From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI: Make sriov work with hotplug remove
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:38:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxBKbXSNmfs8y6SrzA8w3kVRRni9R6VjxSJ-5VsRyhX0g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQW5VZZrdQmuKF6_4dvTDUO9xPL=uqo0KaohnJ4xboDwSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> for_each_prev_safe is working...
>
> please check attached patch...
Ugh. This is probably the best one so far, but the whole thing is
really confused.
Why does "stop_bus_device" do a "remove" for VF's at _all_? Why is
everything about those stupid virtual devices so screwed up? Why do we
have separate "stop" and "remove" methods, and then the "stop" does a
remove? WTF?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-21 9:52 [PATCH 0/7] PCI: pcie hotplug related patch Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI: Make sriov work with hotplug remove Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-23 18:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-23 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-23 19:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 20:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-24 4:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-01-23 19:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-23 21:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 22:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI: Separate pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id from pci_scan_device Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] pciehp: Checking pci conf reading to new added device instead of sleep 1s Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] pciehp: print out link status when dlla get active Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] pciehp: Add pcie_wait_link_not_active() Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] pciehp: Add Disable/enable link functions Yinghai Lu
2012-01-23 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-24 5:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] pciehp: Disable/enable link during slot power off/on Yinghai Lu
2012-01-21 10:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] PCI: pcie hotplug related patch Yinghai Lu
2012-01-27 18:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2012-01-27 18:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-01-30 3:42 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2012-01-27 18:55 [PATCH -v2 " Yinghai Lu
2012-01-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI: Make sriov work with hotplug remove Yinghai Lu
2012-01-27 19:43 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+55aFxBKbXSNmfs8y6SrzA8w3kVRRni9R6VjxSJ-5VsRyhX0g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).