linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
@ 2011-11-28 18:53 wilsonjonathan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: wilsonjonathan @ 2011-11-28 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Quick question regarding linear raid.

If a disk fails on a linear raid I understand how the raid is
non-recoverable, as a whole, as it has lost a chunk of data.

However is it possible to recover the data from the non-failed portion
of the raid as I assume linear works by starting at one end of the array
and slowly progresses to the other?

Or perhaps it is dependent on the file system on the array, eg. ext
works by trying to place files distant to each other to help reduce the
possibility of fragmentation?

Perhaps the filesystem meta data, or some portion, may span between two
physical drives which would corrupt its table?

And obviously if a file spans two disks it would be missing part of its
data?

Does the raid underlying a file system do its own things, re-space,
physical data layout, etc; or does/can a file system impact on the
workings of an array?

The more I look into software raid the more fasinated I become with it
and its inner workings. While its way beyond me in some of the maths and
the fact I am un-proficient in C it has really caught my intrigue, and
all because I wanted to set up a small home server ;-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
       [not found] <1322506426.2259.33.camel@AOC>
@ 2011-11-28 20:05 ` wilsonjonathan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: wilsonjonathan @ 2011-11-28 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Please ignore as sent to wrong list.

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 18:53 +0000, wilsonjonathan wrote:
> Quick question regarding linear raid.
> 
> If a disk fails on a linear raid I understand how the raid is
> non-recoverable, as a whole, as it has lost a chunk of data.
> 
> However is it possible to recover the data from the non-failed portion
> of the raid as I assume linear works by starting at one end of the array
> and slowly progresses to the other?
> 
> Or perhaps it is dependent on the file system on the array, eg. ext
> works by trying to place files distant to each other to help reduce the
> possibility of fragmentation?
> 
> Perhaps the filesystem meta data, or some portion, may span between two
> physical drives which would corrupt its table?
> 
> And obviously if a file spans two disks it would be missing part of its
> data?
> 
> Does the raid underlying a file system do its own things, re-space,
> physical data layout, etc; or does/can a file system impact on the
> workings of an array?
> 
> The more I look into software raid the more fasinated I become with it
> and its inner workings. While its way beyond me in some of the maths and
> the fact I am un-proficient in C it has really caught my intrigue, and
> all because I wanted to set up a small home server ;-)
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-28 20:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-28 18:53 linear raid, is partial recovery possible? wilsonjonathan
     [not found] <1322506426.2259.33.camel@AOC>
2011-11-28 20:05 ` wilsonjonathan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).