[PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.1.10-rc1

Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
    net: mctp: purge receive queues on sk destruction

Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
    rust: print: avoid evaluating arguments in `pr_*` macros in `unsafe` blocks

Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
    net: fix NULL pointer in skb_segment_list

Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
    gpiolib-acpi: Don't set GPIOs for wakeup in S3 mode

Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
    gpiolib: acpi: Add a ignore wakeup quirk for Clevo NL5xRU

Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
    nvme-apple: only reset the controller when RTKit is running

Paulo Alcantara <pc@cjr.nz>
    cifs: fix return of uninitialized rc in dfs_cache_update_tgthint()

Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
    gpiolib: acpi: Allow ignoring wake capability on pins that aren't in _AEI

Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
    dmaengine: imx-sdma: Fix a possible memory leak in sdma_transfer_init

Roderick Colenbrander <roderick@gaikai.com>
    HID: playstation: sanity check DualSense calibration data.

José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
    HID: uclogic: Add support for XP-PEN Deco 01 V2

Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
    s390: workaround invalid gcc-11 out of bounds read warning

Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
    block: fix hctx checks for batch allocation

Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
    ACPI: video: Add backlight=native DMI quirk for Acer Aspire 4810T

Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
    LoongArch: Get frame info in unwind_start() when regs is not available

Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
    blk-cgroup: fix missing pd_online_fn() while activating policy

Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
    erofs: clean up parsing of fscache related options

Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
    kselftest: Fix error message for unconfigured LLVM builds

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    ARM: omap1: fix building gpio15xx

Dominik Kobinski <dominikkobinski314@gmail.com>
    arm64: dts: msm8994-angler: fix the memory map

Sriram R <quic_srirrama@quicinc.com>
    mac80211: Fix MLO address translation for multiple bss case

Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
    erofs/zmap.c: Fix incorrect offset calculation

Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
    bpf: Skip task with pid=1 in send_signal_common()

Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
    firmware: arm_scmi: Clear stale xfer->hdr.status

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
    arm64: dts: imx8mq-thor96: fix no-mmc property for SDHCI

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
    arm64: dts: freescale: Fix pca954x i2c-mux node names

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
    ARM: dts: vf610: Fix pca9548 i2c-mux node names

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
    ARM: dts: imx: Fix pca9547 i2c-mux node name


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |  4 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts                    |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts          |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-c.dts          |  2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c                     |  1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts  |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1043a-qds.dts  |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a-qds.dts  |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-qds.dts  |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-rdb.dts  |  2 +-
 .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-ten64.dts |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa-qds.dtsi |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa-rdb.dtsi |  2 +-
 .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-cex7.dtsi |  2 +-
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-nitrogen-r2.dts      |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-nitrogen.dts  |  4 +--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-thor96.dts    |  4 +--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek.dts      |  2 +-
 .../dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts     | 19 +++++++++++--
 arch/loongarch/kernel/process.c                    | 12 ++------
 arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_guess.c               |  6 ++++
 arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c            | 16 +++++++++--
 arch/s390/kernel/setup.c                           |  5 ++--
 block/blk-cgroup.c                                 |  4 +++
 block/blk-mq.c                                     |  6 +++-
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c                        |  8 ++++++
 drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c                             |  4 ++-
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c                 |  2 ++
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c                        | 20 ++++++++++++--
 drivers/hid/hid-ids.h                              |  1 +
 drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c                      | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c                     |  2 ++
 drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-params.c                   |  2 ++
 drivers/nvme/host/apple.c                          |  6 ++--
 fs/cifs/dfs_cache.c                                |  6 ++--
 fs/erofs/super.c                                   | 13 ++++-----
 fs/erofs/zmap.c                                    | 10 +++++--
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c                           |  3 ++
 net/core/skbuff.c                                  |  5 ++--
 net/mac80211/rx.c                                  |  3 ++
 net/mctp/af_mctp.c                                 |  6 ++++
 rust/kernel/print.rs                               | 29 ++++++++++++--------
 tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk                     |  2 +-
 43 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[ogasawara takeshi]

Hi Greg

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 7:26 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

6.1.10-rc1 tested.

x86_64

Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen1(Intel i5-1130G7, arch linux)

Thanks

Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Justin Forbes]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:12:48AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.

Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 2/3/23 02:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 2/3/23 2:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 2/3/23 03:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:12:48AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 503 pass: 503 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:12:48AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 15:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

NOTE:

clang-nightly-allmodconfig - Failed

Build error:
-----------
  include/linux/fortify-string.h:430:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field'
   declared with 'warning' attribute: detected write beyond size of field
   (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror,-Wattribute-warning]

This is already reported upstream,
https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/63d0c141.050a0220.c848b.4e93@mx.google.com/

Test results comparison:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.9-29-g52d447db92f6/testrun/14545824/suite/build/test/clang-nightly-allmodconfig/history/

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.10-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 52d447db92f6b22e04e7b12c736bf1700de4bbf7
* git describe: v6.1.9-29-g52d447db92f6
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.9-29-g52d447db92f6

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.8-307-gabbe4e7b6342)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.8-307-gabbe4e7b6342)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.8-307-gabbe4e7b6342)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.8-307-gabbe4e7b6342)

## Test result summary
total: 163841, pass: 145266, fail: 4409, skip: 14140, xfail: 26

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 147 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 51 total, 49 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 39 total, 36 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 32 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 44 total, 43 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-s
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* ltpa-6124632/0/tests/1_ltp-dio
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:12:48AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

6.1.10-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Nathan Chancellor]

Hi Naresh,

On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:55:10PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 15:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> > There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> 
> NOTE:
> 
> clang-nightly-allmodconfig - Failed
> 
> Build error:
> -----------
>   include/linux/fortify-string.h:430:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field'
>    declared with 'warning' attribute: detected write beyond size of field
>    (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror,-Wattribute-warning]
> 
> This is already reported upstream,
> https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/63d0c141.050a0220.c848b.4e93@mx.google.com/

I think you copied the wrong warning, as the one upstream is a write
warning, whereas the one I see in your build logs is a read error:

In file included from /builds/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:9:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/completion.h:12:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/swait.h:7:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:56:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:78:
In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60:
In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53:
In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5:
In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:22:
In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11:
In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:253:
/builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:543:4: error: call to '__read_overflow' declared with 'error' attribute: detected read beyond size of object (1st parameter)
                        __read_overflow();
                        ^

Regardless, this is still a clang bug that we are actively investigating, so it
can still be safely ignored by the kernel folks.

https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1687

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Fri, 03 Feb 2023 11:12:48 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.1:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    130 tests:	130 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.1.10-rc1-gd3d679472f3c
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 01:21, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:55:10PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 15:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.10 release.
> > > There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:09:58 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> >
> > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > NOTE:
> >
> > clang-nightly-allmodconfig - Failed
> >
> > Build error:
> > -----------
> >   include/linux/fortify-string.h:430:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field'
> >    declared with 'warning' attribute: detected write beyond size of field
> >    (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror,-Wattribute-warning]
> >
> > This is already reported upstream,
> > https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/63d0c141.050a0220.c848b.4e93@mx.google.com/
>
> I think you copied the wrong warning, as the one upstream is a write
> warning, whereas the one I see in your build logs is a read error:

You are right !
Thanks for checking build logs.

>
> In file included from /builds/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:9:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/completion.h:12:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/swait.h:7:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:56:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:78:
> In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60:
> In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53:
> In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5:
> In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:22:
> In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11:
> In file included from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
> In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:253:
> /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:543:4: error: call to '__read_overflow' declared with 'error' attribute: detected read beyond size of object (1st parameter)
>                         __read_overflow();
>                         ^
>
> Regardless, this is still a clang bug that we are actively investigating, so it
> can still be safely ignored by the kernel folks.
>
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1687

Thank you.

> Cheers,
> Nathan

- Naresh

Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/28] 6.1.10-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

Hi Greg

6.1.10-rc1

compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 37)

Thanks

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>