* Re: x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
[not found] <git-mailbomb-linux-master-5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062@kernel.org>
@ 2018-10-29 12:58 ` Marc Dionne
2018-10-29 14:24 ` Juergen Gross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Dionne @ 2018-10-29 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgross; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:37 PM Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Commit: 5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
> Parent: 27876f3882fdd4acb3d3614a0133ecdc777fc292
> Refname: refs/heads/master
> Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
> Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue Aug 28 09:40:19 2018 +0200
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CommitDate: Mon Sep 3 16:50:35 2018 +0200
>
> x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
>
> Instead of using six globally visible paravirt ops structures combine
> them in a single structure, keeping the original structures as
> sub-structures.
>
> This avoids the need to assemble struct paravirt_patch_template at
> runtime on the stack each time apply_paravirt() is being called (i.e.
> when loading a module).
The above commit replaces pv_lock_ops, which was EXPORT_SYMBOL, with
something that is part of pv_ops, which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. When
CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is set, this has the side effect of making
spin_lock() unusable by out of tree modules, which will likely be an
issue for many, if not most of them.
Marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
2018-10-29 12:58 ` x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure Marc Dionne
@ 2018-10-29 14:24 ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-30 13:33 ` Marc Dionne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2018-10-29 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Dionne; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Thomas Gleixner
On 29/10/2018 13:58, Marc Dionne wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:37 PM Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Commit: 5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
>> Parent: 27876f3882fdd4acb3d3614a0133ecdc777fc292
>> Refname: refs/heads/master
>> Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
>> Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> AuthorDate: Tue Aug 28 09:40:19 2018 +0200
>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> CommitDate: Mon Sep 3 16:50:35 2018 +0200
>>
>> x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
>>
>> Instead of using six globally visible paravirt ops structures combine
>> them in a single structure, keeping the original structures as
>> sub-structures.
>>
>> This avoids the need to assemble struct paravirt_patch_template at
>> runtime on the stack each time apply_paravirt() is being called (i.e.
>> when loading a module).
>
> The above commit replaces pv_lock_ops, which was EXPORT_SYMBOL, with
> something that is part of pv_ops, which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. When
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is set, this has the side effect of making
> spin_lock() unusable by out of tree modules, which will likely be an
> issue for many, if not most of them.
Thanks for noticing!
Sending a patch soon...
Juergen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
2018-10-29 14:24 ` Juergen Gross
@ 2018-10-30 13:33 ` Marc Dionne
2018-10-30 13:50 ` Juergen Gross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Dionne @ 2018-10-30 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgross; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:25 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2018 13:58, Marc Dionne wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:37 PM Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Commit: 5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
> >> Parent: 27876f3882fdd4acb3d3614a0133ecdc777fc292
> >> Refname: refs/heads/master
> >> Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
> >> Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> >> AuthorDate: Tue Aug 28 09:40:19 2018 +0200
> >> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> CommitDate: Mon Sep 3 16:50:35 2018 +0200
> >>
> >> x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
> >>
> >> Instead of using six globally visible paravirt ops structures combine
> >> them in a single structure, keeping the original structures as
> >> sub-structures.
> >>
> >> This avoids the need to assemble struct paravirt_patch_template at
> >> runtime on the stack each time apply_paravirt() is being called (i.e.
> >> when loading a module).
> >
> > The above commit replaces pv_lock_ops, which was EXPORT_SYMBOL, with
> > something that is part of pv_ops, which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. When
> > CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is set, this has the side effect of making
> > spin_lock() unusable by out of tree modules, which will likely be an
> > issue for many, if not most of them.
>
> Thanks for noticing!
>
> Sending a patch soon...
>
>
> Juergen
Thanks for the quick patch. Does this also need fixing for arm/arm64?
I can't easily verify but it seems like it would have the same issue.
Marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
2018-10-30 13:33 ` Marc Dionne
@ 2018-10-30 13:50 ` Juergen Gross
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2018-10-30 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Dionne; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Thomas Gleixner
On 30/10/2018 14:33, Marc Dionne wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:25 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/10/2018 13:58, Marc Dionne wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:37 PM Linux Kernel Mailing List
>>> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Commit: 5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
>>>> Parent: 27876f3882fdd4acb3d3614a0133ecdc777fc292
>>>> Refname: refs/heads/master
>>>> Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
>>>> Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>>> AuthorDate: Tue Aug 28 09:40:19 2018 +0200
>>>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>> CommitDate: Mon Sep 3 16:50:35 2018 +0200
>>>>
>>>> x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
>>>>
>>>> Instead of using six globally visible paravirt ops structures combine
>>>> them in a single structure, keeping the original structures as
>>>> sub-structures.
>>>>
>>>> This avoids the need to assemble struct paravirt_patch_template at
>>>> runtime on the stack each time apply_paravirt() is being called (i.e.
>>>> when loading a module).
>>>
>>> The above commit replaces pv_lock_ops, which was EXPORT_SYMBOL, with
>>> something that is part of pv_ops, which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. When
>>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is set, this has the side effect of making
>>> spin_lock() unusable by out of tree modules, which will likely be an
>>> issue for many, if not most of them.
>>
>> Thanks for noticing!
>>
>> Sending a patch soon...
>>
>>
>> Juergen
>
> Thanks for the quick patch. Does this also need fixing for arm/arm64?
> I can't easily verify but it seems like it would have the same issue.
pv_lock_ops was x86 only.
Juergen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-30 13:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <git-mailbomb-linux-master-5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062@kernel.org>
2018-10-29 12:58 ` x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure Marc Dionne
2018-10-29 14:24 ` Juergen Gross
2018-10-30 13:33 ` Marc Dionne
2018-10-30 13:50 ` Juergen Gross
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).