From: Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: sm3 - add a new alias name sm3-256
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:02:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9683f764-c8c7-e123-b5f6-4f155bd1b10b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR0401MB36523805F71721000F188F2FC3190@CY4PR0401MB3652.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 2/10/2020 12:01 PM, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
> Well, the current specification surely doesn't define anything else and is
> already over a decade old. So what would be the odds that they add a
> different blocksize variant_now_ AND still call that SM3-something?
I just got a note from a cryptographer who said there were discussions
last year about a future SM3 with 512 bit output.
Given that, why not plan ahead and use sm3-256? Is there any downside?
Is the cost any more than 4 bytes in some source code?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 9:22 [PATCH] IMA hash algorithm supports sm3-256 Tianjia Zhang
2020-02-07 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] crypto: sm3 - add a new alias name sm3-256 Tianjia Zhang
2020-02-10 3:17 ` Eric Biggers
[not found] ` <b7ce247b-ede1-4b01-bb11-894c042679e1.tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
2020-02-10 12:06 ` 回复：[PATCH " Tianjia Zhang
2020-02-10 16:30 ` [PATCH " Ken Goldman
2020-02-10 16:39 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <7a496bb15f264eab920bf081338d67af@MN2PR20MB2973.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
2020-02-10 17:01 ` Van Leeuwen, Pascal
2020-02-10 17:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-10 18:02 ` Ken Goldman [this message]
2020-02-10 18:36 ` Eric Biggers
[not found] ` <3b21122352a44cb9a20030a32f07e38a@MN2PR20MB2973.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
2020-02-11 7:56 ` Van Leeuwen, Pascal
2020-02-07 9:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] ima: add sm3-256 algorithm to hash algorithm configuration list Tianjia Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9683f764-c8c7-e123-b5f6-4f155bd1b10b@linux.ibm.com \
--to=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).