linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] Removal of CONFIG_HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX
@ 2018-05-05 10:16 Masahiro Yamada
  2018-05-05 15:50 ` Linus Torvalds
  2018-05-05 15:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2018-05-05 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arch
  Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Steven Miao, James Hogan, Andrew Morton, Greg Kroah-Hartman

Hi.


CONFIG_HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX was selected
by BLACKFIN and METAG.

Now that both architectures removed in the previous
merge window, there is no more user of this CONFIG option.


My question is,
is it OK to remove CONFIG_HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX entirely?


In other words,
  - Is there possibility to revive Blackfin/Metag support?
  - Do future architectures need HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX?

I guess (hope) they are unlikely to happen.



If we can remove CONFIG_HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX,
several tools (modpost, genksyms, adjust_autoksyms.sh, etc.)
will be simplified.

Also, VMLINUX_SYMBOL() in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
can be removed.  So, the linker script will become more readable.


Is it OK to move forward the clean-ups?
Comments are appreciated.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-05 15:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-05 10:16 [RFC] Removal of CONFIG_HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX Masahiro Yamada
2018-05-05 15:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-05 15:55 ` Sam Ravnborg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).