From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
"Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:08:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f28529005867512105182f8fa2b0f7b0d14b30d.camel@svanheule.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwFToOOFKsr/mL7X@yury-laptop>
Hi Yury,
On Sat, 2022-08-20 at 14:35 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > When the number of CPUs that can possibly be brought online is known at
> > boot time, e.g. when HOTPLUG is disabled, nr_cpu_ids may be smaller than
> > NR_CPUS. In that case, cpu_possible_mask would not be completely filled,
> > and cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask) can return false for valid system
> > configurations.
>
> It doesn't mean we can just give up. You can check validity of possible
> cpumask like this:
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_first_zero(&mask_all))
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, NR_CPUS, cpumask_first(&mask_all))
Did you mean cpu_possible_mask, or mask_all?
For cpu_possible_mask, these tests are in test_cpumask_first(), albeit under a
slightly different form. Together with the tests in test_cpumask_weight() and
test_cpumask_last(), cpu_possible_mask is already one of the more constrained
masks.
For mask_all, the mask is filled up with nr_cpumask_bits <= NR_CPUS. I could add
cpumask_first(), cpumask_first_zero(), and cpumask_last() tests though.
More tests could be also added for cpu_all_mask, since this does have all
NR_CPUS bits set, but I think that belongs in a separate patch.
I think the extra mask_all and cpu_all_mask test are out of scope for this
patch, but they could be added in another patch (for 6.1).
Best,
Sander
>
> > Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite")
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@riseup.net/
> > Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
> > Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
> > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > Rewrite commit message to explain why this test is wrong
> >
> > lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
> > index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
> > @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all;
> > static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
> >
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
> > --
> > 2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-21 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-20 15:03 [PATCH v2 0/5] cpumask: KUnit test suite fixes and improvements Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 21:35 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-21 13:08 ` Sander Vanheule [this message]
[not found] ` <CAAH8bW9yZUMn2shYAB1LaDyzgFMYtWCRUXxq=bMCiFys=gzKig@mail.gmail.com>
2022-08-21 13:27 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] lib/test_cpumask: fix cpu_possible_mask last test Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] lib/test_cpumask: follow KUnit style guidelines Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] lib/cpumask_kunit: log mask contents Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 21:46 ` Yury Norov
2022-08-21 13:13 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-08-21 14:02 ` Maíra Canal
2022-08-21 16:39 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] lib/cpumask_kunit: add tests file to MAINTAINERS Sander Vanheule
2022-08-20 22:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] cpumask: KUnit test suite fixes and improvements Yury Norov
2022-08-21 13:25 ` Sander Vanheule
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f28529005867512105182f8fa2b0f7b0d14b30d.camel@svanheule.net \
--to=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).