From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@hotmail.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:30:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98bf31c1-16f2-1058-14e3-cf3e67be06f6@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201902191709341581016@zte.com.cn>
>> Will corrections become relevant for specifications in (assignment) exclusions
>> of the second SmPL ellipsis in the discussed script?
>
> Let's do some experiments with the code in the current kernel.
It seems that you provided additional information for the adjustment
of when specifications according to the first SmPL ellipsis.
Other details are still in the waiting queue for the desired software clarification.
Regards,
Markus
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201902191709341581016@zte.com.cn>
2019-02-19 9:30 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
[not found] <201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn>
2019-02-19 7:04 ` [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() Julia Lawall
2019-02-19 8:12 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-19 8:29 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-06 11:18 ` Markus Elfring
[not found] <201902181122502228026@zte.com.cn>
2019-02-18 6:43 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-18 8:19 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-18 21:40 ` Markus Elfring
[not found] <HK0PR02MB36344E2B29CEB195892F6420B2610@HK0PR02MB3634.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>
2019-02-16 18:39 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH v6] " Markus Elfring
2019-02-17 11:37 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-17 11:42 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-17 11:48 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-17 12:00 ` [v6] " Markus Elfring
2019-02-17 12:05 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-17 12:20 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-17 12:52 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-17 13:14 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98bf31c1-16f2-1058-14e3-cf3e67be06f6@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=yellowriver2010@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).