From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: finer-grained lockdep/cross-release completion
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:42:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwD+0hhehWHmh8PW9eDCVtEBTi9KCmCrJXZRUFj77r82Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171218071159.GW26573@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> This didn't seem to have made it into -rc4. Anything needed to get it
> going?
Do you actually see the problem in -rc4?
Because we ended up removing the cross-release checking due to other
developers complaining. It seemed to need a lot more work before it
was ready.
So I suspect the patch is simply not relevant any more (even if it's
not necessarily wrong either).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 10:08 [PATCH] kthread: finer-grained lockdep/cross-release completion Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 14:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 19:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-12-08 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 16:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-08 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-11 9:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-18 7:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-18 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2017-12-19 9:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-20 1:14 ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-15 10:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-03-15 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-15 23:26 ` Byungchul Park
2018-10-18 8:56 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+55aFwD+0hhehWHmh8PW9eDCVtEBTi9KCmCrJXZRUFj77r82Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marta.lofstedt@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).