linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH GHAK16 V5 06/10] capabilities: move audit log decision to function
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:57:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d2c4b37a1c7e6d9c58aff48037a0058cd2eff01.1507769413.git.rgb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1507769413.git.rgb@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1507769413.git.rgb@redhat.com>

Move the audit log decision logic to its own function to isolate the
complexity in one place.

Suggested-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Acked-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Okay-ished-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
 security/commoncap.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 421f743..d7f0cbd 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -765,6 +765,32 @@ static inline bool __is_setuid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old)
 static inline bool __is_setgid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old)
 { return !gid_eq(new->egid, old->gid); }
 
+/*
+ * Audit candidate if current->cap_effective is set
+ *
+ * We do not bother to audit if 3 things are true:
+ *   1) cap_effective has all caps
+ *   2) we are root
+ *   3) root is supposed to have all caps (SECURE_NOROOT)
+ * Since this is just a normal root execing a process.
+ *
+ * Number 1 above might fail if you don't have a full bset, but I think
+ * that is interesting information to audit.
+ */
+static inline bool nonroot_raised_pE(struct cred *cred, kuid_t root)
+{
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	if (__cap_grew(effective, ambient, cred)) {
+		if (!__cap_full(effective, cred) ||
+		    !__is_eff(root, cred) || !__is_real(root, cred) ||
+		    !root_privileged()) {
+			ret = true;
+		}
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * cap_bprm_set_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
  * @bprm: The execution parameters, including the proposed creds
@@ -841,26 +867,10 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	if (WARN_ON(!cap_ambient_invariant_ok(new)))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	/*
-	 * Audit candidate if current->cap_effective is set
-	 *
-	 * We do not bother to audit if 3 things are true:
-	 *   1) cap_effective has all caps
-	 *   2) we are root
-	 *   3) root is supposed to have all caps (SECURE_NOROOT)
-	 * Since this is just a normal root execing a process.
-	 *
-	 * Number 1 above might fail if you don't have a full bset, but I think
-	 * that is interesting information to audit.
-	 */
-	if (__cap_grew(effective, ambient, new)) {
-		if (!__cap_full(effective, new) ||
-		    !__is_eff(root_uid, new) || !__is_real(root_uid, new) ||
-		    !root_privileged()) {
-			ret = audit_log_bprm_fcaps(bprm, new, old);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
-		}
+	if (nonroot_raised_pE(new, root_uid)) {
+		ret = audit_log_bprm_fcaps(bprm, new, old);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	new->securebits &= ~issecure_mask(SECURE_KEEP_CAPS);
-- 
1.8.3.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12  0:57 [PATCH GHAK16 V5 00/10] capabilities: do not audit log BPRM_FCAPS on set*id Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 01/10] capabilities: factor out cap_bprm_set_creds privileged root Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 02/10] capabilities: intuitive names for cap gain status Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 03/10] capabilities: rename has_cap to has_fcap Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 04/10] capabilities: use root_priveleged inline to clarify logic Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 05/10] capabilities: use intuitive names for id changes Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 07/10] capabilities: remove a layer of conditional logic Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 08/10] capabilities: invert logic for clarity Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 09/10] capabilities: fix logic for effective root or real root Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12  0:57 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 10/10] capabilities: audit log other surprising conditions Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-19 13:08 ` [PATCH GHAK16 V5 00/10] capabilities: do not audit log BPRM_FCAPS on set*id Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-20  1:29   ` James Morris
2017-10-20  2:34     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-20  5:15   ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9d2c4b37a1c7e6d9c58aff48037a0058cd2eff01.1507769413.git.rgb@redhat.com \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).