect the fact that
> +	 * nothing has been attached yet to the task group.
> +	 */
> +	if (entity_is_task(se))
> +		sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
>  	sa->load_sum = sa->load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>  	/*
>  	 * At this point, util_avg won't be used in select_task_rq_fair anyway
>
>
>
>
Omer also reports that this patch fixes the bug for him as well.  Thanks
for the great work, Vincent!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-19 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-07 19:38 [v4.8-rc1 Regression] sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes Joseph Salisbury
2016-10-07 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-07 20:22   ` Joseph Salisbury
2016-10-07 20:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-08  8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-08  8:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-10-08 11:37     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-08 11:49       ` Mike Galbraith
2016-10-12 12:20         ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-12 15:35           ` Joseph Salisbury
2016-10-12 16:21           ` Joseph Salisbury
2016-10-13 10:58             ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-13 15:52               ` Joseph Salisbury
2016-10-13 16:48                 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-13 18:49                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-13 21:34                     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-14  8:24                       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-14 13:10                         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-14 15:18                           ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-14 16:04                             ` Joseph Salisbury
2016-10-17  9:09                               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-17 11:49                                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-17 13:19                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-17 13:54                                     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-17 22:52                                       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-18  8:43                                         ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18  9:07                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-18  9:45                                           ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 10:34                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-18 11:56                                               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 21:58                                                 ` Joonwoo Park
2016-10-19  6:42                                                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-19  9:46                                                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-19 11:25                                                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-19 15:33                                                     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-19 17:33                                                       ` Joonwoo Park
2016-10-19 17:50                                                       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-19 11:33                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-19 11:50                                                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-19 13:30                                                 ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-10-19 17:41                                                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-20  7:56                                                     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-10-19 14:49                                                 ` Joseph Salisbury [this message]
2016-10-19 14:53                                                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 11:15                                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-18 12:07                                             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b29f878-29bc-8efa-6d34-d5df3b68e020@canonical.com \
    --to=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=omer.akram@canonical.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).