Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf vendor events: Add stepping in CPUID string for x86

["Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>]

On 11/15/2018 9:14 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:01:46PM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>>
>>
>> On 11/15/2018 3:44 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 01:24:15PM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Perf tools cannot find the proper event list for Cascadelake server.
>>>> Because Cascadelake server and Skylake server have the same CPU model
>>>> number, which are used by perf tools to find the event list.
>>>>
>>>> The stepping for Skylake server is up to 4.
>>>> The stepping for Cascadelake server starts from 5.
>>>> The stepping can be used to distinguish between them.
>>>>
>>>> The stepping is added in get_cpuid_str().
>>>> The stepping information for Skylake server is updated in mapfile.csv.
>>>> A x86 specific strcmp_cpuid_cmp() function is added to handle two CPUID
>>>> formats in mapfile.csv, "vendor-family-model-stepping" and
>>>> "vendor-family-model".
>>>> - If a cpuid-regular-expression from the mapfile.csv using the new
>>>>     stepping format, a cpuid-string generated on the machine must include
>>>>     stepping. Otherwise, it is a mismatch.
>>>> - If the cpuid-regular-expression using the old non-stepping format,
>>>>     the stepping in the cpuid-string will be ignored.
>>>>
>>>> The script, which using environment string "PERF_CPUID" without stepping
>>>> on Skylake server, will be broken. If so, users must fix their scripts.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Jirka,
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> Are you OK with the patch?
>> If yes, I will go ahead to cleanup the *_cpuid_str() by moving them to
>> header.c as promised. https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/15/929
>> The new patch will be on top of this patch.
> 
> I'm travelling, will look at it soon, can't now, battery almost deead
> :-\

Hi Arnaldo,

Have you got a chance to look at the code?

Thanks,
Kan