linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 01/10] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

When a memory error, CPU error, PCIe error, or other type of hardware error
that's covered by RAS occurs, firmware should populate the shared GHES memory
location with the proper GHES structures to notify the OS of the error.
For example, platforms that implement firmware first handling may implement
separate GHES sources for corrected errors and uncorrected errors. If the
error is an uncorrectable error, then the firmware will notify the OS
immediately since the error needs to be handled ASAP. The OS will then be able
to take the appropriate action needed such as offlining a page. If the error
is a corrected error, then the firmware will not interrupt the OS immediately.
Instead, the OS will see and report the error the next time it's GHES timer
expires. The kernel will first parse the GHES structures and report the errors
through the kernel logs and then notify the user space through RAS trace
events. This allows user space applications such as RAS Daemon to see the
errors and report them however the user desires. This patchset extends the
kernel functionality for RAS errors based on updates in the UEFI 2.6 and
ACPI 6.1 specifications.

An example flow from firmware to user space could be:

                 +---------------+
       +-------->|               |
       |         |  GHES polling |--+
+-------------+  |    source     |  |   +---------------+   +------------+
|             |  +---------------+  |   |  Kernel GHES  |   |            |
|  Firmware   |                     +-->|  CPER AER and |-->|  RAS trace |
|             |  +---------------+  |   |  EDAC drivers |   |   event    |
+-------------+  |               |  |   +---------------+   +------------+
       |         |  GHES sci     |--+
       +-------->|   source      |
                 +---------------+

Add support for Generic Hardware Error Source (GHES) v2, which introduces the
capability for the OS to acknowledge the consumption of the error record
generated by the Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) controller.
This eliminates potential race conditions between the OS and the RAS controller.

Add support for the timestamp field added to the Generic Error Data Entry v3,
allowing the OS to log the time that the error is generated by the firmware,
rather than the time the error is consumed. This improves the correctness of
event sequences when analyzing error logs. The timestamp is added in
ACPI 6.1, reference Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry.

Add support for ARMv8 Common Platform Error Record (CPER) per UEFI 2.6
specification. ARMv8 specific processor error information is reported as part of
the CPER records.  This provides more detail on for processor error logs. This
can help describe ARMv8 cache, tlb, and bus errors.

Synchronous External Abort (SEA) represents a specific processor error condition
in ARM systems. A handler is added to recognize SEA errors, and a notifier is
added to parse and report the errors before the process is killed. Refer to
section N.2.1.1 in the Common Platform Error Record appendix of the UEFI 2.6
specification.

Currently the kernel ignores CPER records that are unrecognized.
On the other hand, UEFI spec allows for non-standard (eg. vendor
proprietary) error section type in CPER (Common Platform Error Record),
as defined in section N2.3 of UEFI version 2.5. Therefore, user
is not able to see hardware error data of non-standard section.

If section Type field of Generic Error Data Entry is unrecognized,
prints out the raw data in dmesg buffer, and also adds a tracepoint
for reporting such hardware errors.

Currently even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel
does not honor the severity level and panic. With the firmware first
model, the platform could inform the OS about a fatal hardware error
through the non-NMI GHES notification type. The OS should panic when a
hardware error record is received with this severity.

Add support to handle SEAs that occur while a KVM guest kernel is
running. Currently these are unsupported by the guest abort handling.

V7: Update a couple prints for ARM processor errors
    Add Print notifying if overflow occurred for ARM processor errors
    Check for ARM configuration to allow the compiler to ignore ARM code
     on non-ARM systems
    Use SEA acronym instead of spelling it out
    Update fault_info prints to be more clear
    Add NMI locking to SEA notification
    Remove error info structure from ARM trace event since there can be
     a variable amount of these structures

V6: Change HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2 to IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2 for readability
    Move APEI helper defines from cper.h to ghes.h
    Add data_len decrement back into print loop
    Change references to ARMv8 to just ARM
    Rewrite ARM processor context info parsing
    Check valid bit of ARM error info field before printing it
    Add include of linux/uuid.h in ghes.c

V5: Fix GHES goto logic for error conditions
    Change ghes_do_read_ack to ghes_ack_error
    Make sure data version check is >= 3
    Use CPER helper functions in print functions
    Make handle_guest_sea() dummy function static for arm
    Add arm to subject line for KVM patch

V4: Add bit offset left shift to read_ack_write value
    Make HEST generic and generic_v2 structures a union in the ghes structure
    Move gdata v3 helper functions into ghes.h to avoid duplication
    Reorder the timestamp print and avoid memcpy
    Add helper functions for gdata size checking
    Rename the SEA functions
    Add helper function for GHES panics
    Set fru_id to NULL UUID at variable declaration
    Limit ARM trace event parameters to the needed structures
    Reorder the ARM trace event variables to save space
    Add comment for why we don't pass SEAs to the guest when it aborts
    Move ARM trace event call into GHES driver instead of CPER

V3: Fix unmapped address to the read_ack_register in ghes.c
    Add helper function to get the proper payload based on generic data entry
     version
    Move timestamp print to avoid changing function calls in cper.c
    Remove patch "arm64: exception: handle instruction abort at current EL"
     since the el1_ia handler is already added in 4.8
    Add EFI and ARM64 dependencies for HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
    Add a new trace event for ARM type errors
    Add support to handle KVM guest SEAs

V2: Add PSCI state print for the ARMv8 error type.
    Separate timestamp year into year and century using BCD format.
    Rebase on top of ACPICA 20160318 release and remove header file changes
     in include/acpi/actbl1.h.
    Add panic OS with fatal error status block patch.
    Add processing of unrecognized CPER error section patches with updates
     from previous comments. Original patches: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/8/646

V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/5/544

Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang (1):
  acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block

Tyler Baicar (9):
  acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption
  ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1
  efi: parse ARM processor error
  arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  efi: print unrecognized CPER section
  ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for unrecognized CPER section
  trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event
  arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support

 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h       |   1 +
 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |   5 +
 arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   |  18 ++-
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                   |   2 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h     |   1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  15 +++
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                |  71 ++++++++++--
 drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig            |  14 +++
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c             | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c             |   7 +-
 drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c          | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/ras/ras.c                    |   2 +
 include/acpi/ghes.h                  |  27 ++++-
 include/linux/cper.h                 |  54 +++++++++
 include/ras/ras_event.h              |  79 +++++++++++++
 15 files changed, 649 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 01/10] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

A RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) controller
may be a separate processor running in parallel with OS
execution, and may generate error records for consumption by
the OS. If the RAS controller produces multiple error records,
then they may be overwritten before the OS has consumed them.

The Generic Hardware Error Source (GHES) v2 structure
introduces the capability for the OS to acknowledge the
consumption of the error record generated by the RAS
controller. A RAS controller supporting GHESv2 shall wait for
the acknowledgment before writing a new error record, thus
eliminating the race condition.

Add support for parsing of GHESv2 sub-tables as well.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Ruigrok <rruigrok@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c |  7 +++++--
 include/acpi/ghes.h      |  5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 60746ef..b23160d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
 
+#include <acpi/actbl1.h>
 #include <acpi/ghes.h>
 #include <acpi/apei.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -79,6 +80,10 @@
 	((struct acpi_hest_generic_status *)				\
 	 ((struct ghes_estatus_node *)(estatus_node) + 1))
 
+#define IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2(ghes)				\
+	((struct acpi_hest_header *)ghes->generic)->type ==	\
+	 ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2
+
 /*
  * This driver isn't really modular, however for the time being,
  * continuing to use module_param is the easiest way to remain
@@ -248,10 +253,18 @@ static struct ghes *ghes_new(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic)
 	ghes = kzalloc(sizeof(*ghes), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ghes)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
 	ghes->generic = generic;
+	if (IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2(ghes)) {
+		rc = apei_map_generic_address(
+			&ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
+		if (rc)
+			goto err_free;
+	}
+
 	rc = apei_map_generic_address(&generic->error_status_address);
 	if (rc)
-		goto err_free;
+		goto err_unmap_read_ack_addr;
 	error_block_length = generic->error_block_length;
 	if (error_block_length > GHES_ESTATUS_MAX_SIZE) {
 		pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
@@ -263,13 +276,17 @@ static struct ghes *ghes_new(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic)
 	ghes->estatus = kmalloc(error_block_length, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ghes->estatus) {
 		rc = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_unmap;
+		goto err_unmap_status_addr;
 	}
 
 	return ghes;
 
-err_unmap:
+err_unmap_status_addr:
 	apei_unmap_generic_address(&generic->error_status_address);
+err_unmap_read_ack_addr:
+	if (IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2(ghes))
+		apei_unmap_generic_address(
+			&ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
 err_free:
 	kfree(ghes);
 	return ERR_PTR(rc);
@@ -279,6 +296,9 @@ static void ghes_fini(struct ghes *ghes)
 {
 	kfree(ghes->estatus);
 	apei_unmap_generic_address(&ghes->generic->error_status_address);
+	if (IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2(ghes))
+		apei_unmap_generic_address(
+			&ghes->generic_v2->read_ack_register);
 }
 
 static inline int ghes_severity(int severity)
@@ -648,6 +668,23 @@ static void ghes_estatus_cache_add(
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+static int ghes_ack_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *generic_v2)
+{
+	int rc;
+	u64 val = 0;
+
+	rc = apei_read(&val, &generic_v2->read_ack_register);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+	val &= generic_v2->read_ack_preserve <<
+		generic_v2->read_ack_register.bit_offset;
+	val |= generic_v2->read_ack_write <<
+		generic_v2->read_ack_register.bit_offset;
+	rc = apei_write(val, &generic_v2->read_ack_register);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -660,6 +697,12 @@ static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
 			ghes_estatus_cache_add(ghes->generic, ghes->estatus);
 	}
 	ghes_do_proc(ghes, ghes->estatus);
+
+	if (IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2(ghes)) {
+		rc = ghes_ack_error(ghes->generic_v2);
+		if (rc)
+			return rc;
+	}
 out:
 	ghes_clear_estatus(ghes);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
index 792a0d9..ef725a9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static const int hest_esrc_len_tab[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_RESERVED] = {
 	[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_ENDPOINT] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_aer),
 	[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_AER_BRIDGE] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_aer_bridge),
 	[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic),
+	[ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2] = sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_v2),
 };
 
 static int hest_esrc_len(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr)
@@ -146,7 +147,8 @@ static int __init hest_parse_ghes_count(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void
 {
 	int *count = data;
 
-	if (hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR)
+	if (hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR ||
+	    hest_hdr->type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2)
 		(*count)++;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -157,7 +159,8 @@ static int __init hest_parse_ghes(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
 	struct ghes_arr *ghes_arr = data;
 	int rc, i;
 
-	if (hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR)
+	if (hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR &&
+	    hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!((struct acpi_hest_generic *)hest_hdr)->enabled)
diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
index 720446c..68f088a 100644
--- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
+++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
@@ -13,7 +13,10 @@
 #define GHES_EXITING		0x0002
 
 struct ghes {
-	struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
+	union {
+		struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
+		struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *generic_v2;
+	};
 	struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
 	u64 buffer_paddr;
 	unsigned long flags;
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 01/10] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 03/10] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

Currently when a RAS error is reported it is not timestamped.
The ACPI 6.1 spec adds the timestamp field to the generic error
data entry v3 structure. The timestamp of when the firmware
generated the error is now being reported.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Ruigrok <rruigrok@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  9 ++++---
 drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/acpi/ghes.h         | 22 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index b23160d..2acbc60 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -420,7 +420,8 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
 	int flags = -1;
 	int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
 	struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
-	mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata + 1);
+
+	mem_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 
 	if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
 		return;
@@ -457,7 +458,8 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 		if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
 				 CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
 			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
-			mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
+
+			mem_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 			ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
 
 			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
@@ -467,7 +469,8 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
 				      CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
 			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
-			pcie_err = (struct cper_sec_pcie *)(gdata+1);
+
+			pcie_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 			if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
 			    sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
 			    pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID &&
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
index d425374..8fa4e23 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/aer.h>
+#include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/bcd.h>
+#include <acpi/ghes.h>
 
 #define INDENT_SP	" "
 
@@ -386,13 +389,37 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
 	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
 }
 
+static void cper_estatus_print_section_v300(const char *pfx,
+	const struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *gdata)
+{
+	__u8 hour, min, sec, day, mon, year, century, *timestamp;
+
+	if (gdata->validation_bits & ACPI_HEST_GEN_VALID_TIMESTAMP) {
+		timestamp = (__u8 *)&(gdata->time_stamp);
+		sec = bcd2bin(timestamp[0]);
+		min = bcd2bin(timestamp[1]);
+		hour = bcd2bin(timestamp[2]);
+		day = bcd2bin(timestamp[4]);
+		mon = bcd2bin(timestamp[5]);
+		year = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
+		century = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
+		printk("%stime: %7s %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
+			0x01 & *(timestamp + 3) ? "precise" : "", century,
+			year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
+	}
+}
+
 static void cper_estatus_print_section(
-	const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
+	const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no)
 {
 	uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
 	__u16 severity;
 	char newpfx[64];
 
+	if (acpi_hest_generic_data_version(gdata) >= 3)
+		cper_estatus_print_section_v300(pfx,
+			(const struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *)gdata);
+
 	severity = gdata->error_severity;
 	printk("%s""Error %d, type: %s\n", pfx, sec_no,
 	       cper_severity_str(severity));
@@ -403,14 +430,18 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
 
 	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
 	if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_GENERIC)) {
-		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
+		struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc_err;
+
+		proc_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 		printk("%s""section_type: general processor error\n", newpfx);
 		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*proc_err))
 			cper_print_proc_generic(newpfx, proc_err);
 		else
 			goto err_section_too_small;
 	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
-		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = (void *)(gdata + 1);
+		struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
+
+		mem_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 		printk("%s""section_type: memory error\n", newpfx);
 		if (gdata->error_data_length >=
 		    sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
@@ -419,7 +450,9 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
 		else
 			goto err_section_too_small;
 	} else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
-		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie = (void *)(gdata + 1);
+		struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie;
+
+		pcie = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 		printk("%s""section_type: PCIe error\n", newpfx);
 		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*pcie))
 			cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
@@ -438,7 +471,7 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
 			const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
 {
 	struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
-	unsigned int data_len, gedata_len;
+	unsigned int data_len;
 	int sec_no = 0;
 	char newpfx[64];
 	__u16 severity;
@@ -451,12 +484,13 @@ void cper_estatus_print(const char *pfx,
 	printk("%s""event severity: %s\n", pfx, cper_severity_str(severity));
 	data_len = estatus->data_length;
 	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
+
 	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
-	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
-		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
+
+	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata)) {
 		cper_estatus_print_section(newpfx, gdata, sec_no);
-		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
-		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
+		data_len -= acpi_hest_generic_data_record_size(gdata);
+		gdata = acpi_hest_generic_data_next(gdata);
 		sec_no++;
 	}
 }
@@ -486,12 +520,13 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
 		return rc;
 	data_len = estatus->data_length;
 	gdata = (struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(estatus + 1);
-	while (data_len >= sizeof(*gdata)) {
-		gedata_len = gdata->error_data_length;
-		if (gedata_len > data_len - sizeof(*gdata))
+
+	while (data_len >= acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata)) {
+		gedata_len = acpi_hest_generic_data_error_length(gdata);
+		if (gedata_len > data_len - acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		data_len -= gedata_len + sizeof(*gdata);
-		gdata = (void *)(gdata + 1) + gedata_len;
+		data_len -= gedata_len + acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata);
+		gdata = acpi_hest_generic_data_next(gdata);
 	}
 	if (data_len)
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
index 68f088a..6ae318b 100644
--- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
+++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
@@ -12,6 +12,18 @@
 #define GHES_TO_CLEAR		0x0001
 #define GHES_EXITING		0x0002
 
+#define acpi_hest_generic_data_error_length(gdata)	\
+	(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *)(gdata))->error_data_length)
+#define acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata)		\
+	((acpi_hest_generic_data_version(gdata) >= 3) ?	\
+	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300) :	\
+	sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data))
+#define acpi_hest_generic_data_record_size(gdata)	\
+	(acpi_hest_generic_data_size(gdata) +		\
+	acpi_hest_generic_data_error_length(gdata))
+#define acpi_hest_generic_data_next(gdata)		\
+	((void *)(gdata) + acpi_hest_generic_data_record_size(gdata))
+
 struct ghes {
 	union {
 		struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
@@ -73,3 +85,13 @@ static inline void ghes_edac_unregister(struct ghes *ghes)
 {
 }
 #endif
+
+#define acpi_hest_generic_data_version(gdata)			\
+	(gdata->revision >> 8)
+
+static inline void *acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
+{
+	return acpi_hest_generic_data_version(gdata) >= 3 ?
+		(void *)(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *)(gdata)) + 1) :
+		gdata + 1;
+}
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 03/10] efi: parse ARM processor error
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 01/10] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

Add support for ARM Common Platform Error Record (CPER).
UEFI 2.6 specification adds support for ARM specific
processor error information to be reported as part of the
CPER records. This provides more detail on for processor error logs.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/cper.h        |  54 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 187 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
index 8fa4e23..c2b0a12 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
@@ -110,12 +110,15 @@ void cper_print_bits(const char *pfx, unsigned int bits,
 static const char * const proc_type_strs[] = {
 	"IA32/X64",
 	"IA64",
+	"ARM",
 };
 
 static const char * const proc_isa_strs[] = {
 	"IA32",
 	"IA64",
 	"X64",
+	"ARM A32/T32",
+	"ARM A64",
 };
 
 static const char * const proc_error_type_strs[] = {
@@ -139,6 +142,18 @@ static const char * const proc_flag_strs[] = {
 	"corrected",
 };
 
+static const char * const arm_reg_ctx_strs[] = {
+	"AArch32 general purpose registers",
+	"AArch32 EL1 context registers",
+	"AArch32 EL2 context registers",
+	"AArch32 secure context registers",
+	"AArch64 general purpose registers",
+	"AArch64 EL1 context registers",
+	"AArch64 EL2 context registers",
+	"AArch64 EL3 context registers",
+	"Misc. system register structure",
+};
+
 static void cper_print_proc_generic(const char *pfx,
 				    const struct cper_sec_proc_generic *proc)
 {
@@ -184,6 +199,114 @@ static void cper_print_proc_generic(const char *pfx,
 		printk("%s""IP: 0x%016llx\n", pfx, proc->ip);
 }
 
+static void cper_print_proc_arm(const char *pfx,
+				const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc)
+{
+	int i, len, max_ctx_type;
+	struct cper_arm_err_info *err_info;
+	struct cper_arm_ctx_info *ctx_info;
+	char newpfx[64];
+
+	printk("%s""section length: %d\n", pfx, proc->section_length);
+	printk("%s""MIDR: 0x%016llx\n", pfx, proc->midr);
+
+	len = proc->section_length - (sizeof(*proc) +
+		proc->err_info_num * (sizeof(*err_info)));
+	if (len < 0) {
+		printk("%s""section length is too small\n", pfx);
+		printk("%s""firmware-generated error record is incorrect\n", pfx);
+		printk("%s""ERR_INFO_NUM is %d\n", pfx, proc->err_info_num);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (proc->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_VALID_MPIDR)
+		printk("%s""MPIDR: 0x%016llx\n", pfx, proc->mpidr);
+	if (proc->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_VALID_AFFINITY_LEVEL)
+		printk("%s""error affinity level: %d\n", pfx,
+			proc->affinity_level);
+	if (proc->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_VALID_RUNNING_STATE) {
+		printk("%s""running state: 0x%x\n", pfx, proc->running_state);
+		printk("%s""PSCI state: %d\n", pfx, proc->psci_state);
+	}
+
+	snprintf(newpfx, sizeof(newpfx), "%s%s", pfx, INDENT_SP);
+
+	err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(proc + 1);
+	for (i = 0; i < proc->err_info_num; i++) {
+		printk("%s""Error info structure %d:\n", pfx, i);
+		printk("%s""version:%d\n", newpfx, err_info->version);
+		printk("%s""length:%d\n", newpfx, err_info->length);
+		if (err_info->validation_bits &
+		    CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_MULTI_ERR) {
+			if (err_info->multiple_error == 0)
+				printk("%s""single error\n", newpfx);
+			else if (err_info->multiple_error == 1)
+				printk("%s""multiple errors\n", newpfx);
+			else
+				printk("%s""multiple errors count:%u\n",
+				newpfx, err_info->multiple_error);
+		}
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_FLAGS) {
+			if (err_info->flags & CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_FIRST)
+				printk("%s""first error captured\n", newpfx);
+			if (err_info->flags & CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_LAST)
+				printk("%s""last error captured\n", newpfx);
+			if (err_info->flags & CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED)
+				printk("%s""propagated error captured\n",
+				       newpfx);
+			if (err_info->flags & CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_OVERFLOW)
+				printk("%s""overflow occurred, error info is incomplete\n",
+				       newpfx);
+		}
+		printk("%s""error_type: %d, %s\n", newpfx, err_info->type,
+			err_info->type < ARRAY_SIZE(proc_error_type_strs) ?
+			proc_error_type_strs[err_info->type] : "unknown");
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_ERR_INFO)
+			printk("%s""error_info: 0x%016llx\n", newpfx,
+			       err_info->error_info);
+		if (err_info->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_VIRT_ADDR)
+			printk("%s""virtual fault address: 0x%016llx\n",
+				newpfx, err_info->virt_fault_addr);
+		if (err_info->validation_bits &
+		    CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDR)
+			printk("%s""physical fault address: 0x%016llx\n",
+				newpfx, err_info->physical_fault_addr);
+		err_info += 1;
+	}
+	ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)err_info;
+	max_ctx_type = ARRAY_SIZE(arm_reg_ctx_strs) - 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < proc->context_info_num; i++) {
+		int size = sizeof(*ctx_info) + ctx_info->size;
+
+		printk("%s""Context info structure %d:\n", pfx, i);
+		if (len < size) {
+			printk("%s""section length is too small\n", newpfx);
+			printk("%s""firmware-generated error record is incorrect\n", pfx);
+			return;
+		}
+		if (ctx_info->type > max_ctx_type) {
+			printk("%s""Invalid context type: %d\n", newpfx,
+							ctx_info->type);
+			printk("%s""Max context type: %d\n", newpfx,
+							max_ctx_type);
+			return;
+		}
+		printk("%s""register context type %d: %s\n", newpfx,
+			ctx_info->type, arm_reg_ctx_strs[ctx_info->type]);
+		print_hex_dump(newpfx, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 4,
+				(ctx_info + 1), ctx_info->size, 0);
+		len -= size;
+		ctx_info = (struct cper_arm_ctx_info *)((long)ctx_info + size);
+	}
+
+	if (len > 0) {
+		printk("%s""Vendor specific error info has %u bytes:\n", pfx,
+		       len);
+		print_hex_dump(newpfx, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 4, ctx_info,
+				len, 0);
+	}
+}
+
 static const char * const mem_err_type_strs[] = {
 	"unknown",
 	"no error",
@@ -458,6 +581,16 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
 			cper_print_pcie(newpfx, pcie, gdata);
 		else
 			goto err_section_too_small;
+	} else if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)) &&
+		   !uuid_le_cmp(*sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) {
+		struct cper_sec_proc_arm *arm_err;
+
+		arm_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
+		printk("%ssection_type: ARM processor error\n", newpfx);
+		if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*arm_err))
+			cper_print_proc_arm(newpfx, arm_err);
+		else
+			goto err_section_too_small;
 	} else
 		printk("%s""section type: unknown, %pUl\n", newpfx, sec_type);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/cper.h b/include/linux/cper.h
index dcacb1a..85450f3 100644
--- a/include/linux/cper.h
+++ b/include/linux/cper.h
@@ -180,6 +180,10 @@ enum {
 #define CPER_SEC_PROC_IPF						\
 	UUID_LE(0xE429FAF1, 0x3CB7, 0x11D4, 0x0B, 0xCA, 0x07, 0x00,	\
 		0x80, 0xC7, 0x3C, 0x88, 0x81)
+/* Processor Specific: ARM */
+#define CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM						\
+	UUID_LE(0xE19E3D16, 0xBC11, 0x11E4, 0x9C, 0xAA, 0xC2, 0x05,	\
+		0x1D, 0x5D, 0x46, 0xB0)
 /* Platform Memory */
 #define CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM						\
 	UUID_LE(0xA5BC1114, 0x6F64, 0x4EDE, 0xB8, 0x63, 0x3E, 0x83,	\
@@ -255,6 +259,22 @@ enum {
 
 #define CPER_PCIE_SLOT_SHIFT			3
 
+#define CPER_ARM_VALID_MPIDR			0x00000001
+#define CPER_ARM_VALID_AFFINITY_LEVEL		0x00000002
+#define CPER_ARM_VALID_RUNNING_STATE		0x00000004
+#define CPER_ARM_VALID_VENDOR_INFO		0x00000008
+
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_MULTI_ERR		0x0001
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_FLAGS		0x0002
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_ERR_INFO		0x0004
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_VIRT_ADDR		0x0008
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDR	0x0010
+
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_FIRST		0x0001
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_LAST		0x0002
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED		0x0004
+#define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_OVERFLOW		0x0008
+
 /*
  * All tables and structs must be byte-packed to match CPER
  * specification, since the tables are provided by the system BIOS
@@ -340,6 +360,40 @@ struct cper_ia_proc_ctx {
 	__u64	mm_reg_addr;
 };
 
+/* ARM Processor Error Section */
+struct cper_sec_proc_arm {
+	__u32	validation_bits;
+	__u16	err_info_num; /* Number of Processor Error Info */
+	__u16	context_info_num; /* Number of Processor Context Info Records*/
+	__u32	section_length;
+	__u8	affinity_level;
+	__u8	reserved[3];	/* must be zero */
+	__u64	mpidr;
+	__u64	midr;
+	__u32	running_state; /* Bit 0 set - Processor running. PSCI = 0 */
+	__u32	psci_state;
+};
+
+/* ARM Processor Error Information Structure */
+struct cper_arm_err_info {
+	__u8	version;
+	__u8	length;
+	__u16	validation_bits;
+	__u8	type;
+	__u16	multiple_error;
+	__u8	flags;
+	__u64	error_info;
+	__u64	virt_fault_addr;
+	__u64	physical_fault_addr;
+};
+
+/* ARM Processor Context Information Structure */
+struct cper_arm_ctx_info {
+	__u16	version;
+	__u16	type;
+	__u32	size;
+};
+
 /* Old Memory Error Section UEFI 2.1, 2.2 */
 struct cper_sec_mem_err_old {
 	__u64	validation_bits;
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 03/10] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-16 11:53   ` Will Deacon
  2017-01-17 10:31   ` James Morse
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 2 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
Code.
When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
the handlers registered in the notification list.
Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
new SEA handler is used.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 
 #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
+/*
+ * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
+ * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
+ * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
+ * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
+ * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
+ *
+ * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
+ * are not allowed to block or sleep.
+ */
+int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+
 #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 05d2bd7..81039c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -39,6 +39,22 @@
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
+/*
+ * GHES SEA handler code may register a notifier call here to
+ * handle HW error record passed from platform.
+ */
+static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(sea_handler_chain);
+
+int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
+}
+
+void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
+}
+
 static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
@@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
+ * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
+ */
+static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct siginfo info;
+
+	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
+
+	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
+		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
+
+	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
+	info.si_errno = 0;
+	info.si_code  = 0;
+	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
+	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct fault_info {
 	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
 	int	sig;
@@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
 	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 1 permission fault"	},
 	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 2 permission fault"	},
 	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 3 permission fault"	},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 17"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 18"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 19"			},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 0 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 1 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 2 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 3 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity or ECC err" },
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 25"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 26"			},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 27"			},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
-	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 0 synchronous parity error (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 1 synchronous parity error (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 2 synchronous parity error (translation table walk)"	},
+	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 3 synchronous parity error (translation table walk)"	},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 32"			},
 	{ do_alignment_fault,	SIGBUS,  BUS_ADRALN,	"alignment fault"		},
 	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 34"			},
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-18 14:50   ` James Morse
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block Tyler Baicar
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchrounous External
Abort) notification type for ARMv8.
Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
SEA exceptions when they occur.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig        |  2 ++
 drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c  | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index b380c87..0465601 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ config ARM64
 	select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ
 	select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
 	select HAVE_ACPI_APEI if (ACPI && EFI)
+	select HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA if (ACPI && EFI)
+	select HAVE_NMI if HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
 	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
 	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
index b0140c8..3786ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,20 @@ config HAVE_ACPI_APEI
 config HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
 	bool
 
+config HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
+	bool "APEI Synchronous External Abort logging/recovering support"
+	depends on ARM64
+	help
+	  This option should be enabled if the system supports
+	  firmware first handling of SEA (Synchronous External Abort).
+	  SEA happens with certain faults of data abort or instruction
+	  abort synchronous exceptions on ARMv8 systems. If a system
+	  supports firmware first handling of SEA, the platform analyzes
+	  and handles hardware error notifications with SEA, and it may then
+	  form a HW error record for the OS to parse and handle. This
+	  option allows the OS to look for such HW error record, and
+	  take appropriate action.
+
 config ACPI_APEI
 	bool "ACPI Platform Error Interface (APEI)"
 	select MISC_FILESYSTEMS
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 2acbc60..87efe26 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -44,12 +44,17 @@
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
 
 #include <acpi/actbl1.h>
 #include <acpi/ghes.h>
 #include <acpi/apei.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
+#include <asm/system_misc.h>
+#endif
+
 #include "apei-internal.h"
 
 #define GHES_PFX	"GHES: "
@@ -767,6 +772,62 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sci = {
 	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sci,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
+static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
+
+static int ghes_notify_sea(struct notifier_block *this,
+				  unsigned long event, void *data)
+{
+	struct ghes *ghes;
+	int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	nmi_enter();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, &ghes_sea, list) {
+		if (!ghes_proc(ghes))
+			ret = NOTIFY_OK;
+	}
+	nmi_exit();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sea = {
+	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sea,
+};
+
+static int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	if (list_empty(&ghes_sea))
+		register_sea_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sea);
+	list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sea);
+	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	list_del_rcu(&ghes->list);
+	if (list_empty(&ghes_sea))
+		unregister_sea_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sea);
+	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
+static inline int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
+	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
+	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
 /*
  * printk is not safe in NMI context.  So in NMI handler, we allocate
@@ -1011,6 +1072,14 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL:
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI:
 		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
+		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
+			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via SEA is not supported\n",
+				generic->header.source_id);
+			rc = -ENOTSUPP;
+			goto err;
+		}
+		break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
 		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI)) {
 			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via NMI interrupt is not supported!\n",
@@ -1022,6 +1091,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 		pr_warning(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via local interrupt is not supported!\n",
 			   generic->header.source_id);
 		goto err;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO:
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV:
+		pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via notification type %u is not supported\n",
+			generic->header.source_id, generic->header.source_id);
+		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
+		goto err;
 	default:
 		pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX "Unknown notification type: %u for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
 			   generic->notify.type, generic->header.source_id);
@@ -1076,6 +1152,11 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 		list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sci);
 		mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
 		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
+		rc = ghes_sea_add(ghes);
+		if (rc)
+			goto err_edac_unreg;
+		break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
 		ghes_nmi_add(ghes);
 		break;
@@ -1118,6 +1199,9 @@ static int ghes_remove(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 			unregister_acpi_hed_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sci);
 		mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
 		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
+		ghes_sea_remove(ghes);
+		break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
 		ghes_nmi_remove(ghes);
 		break;
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 07/10] efi: print unrecognized CPER section Tyler Baicar
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>

Even if an error status block's severity is fatal, the kernel does not
honor the severity level and panic.

With the firmware first model, the platform could inform the OS about a
fatal hardware error through the non-NMI GHES notification type. The OS
should panic when a hardware error record is received with this
severity.

Call panic() after CPER data in error status block is printed if
severity is fatal, before each error section is handled.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 87efe26..4e9a20d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ static unsigned long ghes_estatus_pool_size_request;
 static struct ghes_estatus_cache *ghes_estatus_caches[GHES_ESTATUS_CACHES_SIZE];
 static atomic_t ghes_estatus_cache_alloced;
 
+static int ghes_panic_timeout __read_mostly = 30;
+
 static int ghes_ioremap_init(void)
 {
 	ghes_ioremap_area = __get_vm_area(PAGE_SIZE * GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES,
@@ -693,6 +695,13 @@ static int ghes_ack_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_v2 *generic_v2)
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static void __ghes_call_panic(void)
+{
+	if (panic_timeout == 0)
+		panic_timeout = ghes_panic_timeout;
+	panic("Fatal hardware error!");
+}
+
 static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -704,6 +713,10 @@ static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
 		if (ghes_print_estatus(NULL, ghes->generic, ghes->estatus))
 			ghes_estatus_cache_add(ghes->generic, ghes->estatus);
 	}
+	if (ghes_severity(ghes->estatus->error_severity) >= GHES_SEV_PANIC) {
+		__ghes_call_panic();
+	}
+
 	ghes_do_proc(ghes, ghes->estatus);
 
 	if (IS_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_V2(ghes)) {
@@ -848,8 +861,6 @@ static atomic_t ghes_in_nmi = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 static LIST_HEAD(ghes_nmi);
 
-static int ghes_panic_timeout	__read_mostly = 30;
-
 static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 {
 	struct llist_node *llnode, *next;
@@ -942,9 +953,7 @@ static void __ghes_panic(struct ghes *ghes)
 	__ghes_print_estatus(KERN_EMERG, ghes->generic, ghes->estatus);
 
 	/* reboot to log the error! */
-	if (panic_timeout == 0)
-		panic_timeout = ghes_panic_timeout;
-	panic("Fatal hardware error!");
+	__ghes_call_panic();
 }
 
 static int ghes_notify_nmi(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 07/10] efi: print unrecognized CPER section
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 08/10] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for " Tyler Baicar
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

UEFI spec allows for non-standard section in Common Platform Error
Record. This is defined in section N.2.3 of UEFI version 2.5.

Currently if the CPER section's type (UUID) does not match with
one of the section types that the kernel knows how to parse, the
section is skipped. Therefore, user is not able to see
such CPER data, for instance, error record of non-standard section.

For above mentioned case, this change prints out the raw data in
hex in dmesg buffer. Data length is taken from Error Data length
field of Generic Error Data Entry.

Following is a sample output from dmesg:
[  115.771702] {1}[Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 2
[  115.779042] {1}[Hardware Error]: It has been corrected by h/w and requires no further action
[  115.787456] {1}[Hardware Error]: event severity: corrected
[  115.792927] {1}[Hardware Error]:  Error 0, type: corrected
[  115.798415] {1}[Hardware Error]:  fru_id: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
[  115.805596] {1}[Hardware Error]:  fru_text:
[  115.816105] {1}[Hardware Error]:  section type: d2e2621c-f936-468d-0d84-15a4ed015c8b
[  115.823880] {1}[Hardware Error]:  section length: 88
[  115.828779] {1}[Hardware Error]:   00000000: 01000001 00000002 5f434345 525f4543
[  115.836153] {1}[Hardware Error]:   00000010: 0000574d 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  115.843531] {1}[Hardware Error]:   00000020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  115.850908] {1}[Hardware Error]:   00000030: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  115.858288] {1}[Hardware Error]:   00000040: fe800000 00000000 00000004 5f434345
[  115.865665] {1}[Hardware Error]:   00000050: 525f4543 0000574d

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
index c2b0a12..48cb8ee 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
@@ -591,8 +591,16 @@ static void cper_estatus_print_section(
 			cper_print_proc_arm(newpfx, arm_err);
 		else
 			goto err_section_too_small;
-	} else
-		printk("%s""section type: unknown, %pUl\n", newpfx, sec_type);
+	} else {
+		const void *unknown_err;
+
+		unknown_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
+		printk("%ssection type: %pUl\n", newpfx, sec_type);
+		printk("%ssection length: %d\n", newpfx,
+		       gdata->error_data_length);
+		print_hex_dump(newpfx, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 4,
+			       unknown_err, gdata->error_data_length, 0);
+	}
 
 	return;
 
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 08/10] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for unrecognized CPER section
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 07/10] efi: print unrecognized CPER section Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 09/10] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

UEFI spec allows for non-standard section in Common Platform Error
Record. This is defined in section N.2.3 of UEFI version 2.5.

Currently if the CPER section's type (UUID) does not match with
any section type that the kernel knows how to parse, trace event
is not generated for such section. And thus user is not able to know
happening of such hardware error, including error record of
non-standard section.

This commit generates a trace event which contains raw error data
for unrecognized CPER section.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/ras/ras.c        |  1 +
 include/ras/ras_event.h  | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 4e9a20d..a32c1b1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -45,11 +45,13 @@
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
 
 #include <acpi/actbl1.h>
 #include <acpi/ghes.h>
 #include <acpi/apei.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#include <ras/ras_event.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
 #include <asm/system_misc.h>
@@ -458,11 +460,21 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 {
 	int sev, sec_sev;
 	struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
+	uuid_le sec_type;
+	uuid_le *fru_id = &NULL_UUID_LE;
+	char *fru_text = "";
 
 	sev = ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity);
 	apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata) {
 		sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
-		if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
+		sec_type = *(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
+
+		if (gdata->validation_bits & CPER_SEC_VALID_FRU_ID)
+			fru_id = (uuid_le *)gdata->fru_id;
+		if (gdata->validation_bits & CPER_SEC_VALID_FRU_TEXT)
+			fru_text = gdata->fru_text;
+
+		if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type,
 				 CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
 			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
 
@@ -473,7 +485,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 			ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev);
 		}
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
-		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
+		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type,
 				      CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
 			struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
 
@@ -506,6 +518,12 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 
 		}
 #endif
+		else {
+			void *unknown_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
+			trace_unknown_sec_event(&sec_type,
+					fru_id, fru_text, sec_sev,
+					unknown_err, gdata->error_data_length);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
index b67dd36..fb2500b 100644
--- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
+++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
@@ -27,3 +27,4 @@ subsys_initcall(ras_init);
 EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(extlog_mem_event);
 #endif
 EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(mc_event);
+EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(unknown_sec_event);
diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
index 1791a12..5861b6f 100644
--- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
+++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
@@ -162,6 +162,51 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mc_event,
 );
 
 /*
+ * Unknown Section Report
+ *
+ * This event is generated when hardware detected a hardware
+ * error event, which may be of non-standard section as defined
+ * in UEFI spec appendix "Common Platform Error Record", or may
+ * be of sections for which TRACE_EVENT is not defined.
+ *
+ */
+TRACE_EVENT(unknown_sec_event,
+
+	TP_PROTO(const uuid_le *sec_type,
+		 const uuid_le *fru_id,
+		 const char *fru_text,
+		 const u8 sev,
+		 const u8 *err,
+		 const u32 len),
+
+	TP_ARGS(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text, sev, err, len),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__array(char, sec_type, 16)
+		__array(char, fru_id, 16)
+		__string(fru_text, fru_text)
+		__field(u8, sev)
+		__field(u32, len)
+		__dynamic_array(u8, buf, len)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		memcpy(__entry->sec_type, sec_type, sizeof(uuid_le));
+		memcpy(__entry->fru_id, fru_id, sizeof(uuid_le));
+		__assign_str(fru_text, fru_text);
+		__entry->sev = sev;
+		__entry->len = len;
+		memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(buf), err, len);
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("severity: %d; sec type:%pU; FRU: %pU %s; data len:%d; raw data:%s",
+		  __entry->sev, __entry->sec_type,
+		  __entry->fru_id, __get_str(fru_text),
+		  __entry->len,
+		  __print_hex(__get_dynamic_array(buf), __entry->len))
+);
+
+/*
  * PCIe AER Trace event
  *
  * These events are generated when hardware detects a corrected or
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 09/10] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 08/10] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for " Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

Currently there are trace events for the various RAS
errors with the exception of ARM processor type errors.
Add a new trace event for such errors so that the user
will know when they occur. These trace events are
consistent with the ARM processor error section type
defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c    |  7 ++++++-
 drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c |  1 +
 drivers/ras/ras.c           |  1 +
 include/ras/ras_event.h     | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index a32c1b1..324a032 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -518,7 +518,12 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 
 		}
 #endif
-		else {
+		else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) {
+			struct cper_sec_proc_arm *arm_err;
+
+			arm_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
+			trace_arm_event(arm_err);
+		} else {
 			void *unknown_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
 			trace_unknown_sec_event(&sec_type,
 					fru_id, fru_text, sec_sev,
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
index 48cb8ee..0ec678e 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <linux/printk.h>
 #include <linux/bcd.h>
 #include <acpi/ghes.h>
+#include <ras/ras_event.h>
 
 #define INDENT_SP	" "
 
diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
index fb2500b..8ba5a94 100644
--- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
+++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
@@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(extlog_mem_event);
 #endif
 EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(mc_event);
 EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(unknown_sec_event);
+EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_event);
diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
index 5861b6f..b36db48 100644
--- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
+++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
@@ -162,6 +162,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mc_event,
 );
 
 /*
+ * ARM Processor Events Report
+ *
+ * This event is generated when hardware detects an ARM processor error
+ * has occurred. UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
+ */
+TRACE_EVENT(arm_event,
+
+	TP_PROTO(const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc),
+
+	TP_ARGS(proc),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(u64, mpidr)
+		__field(u64, midr)
+		__field(u32, running_state)
+		__field(u32, psci_state)
+		__field(u8, affinity)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->affinity = proc->affinity_level;
+		__entry->mpidr = proc->mpidr;
+		__entry->midr = proc->midr;
+		__entry->running_state = proc->running_state;
+		__entry->psci_state = proc->psci_state;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("affinity level: %d; MPIDR: %016llx; MIDR: %016llx; "
+		  "running state: %d; PSCI state: %d",
+		  __entry->affinity, __entry->mpidr, __entry->midr,
+		  __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
+);
+
+/*
  * Unknown Section Report
  *
  * This event is generated when hardware detected a hardware
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support
  2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 09/10] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-12 18:15 ` Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-16 11:58   ` Marc Zyngier
  9 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Baicar @ 2017-01-12 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose
  Cc: Tyler Baicar

Currently external aborts are unsupported by the guest abort
handling. Add handling for SEAs so that the host kernel reports
SEAs which occur in the guest kernel.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h       |  1 +
 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  5 +++++
 arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h     |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 13 +++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
index e22089f..33a77509 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@
 #define FSC_FAULT	(0x04)
 #define FSC_ACCESS	(0x08)
 #define FSC_PERM	(0x0c)
+#define FSC_EXTABT	(0x10)
 
 /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
 #define HPFAR_MASK	(~0xf)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
index a3d61ad..ea45d94 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -24,4 +24,9 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
 
 #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 
+static inline int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+
 #endif /* __ASM_ARM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
index e9a5c0e..1152966 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
 #include <asm/virt.h>
+#include <asm/system_misc.h>
 
 #include "trace.h"
 
@@ -1441,8 +1442,21 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 
 	/* Check the stage-2 fault is trans. fault or write fault */
 	fault_status = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_type(vcpu);
-	if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
-	    fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
+
+	/* The host kernel will handle the synchronous external abort. There
+	 * is no need to pass the error into the guest.
+	 */
+	if (fault_status == FSC_EXTABT) {
+		if(handle_guest_sea((unsigned long)fault_ipa,
+				    kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu))) {
+			kvm_err("Failed to handle guest SEA, FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
+				kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
+				(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
+				(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+	} else if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
+		   fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
 		kvm_err("Unsupported FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
 			kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
 			(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
index 4b5c977..be0efb6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
 #define FSC_FAULT	ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT
 #define FSC_ACCESS	ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS
 #define FSC_PERM	ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM
+#define FSC_EXTABT	ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT
 
 /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
 #define HPFAR_MASK	(~UL(0xf))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index e7f3440..27816cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -77,4 +77,6 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
 void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
 
+int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr);
+
 #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 81039c7..fa8d4d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -597,6 +597,19 @@ static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Handle Synchronous External Aborts that occur in a guest kernel.
+ */
+int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
+
+	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
+		fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
  * Dispatch a data abort to the relevant handler.
  */
 asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-16 11:53   ` Will Deacon
  2017-01-16 20:09     ` Baicar, Tyler
  2017-01-17 10:23     ` James Morse
  2017-01-17 10:31   ` James Morse
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2017-01-16 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tyler Baicar
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore, lv.zheng, nkaje,
	zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
> Code.
> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
> the handlers registered in the notification list.
> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
> new SEA handler is used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> @@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>  
>  #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>  
> +/*
> + * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
> + * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
> + * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
> + * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
> + * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
> + *
> + * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
> + * are not allowed to block or sleep.
> + */
> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);

I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register
precisely one hook in the series.

>  #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 05d2bd7..81039c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,22 @@
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  
> +/*
> + * GHES SEA handler code may register a notifier call here to
> + * handle HW error record passed from platform.
> + */
> +static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(sea_handler_chain);
> +
> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
> +}
> +
> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
> +}
> +
>  static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
> + */
> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	struct siginfo info;
> +
> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
> +
> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
> +		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
> +
> +	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> +	info.si_errno = 0;
> +	info.si_code  = 0;
> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
> +	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct fault_info {
>  	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  	int	sig;
> @@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
>  	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 1 permission fault"	},
>  	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 2 permission fault"	},
>  	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 3 permission fault"	},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 17"			},
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 18"			},
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 19"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error"	},
> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 0 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 1 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 2 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 3 SEA (translation table walk)"	},

Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my previous review, but please expand the
acronym for strings and comments.

> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity or ECC err" },

s/err/error/

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-16 11:58   ` Marc Zyngier
  2017-01-16 20:14     ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2017-01-16 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tyler Baicar, christoffer.dall, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> Currently external aborts are unsupported by the guest abort
> handling. Add handling for SEAs so that the host kernel reports
> SEAs which occur in the guest kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h       |  1 +
>  arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  5 +++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h     |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 13 +++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> index e22089f..33a77509 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@
>  #define FSC_FAULT	(0x04)
>  #define FSC_ACCESS	(0x08)
>  #define FSC_PERM	(0x0c)
> +#define FSC_EXTABT	(0x10)
>  
>  /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
>  #define HPFAR_MASK	(~0xf)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
> index a3d61ad..ea45d94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
> @@ -24,4 +24,9 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
>  
>  #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>  
> +static inline int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
> +{
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ASM_ARM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index e9a5c0e..1152966 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
> +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  
>  #include "trace.h"
>  
> @@ -1441,8 +1442,21 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  
>  	/* Check the stage-2 fault is trans. fault or write fault */
>  	fault_status = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_type(vcpu);
> -	if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
> -	    fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
> +
> +	/* The host kernel will handle the synchronous external abort. There
> +	 * is no need to pass the error into the guest.
> +	 */
> +	if (fault_status == FSC_EXTABT) {
> +		if(handle_guest_sea((unsigned long)fault_ipa,
> +				    kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu))) {
> +			kvm_err("Failed to handle guest SEA, FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
> +				kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
> +				(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
> +				(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));

So there's one thing I don't like here, which is that we just gave the
guest a very nice way to pollute the host's kernel log with spurious
messages. So I'd rather make it silent, or at the very least rate limited.

> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		}
> +	} else if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
> +		   fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
>  		kvm_err("Unsupported FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
>  			kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
>  			(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> index 4b5c977..be0efb6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
>  #define FSC_FAULT	ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT
>  #define FSC_ACCESS	ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS
>  #define FSC_PERM	ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM
> +#define FSC_EXTABT	ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT
>  
>  /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
>  #define HPFAR_MASK	(~UL(0xf))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> index e7f3440..27816cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> @@ -77,4 +77,6 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>  int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>  void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>  
> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr);
> +
>  #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 81039c7..fa8d4d7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -597,6 +597,19 @@ static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Handle Synchronous External Aborts that occur in a guest kernel.
> + */
> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
> +{
> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
> +
> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
> +		fault_name(esr), esr, addr);

Same here.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Dispatch a data abort to the relevant handler.
>   */
>  asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-16 11:53   ` Will Deacon
@ 2017-01-16 20:09     ` Baicar, Tyler
  2017-01-17 10:27       ` Will Deacon
  2017-01-17 10:23     ` James Morse
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-16 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore, lv.zheng, nkaje,
	zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hello Will,


On 1/16/2017 4:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>> Code.
>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>> new SEA handler is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>   2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> @@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>>   
>>   #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
>> + * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
>> + * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
>> + * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
>> + * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
>> + *
>> + * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
>> + * are not allowed to block or sleep.
>> + */
>> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register
> precisely one hook in the series.
I didn't see a response to my last comment on the previous series so I 
just left it in for this series.
The notifier usage is consistent with the GHES code for SCI errors which 
are also only used a single
time in the code. If you think making the call directly is a better 
option I will remove the notifiers.
>>   #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 05d2bd7..81039c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,22 @@
>>   #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>   #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * GHES SEA handler code may register a notifier call here to
>> + * handle HW error record passed from platform.
>> + */
>> +static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(sea_handler_chain);
>> +
>> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> +	return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> +	atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>> + */
>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +	struct siginfo info;
>> +
>> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>> +
>> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>> +		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>> +
>> +	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>> +	info.si_errno = 0;
>> +	info.si_code  = 0;
>> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>> +	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct fault_info {
>>   	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>>   	int	sig;
>> @@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
>>   	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 1 permission fault"	},
>>   	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 2 permission fault"	},
>>   	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 3 permission fault"	},
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>>   	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 17"			},
>>   	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 18"			},
>>   	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 19"			},
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 0 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 1 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 2 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 3 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
> Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my previous review, but please expand the
> acronym for strings and comments.
Sorry, I will expand these.
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity or ECC err" },
> s/err/error/
>
> Will
Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support
  2017-01-16 11:58   ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2017-01-16 20:14     ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-16 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier, christoffer.dall, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm,
	eun.taik.lee, sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hello Marc,


On 1/16/2017 4:58 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> Currently external aborts are unsupported by the guest abort
>> handling. Add handling for SEAs so that the host kernel reports
>> SEAs which occur in the guest kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h       |  1 +
>>   arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  5 +++++
>>   arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h     |  1 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 ++
>>   arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> index e22089f..33a77509 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@
>>   #define FSC_FAULT	(0x04)
>>   #define FSC_ACCESS	(0x08)
>>   #define FSC_PERM	(0x0c)
>> +#define FSC_EXTABT	(0x10)
>>   
>>   /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
>>   #define HPFAR_MASK	(~0xf)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> index a3d61ad..ea45d94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> @@ -24,4 +24,9 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
>>   
>>   #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>>   
>> +static inline int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
>> +{
>> +	return -1;
>> +}
>> +
>>   #endif /* __ASM_ARM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> index e9a5c0e..1152966 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>   #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>>   #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>>   #include <asm/virt.h>
>> +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
>>   
>>   #include "trace.h"
>>   
>> @@ -1441,8 +1442,21 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>   
>>   	/* Check the stage-2 fault is trans. fault or write fault */
>>   	fault_status = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_type(vcpu);
>> -	if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
>> -	    fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
>> +
>> +	/* The host kernel will handle the synchronous external abort. There
>> +	 * is no need to pass the error into the guest.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (fault_status == FSC_EXTABT) {
>> +		if(handle_guest_sea((unsigned long)fault_ipa,
>> +				    kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu))) {
>> +			kvm_err("Failed to handle guest SEA, FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
>> +				kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
>> +				(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
>> +				(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
> So there's one thing I don't like here, which is that we just gave the
> guest a very nice way to pollute the host's kernel log with spurious
> messages. So I'd rather make it silent, or at the very least rate limited.
Before this patch, if a guest exits with FSC_EXTABT, then the below 
print for
"Unsupported FSC..." would happen. So this print isn't really adding any 
noise
that isn't already there. Also, this print would only happen if 
handle_guest_sea
fails. If you still think this print should be removed then I will 
remove it though.
>> +			return -EFAULT;
>> +		}
>> +	} else if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
>> +		   fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
>>   		kvm_err("Unsupported FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
>>   			kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
>>   			(unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> index 4b5c977..be0efb6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
>>   #define FSC_FAULT	ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT
>>   #define FSC_ACCESS	ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS
>>   #define FSC_PERM	ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM
>> +#define FSC_EXTABT	ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT
>>   
>>   /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
>>   #define HPFAR_MASK	(~UL(0xf))
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> index e7f3440..27816cb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> @@ -77,4 +77,6 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>>   int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>   void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>   
>> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr);
>> +
>>   #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 81039c7..fa8d4d7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -597,6 +597,19 @@ static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr)
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> + * Handle Synchronous External Aborts that occur in a guest kernel.
>> + */
>> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
>> +{
>> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>> +
>> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>> +		fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
> Same here.
I will remove this print.
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>>    * Dispatch a data abort to the relevant handler.
>>    */
>>   asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>
> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-16 11:53   ` Will Deacon
  2017-01-16 20:09     ` Baicar, Tyler
@ 2017-01-17 10:23     ` James Morse
  2017-01-18 22:52       ` Baicar, Tyler
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-17 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tyler Baicar
  Cc: Will Deacon, christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar,
	linux, catalin.marinas, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore, lv.zheng,
	nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 16/01/17 11:53, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>> Code.
>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>> new SEA handler is used.

>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 05d2bd7..81039c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>> + */
>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +	struct siginfo info;
>> +
>> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>> +
>> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>> +		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>> +
>> +	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>> +	info.si_errno = 0;
>> +	info.si_code  = 0;
>> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>> +	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static const struct fault_info {
>>  	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>>  	int	sig;
>> @@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
>>  	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 1 permission fault"	},
>>  	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 2 permission fault"	},
>>  	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 3 permission fault"	},
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>>  	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 17"			},
>>  	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 18"			},
>>  	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 19"			},
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 0 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 1 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 2 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 3 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
> 
> Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my previous review, but please expand the
> acronym for strings and comments.


The 'SEA' in this user-string doesn't add anything. Now that these use do_sea()
instead of do_bad(), when they are printed won't it be:
> Synchronous External Abort: level 3 SEA (translation table walk) (...) at ....



Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-16 20:09     ` Baicar, Tyler
@ 2017-01-17 10:27       ` Will Deacon
  2017-01-18 22:53         ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2017-01-17 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baicar, Tyler
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore, lv.zheng, nkaje,
	zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0700, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 1/16/2017 4:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> >>SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
> >>error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
> >>exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
> >>Code.
> >>When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
> >>the handlers registered in the notification list.
> >>Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
> >>new SEA handler is used.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> >>Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
> >>Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
> >>---
> >>  arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
> >>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> >>index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> >>@@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
> >>  #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> >>+/*
> >>+ * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
> >>+ * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
> >>+ * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
> >>+ * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
> >>+ * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
> >>+ *
> >>+ * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
> >>+ * are not allowed to block or sleep.
> >>+ */
> >>+int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >>+void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register
> >precisely one hook in the series.
> I didn't see a response to my last comment on the previous series so I just
> left it in for this series.
> The notifier usage is consistent with the GHES code for SCI errors which are
> also only used a single
> time in the code. If you think making the call directly is a better option I
> will remove the notifiers.

Yes, please. It's easy to add the notifier infrastructure back if/when it's
actually needed and I don't see why the low-level fault dispatching needs to
be consistent with the GHES/SCI code.

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
  2017-01-16 11:53   ` Will Deacon
@ 2017-01-17 10:31   ` James Morse
  2017-01-18 23:26     ` Baicar, Tyler
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-17 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tyler Baicar
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
> Code.
> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
> the handlers registered in the notification list.
> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
> new SEA handler is used.

> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
> + */
> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	struct siginfo info;
> +
> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
> +
> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
> +		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
> +
> +	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> +	info.si_errno = 0;
> +	info.si_code  = 0;

Half of the other do_*() functions in this file read the signo and code from the
fault_info table.


> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;

addr here was read from FAR_EL1, but for some of the classes of exception you
have listed below this register isn't updated with the faulting address.

The ARM-ARM version 'k' in D1.10.5 "Summary of registers on faults taken to an
Exception level that is using Aarch64" has:
> The architecture permits that the FAR_ELx is UNKNOWN for Synchronous External
> Aborts other than Synchronous External Aborts on Translation Table Walks. In
> this case, the ISS.FnV bit returned in ESR_ELx  indicates whether FAR_ELx is
> valid.

This is a problem if we get 'synchronous external abort' or 'synchronous parity
error' while a user space process was running.


> +	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct fault_info {
>  	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>  	int	sig;


Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
@ 2017-01-18 14:50   ` James Morse
  2017-01-18 23:51     ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-18 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tyler Baicar
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchrounous External

Nit: Synchronous

> Abort) notification type for ARMv8.
> Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
> source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
> into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
> SEA exceptions when they occur.

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 2acbc60..87efe26 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -767,6 +772,62 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sci = {
>  	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sci,
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> +static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
> +
> +static int ghes_notify_sea(struct notifier_block *this,
> +				  unsigned long event, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct ghes *ghes;
> +	int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
> +

> +	nmi_enter();

Can we move this into the arch code? Its because we got here from a
synchronous-exception that makes this nmi-like, I think it only makes sense for
it be called from under /arch/.


Where did the rcu_read_lock() go? I can see its missing from ghes_notify_nmi()
too, but I don't know enough about RCU to know if that's safe!

The second paragraph in the comment above rcu_read_lock() describes it as
preventing call_rcu() during a read-side critical section that was running
concurrently. Doesn't this mean we can race with ghes_sea_remove() on another
CPU because we wait for the wrong grace period?

The same comment talks about how these read-side critical sections can nest, so
I think its quite safe to make these 'lock' calls here.


> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, &ghes_sea, list) {
> +		if (!ghes_proc(ghes))
> +			ret = NOTIFY_OK;
> +	}
> +	nmi_exit();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sea = {
> +	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sea,
> +};
> +
> +static int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
> +	if (list_empty(&ghes_sea))
> +		register_sea_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sea);
> +	list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sea);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
> +	list_del_rcu(&ghes->list);
> +	if (list_empty(&ghes_sea))
> +		unregister_sea_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sea);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);

ghes_nmi_remove() has:
>	/*
>  	* To synchronize with NMI handler, ghes can only be
>  	* freed after NMI handler finishes.
> 	*/
> 	synchronize_rcu()

This 'waits until a grace period has elapsed'. This is because ghes_remove()
goes and kfree()s the ghes object while another CPU may be holding that entry in
the list in ghes_notify_sea().


> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
> +static inline int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> +	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
> +	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
> +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> +	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
> +	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
>  /*
>   * printk is not safe in NMI context.  So in NMI handler, we allocate
> @@ -1011,6 +1072,14 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
>  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL:
>  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI:
>  		break;
> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
> +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
> +			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via SEA is not supported\n",
> +				generic->header.source_id);
> +			rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +		break;
>  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
>  		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI)) {
>  			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via NMI interrupt is not supported!\n",
> @@ -1022,6 +1091,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
>  		pr_warning(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via local interrupt is not supported!\n",
>  			   generic->header.source_id);
>  		goto err;


> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO:
> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV:

These three weren't mentioned in the commit message. I guess they are drive-by
cleanup?


> +		pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via notification type %u is not supported\n",
> +			generic->header.source_id, generic->header.source_id);
> +		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> +		goto err;
>  	default:
>  		pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX "Unknown notification type: %u for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
>  			   generic->notify.type, generic->header.source_id);


Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-17 10:23     ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-18 22:52       ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-18 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: Will Deacon, christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar,
	linux, catalin.marinas, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore, lv.zheng,
	nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On 1/17/2017 3:23 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 16/01/17 11:53, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>>> Code.
>>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>>> new SEA handler is used.
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> index 05d2bd7..81039c7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   	return 1;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +/*
>>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>>> + */
>>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct siginfo info;
>>> +
>>> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>>> +
>>> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>>> +		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>>> +
>>> +	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>>> +	info.si_errno = 0;
>>> +	info.si_code  = 0;
>>> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>>> +	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static const struct fault_info {
>>>   	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>>>   	int	sig;
>>> @@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
>>>   	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 1 permission fault"	},
>>>   	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 2 permission fault"	},
>>>   	{ do_page_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR,	"level 3 permission fault"	},
>>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous external abort"	},
>>>   	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 17"			},
>>>   	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 18"			},
>>>   	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"unknown 19"			},
>>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>>> -	{ do_bad,		SIGBUS,  0,		"synchronous parity error"	},
>>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 0 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 1 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 2 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>>> +	{ do_sea,		SIGBUS,  0,		"level 3 SEA (translation table walk)"	},
>> Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my previous review, but please expand the
>> acronym for strings and comments.
>
> The 'SEA' in this user-string doesn't add anything. Now that these use do_sea()
> instead of do_bad(), when they are printed won't it be:
>> Synchronous External Abort: level 3 SEA (translation table walk) (...) at ....

Good point, yes they will:

+	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
+		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);

I can just remove SEA here then.

Thanks,
Tyler


-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-17 10:27       ` Will Deacon
@ 2017-01-18 22:53         ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-18 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore, lv.zheng, nkaje,
	zjzhang, mark.rutland, james.morse, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On 1/17/2017 3:27 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0700, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> On 1/16/2017 4:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>>>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>>>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>>>> Code.
>>>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>>>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>>>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>>>> new SEA handler is used.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
>>>>   arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>   2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>>> index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>>> @@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>>>>   #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
>>>> + * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
>>>> + * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
>>>> + * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
>>>> + * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
>>>> + * are not allowed to block or sleep.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>>> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>> I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register
>>> precisely one hook in the series.
>> I didn't see a response to my last comment on the previous series so I just
>> left it in for this series.
>> The notifier usage is consistent with the GHES code for SCI errors which are
>> also only used a single
>> time in the code. If you think making the call directly is a better option I
>> will remove the notifiers.
> Yes, please. It's easy to add the notifier infrastructure back if/when it's
> actually needed and I don't see why the low-level fault dispatching needs to
> be consistent with the GHES/SCI code.
>
> Will
Sounds good, I will remove the notifier in the next patchset.

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-17 10:31   ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-18 23:26     ` Baicar, Tyler
  2017-01-19 17:55       ` James Morse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-18 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hello James,


On 1/17/2017 3:31 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>> Code.
>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>> new SEA handler is used.
>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>> + */
>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +	struct siginfo info;
>> +
>> +	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>> +
>> +	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>> +		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>> +
>> +	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>> +	info.si_errno = 0;
>> +	info.si_code  = 0;
> Half of the other do_*() functions in this file read the signo and code from the
> fault_info table.
>
>
>> +	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
> addr here was read from FAR_EL1, but for some of the classes of exception you
> have listed below this register isn't updated with the faulting address.
>
> The ARM-ARM version 'k' in D1.10.5 "Summary of registers on faults taken to an
> Exception level that is using Aarch64" has:
>> The architecture permits that the FAR_ELx is UNKNOWN for Synchronous External
>> Aborts other than Synchronous External Aborts on Translation Table Walks. In
>> this case, the ISS.FnV bit returned in ESR_ELx  indicates whether FAR_ELx is
>> valid.
> This is a problem if we get 'synchronous external abort' or 'synchronous parity
> error' while a user space process was running.
It looks like this would just cause an incorrect address to be printed 
in the above pr_err.
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see arm64_notify_die or anything 
that gets called from
there using the info.si_addr variable.

What do you suggest I do here? The firmware should be reporting the 
physical and virtual
address information if it is available in the HEST entry that the kernel 
will parse. So should I
just remove the use of the addr parameter in do_sea?

Thanks,
Tyler
>> +	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct fault_info {
>>   	int	(*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>>   	int	sig;
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-18 14:50   ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-18 23:51     ` Baicar, Tyler
  2017-01-19 17:57       ` James Morse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-18 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hello James,


On 1/18/2017 7:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchrounous External
> Nit: Synchronous
I'll fix that :)
>> Abort) notification type for ARMv8.
>> Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
>> source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
>> into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
>> SEA exceptions when they occur.
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index 2acbc60..87efe26 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -767,6 +772,62 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sci = {
>>   	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sci,
>>   };
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>> +static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
>> +
>> +static int ghes_notify_sea(struct notifier_block *this,
>> +				  unsigned long event, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct ghes *ghes;
>> +	int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +	nmi_enter();
> Can we move this into the arch code? Its because we got here from a
> synchronous-exception that makes this nmi-like, I think it only makes sense for
> it be called from under /arch/.
So move the nmi_enter/exit calls into do_sea of the previous patch? I 
can do that in the next patchset.
> Where did the rcu_read_lock() go? I can see its missing from ghes_notify_nmi()
> too, but I don't know enough about RCU to know if that's safe!
>
> The second paragraph in the comment above rcu_read_lock() describes it as
> preventing call_rcu() during a read-side critical section that was running
> concurrently. Doesn't this mean we can race with ghes_sea_remove() on another
> CPU because we wait for the wrong grace period?
>
> The same comment talks about how these read-side critical sections can nest, so
> I think its quite safe to make these 'lock' calls here.
Sorry, I thought we wanted nmi_enter/exit instead of the 
rcu_read_lock/unlock. I guess the rcu locks
will not cause the deadlock scenario you described in the previous 
patchset if we have the
nmi_enter/exit wrapped around the rcu critical section.
>> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, &ghes_sea, list) {
>> +		if (!ghes_proc(ghes))
>> +			ret = NOTIFY_OK;
>> +	}
>> +	nmi_exit();
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sea = {
>> +	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sea,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
>> +{
>> +	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
>> +	if (list_empty(&ghes_sea))
>> +		register_sea_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sea);
>> +	list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sea);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
>> +{
>> +	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
>> +	list_del_rcu(&ghes->list);
>> +	if (list_empty(&ghes_sea))
>> +		unregister_sea_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sea);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
> ghes_nmi_remove() has:
>> 	/*
>>   	* To synchronize with NMI handler, ghes can only be
>>   	* freed after NMI handler finishes.
>> 	*/
>> 	synchronize_rcu()
> This 'waits until a grace period has elapsed'. This is because ghes_remove()
> goes and kfree()s the ghes object while another CPU may be holding that entry in
> the list in ghes_notify_sea().
I will add synchronize_rcu() in the next patchset.
>> +}
>> +#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
>> +static inline int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
>> +{
>> +	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
>> +	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
>> +	return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
>> +{
>> +	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
>> +	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
>>   /*
>>    * printk is not safe in NMI context.  So in NMI handler, we allocate
>> @@ -1011,6 +1072,14 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
>>   	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL:
>>   	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI:
>>   		break;
>> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
>> +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
>> +			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via SEA is not supported\n",
>> +				generic->header.source_id);
>> +			rc = -ENOTSUPP;
>> +			goto err;
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>>   	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
>>   		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI)) {
>>   			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via NMI interrupt is not supported!\n",
>> @@ -1022,6 +1091,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
>>   		pr_warning(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via local interrupt is not supported!\n",
>>   			   generic->header.source_id);
>>   		goto err;
>
>> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO:
>> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
>> +	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV:
> These three weren't mentioned in the commit message. I guess they are drive-by
> cleanup?
SEI and GSIV were also added in the ACPI 6.1 spec (18.3.2.9 Hardware 
Error Notification) and GPIO was missing, so I added all three.

Thanks,
Tyler
>> +		pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via notification type %u is not supported\n",
>> +			generic->header.source_id, generic->header.source_id);
>> +		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
>> +		goto err;
>>   	default:
>>   		pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX "Unknown notification type: %u for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
>>   			   generic->notify.type, generic->header.source_id);
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-18 23:26     ` Baicar, Tyler
@ 2017-01-19 17:55       ` James Morse
  2017-01-20 20:35         ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-19 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baicar, Tyler
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 18/01/17 23:26, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 1/17/2017 3:31 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>>> Code.
>>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>>> new SEA handler is used.
>>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>> struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>       return 1;
>>>   }
>>>   +/*
>>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>>> + */
>>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct siginfo info;
>>> +
>>> +    atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>>> +
>>> +    pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>>> +         fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>>> +
>>> +    info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>>> +    info.si_errno = 0;
>>> +    info.si_code  = 0;
>> Half of the other do_*() functions in this file read the signo and code from the
>> fault_info table.
>>
>>
>>> +    info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>> addr here was read from FAR_EL1, but for some of the classes of exception you
>> have listed below this register isn't updated with the faulting address.
>>
>> The ARM-ARM version 'k' in D1.10.5 "Summary of registers on faults taken to an
>> Exception level that is using Aarch64" has:
>>> The architecture permits that the FAR_ELx is UNKNOWN for Synchronous External
>>> Aborts other than Synchronous External Aborts on Translation Table Walks. In
>>> this case, the ISS.FnV bit returned in ESR_ELx  indicates whether FAR_ELx is
>>> valid.
>> This is a problem if we get 'synchronous external abort' or 'synchronous parity
>> error' while a user space process was running.

> It looks like this would just cause an incorrect address to be printed in the
> above pr_err.
> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see arm64_notify_die or anything that gets
> called from
> there using the info.si_addr variable.

I may be misreading something here...

This patch has:
>	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);

>From arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:arm64_notify_die():
>	if (user_mode(regs)) {
>		current->thread.fault_address = 0;
>		current->thread.fault_code = err;
>		force_sig_info(info->si_signo, info, current);
>	}

So if the SEA interrupted userspace, we put maybe-unknown addr into
force_sig_info() to deliver a signal to user space. User-space then gets a copy
of the info struct containing the maybe-unknown addr.

I think this is an existing bug, but if we are separating the synchronous
external aborts from the generic do_bad handler, we should probably check the
FnV bit. (I think we should still print it out)


> What do you suggest I do here? The firmware should be reporting the physical and
> virtual
> address information if it is available in the HEST entry that the kernel will
> parse.

Its not just firmware that may trigger this, other SoCs may use it for parity or
ECC errors, and they may not always have a valid address in FAR_EL1.

I think we should check the FnV bit in the esr variable and set info.si_addr to
0 if the addr we have isn't valid:
'For some implementations, the value of si_addr may be inaccurate.' [0]


Thanks,

James


[0] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/signal.h.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-18 23:51     ` Baicar, Tyler
@ 2017-01-19 17:57       ` James Morse
  2017-01-20 20:58         ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-19 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baicar, Tyler
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 18/01/17 23:51, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 1/18/2017 7:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>> ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchrounous External
>>> Abort) notification type for ARMv8.
>>> Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
>>> source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
>>> into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
>>> SEA exceptions when they occur.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> index 2acbc60..87efe26 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> @@ -767,6 +772,62 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sci = {
>>>       .notifier_call = ghes_notify_sci,
>>>   };
>>>   +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>>> +static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
>>> +
>>> +static int ghes_notify_sea(struct notifier_block *this,
>>> +                  unsigned long event, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct ghes *ghes;
>>> +    int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>> +
>>> +    nmi_enter();

>> Can we move this into the arch code? Its because we got here from a
>> synchronous-exception that makes this nmi-like, I think it only makes sense for
>> it be called from under /arch/.

> So move the nmi_enter/exit calls into do_sea of the previous patch? I can do
> that in the next patchset.

>> Where did the rcu_read_lock() go? I can see its missing from ghes_notify_nmi()
>> too, but I don't know enough about RCU to know if that's safe!
>>
>> The second paragraph in the comment above rcu_read_lock() describes it as
>> preventing call_rcu() during a read-side critical section that was running
>> concurrently. Doesn't this mean we can race with ghes_sea_remove() on another
>> CPU because we wait for the wrong grace period?
>>
>> The same comment talks about how these read-side critical sections can nest, so
>> I think its quite safe to make these 'lock' calls here.

> Sorry, I thought we wanted nmi_enter/exit instead of the rcu_read_lock/unlock. I
> guess the rcu locks
> will not cause the deadlock scenario you described in the previous patchset if
> we have the
> nmi_enter/exit wrapped around the rcu critical section.

Ah, not instead of, (well, not initially!).
The nmi_enter()/nmi_exit() thing was to fix the APEI interrupting APEI problem.
This is only a problem for notification types which can interrupt
interrupts-masked code, of which SEA is one. (and x86's NMI is the other).

I think I've found the answer to why the rcu_read_lock() isn't needed.
synchronize_sched() has:
> * This means that all preempt_disable code sequences, including NMI and
> * non-threaded hardware-interrupt handlers, in progress on entry will
> * have completed before this primitive returns.

synchronize_rcu() has the same innards, so I'm convinced this its safe not to
have those calls in here. Could we have a comment along the lines of:
> synchronize_rcu() will wait for nmi_exit(), so no need to rcu_read_lock().

(The more I learn about RCU the scarier it becomes!)


There are two other things that need changing to make the in_nmi() code path
work on arm64.
Always reserve the virtual-address-space forcing GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES to be 2
regardless of CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI. This is almost revert of
594c7255dce7a13cac50cf2470cc56e2c3b0494e (but that did a few other things too).

We also need to fix ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() to use arch_apei_get_mem_attribute()
and not assume PAGE_KERNEL.


Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-19 17:55       ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-20 20:35         ` Baicar, Tyler
  2017-01-23 10:01           ` James Morse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-20 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On 1/19/2017 10:55 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 18/01/17 23:26, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> On 1/17/2017 3:31 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>>>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>>>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>>>> Code.
>>>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>>>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>>>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>>>> new SEA handler is used.
>>>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>>> struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>>        return 1;
>>>>    }
>>>>    +/*
>>>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>>>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct siginfo info;
>>>> +
>>>> +    atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> +    pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>>>> +         fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>>>> +
>>>> +    info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>>>> +    info.si_errno = 0;
>>>> +    info.si_code  = 0;
>>> Half of the other do_*() functions in this file read the signo and code from the
>>> fault_info table.
>>>
>>>
>>>> +    info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>>> addr here was read from FAR_EL1, but for some of the classes of exception you
>>> have listed below this register isn't updated with the faulting address.
>>>
>>> The ARM-ARM version 'k' in D1.10.5 "Summary of registers on faults taken to an
>>> Exception level that is using Aarch64" has:
>>>> The architecture permits that the FAR_ELx is UNKNOWN for Synchronous External
>>>> Aborts other than Synchronous External Aborts on Translation Table Walks. In
>>>> this case, the ISS.FnV bit returned in ESR_ELx  indicates whether FAR_ELx is
>>>> valid.
>>> This is a problem if we get 'synchronous external abort' or 'synchronous parity
>>> error' while a user space process was running.
>> It looks like this would just cause an incorrect address to be printed in the
>> above pr_err.
>> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see arm64_notify_die or anything that gets
>> called from
>> there using the info.si_addr variable.
> I may be misreading something here...
>
> This patch has:
>> 	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>> 	arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>  From arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:arm64_notify_die():
>> 	if (user_mode(regs)) {
>> 		current->thread.fault_address = 0;
>> 		current->thread.fault_code = err;
>> 		force_sig_info(info->si_signo, info, current);
>> 	}
> So if the SEA interrupted userspace, we put maybe-unknown addr into
> force_sig_info() to deliver a signal to user space. User-space then gets a copy
> of the info struct containing the maybe-unknown addr.
>
> I think this is an existing bug, but if we are separating the synchronous
> external aborts from the generic do_bad handler, we should probably check the
> FnV bit. (I think we should still print it out)
>
>
>> What do you suggest I do here? The firmware should be reporting the physical and
>> virtual
>> address information if it is available in the HEST entry that the kernel will
>> parse.
> Its not just firmware that may trigger this, other SoCs may use it for parity or
> ECC errors, and they may not always have a valid address in FAR_EL1.
>
> I think we should check the FnV bit in the esr variable and set info.si_addr to
> 0 if the addr we have isn't valid:
> 'For some implementations, the value of si_addr may be inaccurate.' [0]
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
> [0] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/signal.h.html
Hello James,

Okay, that makes sense, we don't want userspace to be notified with an 
incorrect address.
I will add the check to verify it's valid. Which bit in the ESR is the 
FnV bit? I'm not finding
the bit breakdown of the ISS that shows it.

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-19 17:57       ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-20 20:58         ` Baicar, Tyler
  2017-01-24 17:55           ` James Morse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-20 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On 1/19/2017 10:57 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 18/01/17 23:51, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> On 1/18/2017 7:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>> ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchrounous External
>>>> Abort) notification type for ARMv8.
>>>> Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
>>>> source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
>>>> into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
>>>> SEA exceptions when they occur.
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>>> index 2acbc60..87efe26 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>>> @@ -767,6 +772,62 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_sci = {
>>>>        .notifier_call = ghes_notify_sci,
>>>>    };
>>>>    +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>>>> +static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
>>>> +
>>>> +static int ghes_notify_sea(struct notifier_block *this,
>>>> +                  unsigned long event, void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct ghes *ghes;
>>>> +    int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>> +
>>>> +    nmi_enter();
>>> Can we move this into the arch code? Its because we got here from a
>>> synchronous-exception that makes this nmi-like, I think it only makes sense for
>>> it be called from under /arch/.
>> So move the nmi_enter/exit calls into do_sea of the previous patch? I can do
>> that in the next patchset.
>>> Where did the rcu_read_lock() go? I can see its missing from ghes_notify_nmi()
>>> too, but I don't know enough about RCU to know if that's safe!
>>>
>>> The second paragraph in the comment above rcu_read_lock() describes it as
>>> preventing call_rcu() during a read-side critical section that was running
>>> concurrently. Doesn't this mean we can race with ghes_sea_remove() on another
>>> CPU because we wait for the wrong grace period?
>>>
>>> The same comment talks about how these read-side critical sections can nest, so
>>> I think its quite safe to make these 'lock' calls here.
>> Sorry, I thought we wanted nmi_enter/exit instead of the rcu_read_lock/unlock. I
>> guess the rcu locks
>> will not cause the deadlock scenario you described in the previous patchset if
>> we have the
>> nmi_enter/exit wrapped around the rcu critical section.
> Ah, not instead of, (well, not initially!).
> The nmi_enter()/nmi_exit() thing was to fix the APEI interrupting APEI problem.
> This is only a problem for notification types which can interrupt
> interrupts-masked code, of which SEA is one. (and x86's NMI is the other).
>
> I think I've found the answer to why the rcu_read_lock() isn't needed.
> synchronize_sched() has:
>> * This means that all preempt_disable code sequences, including NMI and
>> * non-threaded hardware-interrupt handlers, in progress on entry will
>> * have completed before this primitive returns.
> synchronize_rcu() has the same innards, so I'm convinced this its safe not to
> have those calls in here. Could we have a comment along the lines of:
>> synchronize_rcu() will wait for nmi_exit(), so no need to rcu_read_lock().
Okay, I'll add the comment in the next patchset.
> (The more I learn about RCU the scarier it becomes!)
>
>
> There are two other things that need changing to make the in_nmi() code path
> work on arm64.
> Always reserve the virtual-address-space forcing GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES to be 2
> regardless of CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI. This is almost revert of
> 594c7255dce7a13cac50cf2470cc56e2c3b0494e (but that did a few other things too).
Looks simple enough, should I force it to 2 in all cases, or add a check 
for CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
similar to the check for CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI?
> We also need to fix ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() to use arch_apei_get_mem_attribute()
> and not assume PAGE_KERNEL.
So just change the call to ioremap_page_range to:

ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, 
arch_apei_get_mem_attribute());

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-20 20:35         ` Baicar, Tyler
@ 2017-01-23 10:01           ` James Morse
  2017-01-24 18:41             ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-23 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baicar, Tyler
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 20/01/17 20:35, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 1/19/2017 10:55 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 18/01/17 23:26, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2017 3:31 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>>> +    info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>>>> addr here was read from FAR_EL1, but for some of the classes of exception you
>>>> have listed below this register isn't updated with the faulting address.
>>>>
>>>> The ARM-ARM version 'k' in D1.10.5 "Summary of registers on faults taken to an
>>>> Exception level that is using Aarch64" has:
>>>>> The architecture permits that the FAR_ELx is UNKNOWN for Synchronous External
>>>>> Aborts other than Synchronous External Aborts on Translation Table Walks. In
>>>>> this case, the ISS.FnV bit returned in ESR_ELx  indicates whether FAR_ELx is
>>>>> valid.
>>>> This is a problem if we get 'synchronous external abort' or 'synchronous parity
>>>> error' while a user space process was running.
>>> It looks like this would just cause an incorrect address to be printed in the
>>> above pr_err.
>>> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see arm64_notify_die or anything that gets
>>> called from
>>> there using the info.si_addr variable.
>> I may be misreading something here...
>>
>> This patch has:
>>>     info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>>>     arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>>  From arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:arm64_notify_die():
>>>     if (user_mode(regs)) {
>>>         current->thread.fault_address = 0;
>>>         current->thread.fault_code = err;
>>>         force_sig_info(info->si_signo, info, current);
>>>     }
>> So if the SEA interrupted userspace, we put maybe-unknown addr into
>> force_sig_info() to deliver a signal to user space. User-space then gets a copy
>> of the info struct containing the maybe-unknown addr.
>>
>> I think this is an existing bug, but if we are separating the synchronous
>> external aborts from the generic do_bad handler, we should probably check the
>> FnV bit. (I think we should still print it out)
>>
>>
>>> What do you suggest I do here? The firmware should be reporting the physical and
>>> virtual
>>> address information if it is available in the HEST entry that the kernel will
>>> parse.
>> Its not just firmware that may trigger this, other SoCs may use it for parity or
>> ECC errors, and they may not always have a valid address in FAR_EL1.
>>
>> I think we should check the FnV bit in the esr variable and set info.si_addr to
>> 0 if the addr we have isn't valid:
>> 'For some implementations, the value of si_addr may be inaccurate.' [0]

> Okay, that makes sense, we don't want userspace to be notified with an incorrect
> address.
> I will add the check to verify it's valid. Which bit in the ESR is the FnV bit?
> I'm not finding
> the bit breakdown of the ISS that shows it.

The bits in ISS vary depending on the EC, so a little digging is required.
"D7.2.27 ESR_ELx, Exception Syndrome Register (ELx)" lists the EC values, from
there 'Instruction Abort' and 'Data Abort' both list FnV as bit 10. Version 'k'
of the ARM-ARM has this on pages D7-1953 to D7-1956.


Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-20 20:58         ` Baicar, Tyler
@ 2017-01-24 17:55           ` James Morse
  2017-01-24 18:43             ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2017-01-24 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baicar, Tyler
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

Hi Tyler,

On 20/01/17 20:58, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 1/19/2017 10:57 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 18/01/17 23:51, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>>> On 1/18/2017 7:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c

>> There are two other things that need changing to make the in_nmi() code path
>> work on arm64.
>> Always reserve the virtual-address-space forcing GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES to be 2
>> regardless of CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI. This is almost revert of
>> 594c7255dce7a13cac50cf2470cc56e2c3b0494e (but that did a few other things too).

> Looks simple enough, should I force it to 2 in all cases, or add a check for
> CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> similar to the check for CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI?

Its just address space not actual memory it is reserving right? I think just
reserve two pages all the time to save eye-sore #ifdefs!


>> We also need to fix ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() to use arch_apei_get_mem_attribute()
>> and not assume PAGE_KERNEL.

> So just change the call to ioremap_page_range to:
> 
> ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> arch_apei_get_mem_attribute());

(you need to give arch_apei_get_mem_attribute() the address...) copying whatever
ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq() does a few lines down is probably best.


Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort
  2017-01-23 10:01           ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-24 18:41             ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-24 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On 1/23/2017 3:01 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 20/01/17 20:35, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> On 1/19/2017 10:55 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>> On 18/01/17 23:26, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>>>> On 1/17/2017 3:31 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>>>> +    info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>>>>> addr here was read from FAR_EL1, but for some of the classes of exception you
>>>>> have listed below this register isn't updated with the faulting address.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ARM-ARM version 'k' in D1.10.5 "Summary of registers on faults taken to an
>>>>> Exception level that is using Aarch64" has:
>>>>>> The architecture permits that the FAR_ELx is UNKNOWN for Synchronous External
>>>>>> Aborts other than Synchronous External Aborts on Translation Table Walks. In
>>>>>> this case, the ISS.FnV bit returned in ESR_ELx  indicates whether FAR_ELx is
>>>>>> valid.
>>>>> This is a problem if we get 'synchronous external abort' or 'synchronous parity
>>>>> error' while a user space process was running.
>>>> It looks like this would just cause an incorrect address to be printed in the
>>>> above pr_err.
>>>> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see arm64_notify_die or anything that gets
>>>> called from
>>>> there using the info.si_addr variable.
>>> I may be misreading something here...
>>>
>>> This patch has:
>>>>      info.si_addr  = (void __user *)addr;
>>>>      arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>>>   From arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:arm64_notify_die():
>>>>      if (user_mode(regs)) {
>>>>          current->thread.fault_address = 0;
>>>>          current->thread.fault_code = err;
>>>>          force_sig_info(info->si_signo, info, current);
>>>>      }
>>> So if the SEA interrupted userspace, we put maybe-unknown addr into
>>> force_sig_info() to deliver a signal to user space. User-space then gets a copy
>>> of the info struct containing the maybe-unknown addr.
>>>
>>> I think this is an existing bug, but if we are separating the synchronous
>>> external aborts from the generic do_bad handler, we should probably check the
>>> FnV bit. (I think we should still print it out)
>>>
>>>
>>>> What do you suggest I do here? The firmware should be reporting the physical and
>>>> virtual
>>>> address information if it is available in the HEST entry that the kernel will
>>>> parse.
>>> Its not just firmware that may trigger this, other SoCs may use it for parity or
>>> ECC errors, and they may not always have a valid address in FAR_EL1.
>>>
>>> I think we should check the FnV bit in the esr variable and set info.si_addr to
>>> 0 if the addr we have isn't valid:
>>> 'For some implementations, the value of si_addr may be inaccurate.' [0]
>> Okay, that makes sense, we don't want userspace to be notified with an incorrect
>> address.
>> I will add the check to verify it's valid. Which bit in the ESR is the FnV bit?
>> I'm not finding
>> the bit breakdown of the ISS that shows it.
> The bits in ISS vary depending on the EC, so a little digging is required.
> "D7.2.27 ESR_ELx, Exception Syndrome Register (ELx)" lists the EC values, from
> there 'Instruction Abort' and 'Data Abort' both list FnV as bit 10. Version 'k'
> of the ARM-ARM has this on pages D7-1953 to D7-1956.
Got it! I'll add the check for this in my next patchset.

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8
  2017-01-24 17:55           ` James Morse
@ 2017-01-24 18:43             ` Baicar, Tyler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Baicar, Tyler @ 2017-01-24 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morse
  Cc: christoffer.dall, marc.zyngier, pbonzini, rkrcmar, linux,
	catalin.marinas, will.deacon, rjw, lenb, matt, robert.moore,
	lv.zheng, nkaje, zjzhang, mark.rutland, akpm, eun.taik.lee,
	sandeepa.s.prabhu, labbott, shijie.huang, rruigrok,
	paul.gortmaker, tn, fu.wei, rostedt, bristot, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvmarm, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, devel,
	Suzuki.Poulose, punit.agrawal, astone, harba, hanjun.guo,
	john.garry, shiju.jose

On 1/24/2017 10:55 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On 20/01/17 20:58, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> On 1/19/2017 10:57 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>> On 18/01/17 23:51, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>>>> On 1/18/2017 7:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> There are two other things that need changing to make the in_nmi() code path
>>> work on arm64.
>>> Always reserve the virtual-address-space forcing GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES to be 2
>>> regardless of CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI. This is almost revert of
>>> 594c7255dce7a13cac50cf2470cc56e2c3b0494e (but that did a few other things too).
>> Looks simple enough, should I force it to 2 in all cases, or add a check for
>> CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>> similar to the check for CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI?
> Its just address space not actual memory it is reserving right? I think just
> reserve two pages all the time to save eye-sore #ifdefs!
>
Okay, will do!
>>> We also need to fix ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() to use arch_apei_get_mem_attribute()
>>> and not assume PAGE_KERNEL.
>> So just change the call to ioremap_page_range to:
>>
>> ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
>> arch_apei_get_mem_attribute());
> (you need to give arch_apei_get_mem_attribute() the address...) copying whatever
> ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq() does a few lines down is probably best.
Sounds good, I'll make the changes in my next patchset.

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-24 18:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-12 18:15 [PATCH V7 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 01/10] acpi: apei: read ack upon ghes record consumption Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 03/10] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar
2017-01-16 11:53   ` Will Deacon
2017-01-16 20:09     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-17 10:27       ` Will Deacon
2017-01-18 22:53         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-17 10:23     ` James Morse
2017-01-18 22:52       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-17 10:31   ` James Morse
2017-01-18 23:26     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-19 17:55       ` James Morse
2017-01-20 20:35         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-23 10:01           ` James Morse
2017-01-24 18:41             ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8 Tyler Baicar
2017-01-18 14:50   ` James Morse
2017-01-18 23:51     ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-19 17:57       ` James Morse
2017-01-20 20:58         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-24 17:55           ` James Morse
2017-01-24 18:43             ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 06/10] acpi: apei: panic OS with fatal error status block Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 07/10] efi: print unrecognized CPER section Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 08/10] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for " Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 09/10] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar
2017-01-12 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support Tyler Baicar
2017-01-16 11:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-16 20:14     ` Baicar, Tyler

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).