From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: rric@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
james.morse@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting to avoid code duplication
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:26:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d89ffe0-6e34-a82d-09f0-9dd803fc256f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfEEN0ATgS+TakLV@zn.tnic>
Hi, Borislav,
在 2022/1/26 PM4:20, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
>> ghes_edac_report_mem_error() in ghes_edac.c is a Long Method and have
>> Duplicated Code with cper_mem_err_location(), cper_dimm_err_location(), and
>> cper_mem_err_type_str() in drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c. In addition, the
>> cper_print_mem() in drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c only reports the error
>> status and misses its description.
>
> Dude, what about
>
> wait for a week or until the patchset has been fully reviewed
>
> don't you understand?!
>
> Please let me know what about the review process is not clear to you so
> that we can document it better.
Emmm, when I received your replied email, I thought you had fully reviewed them. So
I work to address your comments and reply as soon as possible. Sorry, I misunderstood.
Of course, I can wait. As I said before, take your time.
By the way, I have a question about review process: after waiting for a period
of time, how can I tell whether you have no comments or are still in review process?
Best Regards,
Shuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-26 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 13:40 [PATCH v2 0/3] ghes_edac: refactor memory error reporting to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2021-12-10 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ghes_edac: unify memory error report format with cper Shuai Xue
2021-12-28 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-29 3:22 ` Shuai Xue
2021-12-30 17:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-31 3:04 ` Shuai Xue
2021-12-10 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ghes_edac: refactor memory error location processing Shuai Xue
2021-12-10 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ghes_edac: refactor error status fields decoding Shuai Xue
2021-12-16 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ghes_edac: refactor memory error reporting to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2022-01-16 7:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting to avoid Shuai Xue
2022-01-16 7:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] efi/cper: add cper_mem_err_status_str to decode error description Shuai Xue
2022-01-16 7:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] EDAC/ghes: use cper functions to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2022-01-24 2:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting to avoid Shuai Xue
2022-01-24 2:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] efi/cper: add cper_mem_err_status_str to decode error description Shuai Xue
2022-01-24 21:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-25 2:45 ` Shuai Xue
2022-01-25 10:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-25 11:49 ` Shuai Xue
2022-01-25 12:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-25 15:02 ` Shuai Xue
2022-01-24 2:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 2/2] EDAC/ghes: use cper functions to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2022-01-25 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting " Shuai Xue
2022-01-25 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] efi/cper: add cper_mem_err_status_str to decode error description Shuai Xue
2022-01-25 19:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-26 5:25 ` Shuai Xue
2022-01-25 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] EDAC/ghes: use cper functions to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2022-01-26 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting " Shuai Xue
2022-01-26 8:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-26 9:26 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2022-01-26 10:16 ` Boris Petkov
2022-01-27 2:28 ` Shuai Xue
2022-01-26 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] efi/cper: add cper_mem_err_status_str to decode error description Shuai Xue
2022-01-26 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] EDAC/ghes: use cper functions to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2022-01-29 13:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-12 11:28 ` Shuai Xue
2022-03-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting " Shuai Xue
2022-03-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] efi/cper: add cper_mem_err_status_str to decode error description Shuai Xue
2022-03-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] EDAC/ghes: use cper functions to avoid code duplication Shuai Xue
2022-03-04 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-07 6:16 ` Shuai Xue
2022-03-07 7:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-08 14:40 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] EDAC/ghes: refactor memory error reporting " Shuai Xue
2022-03-22 6:09 ` Shuai Xue
2022-04-01 6:20 ` Shuai Xue
2022-04-08 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-08 14:40 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] efi/cper: add cper_mem_err_status_str to decode error description Shuai Xue
2022-04-01 20:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-06 21:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-08 14:40 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] EDAC/ghes: Unify CPER memory error location reporting Shuai Xue
2022-03-08 14:40 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] efi/cper: reformat CPER memory error location to more readable Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d89ffe0-6e34-a82d-09f0-9dd803fc256f@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).