* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-05-17 4:12 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-17 5:56 ` Fox Chen
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-05-17 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade,
Shuah Khan
On 5/16/22 3:38 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 21:35:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.117-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-17 4:12 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-05-17 5:56 ` Fox Chen
2022-05-17 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fox Chen @ 2022-05-17 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, slade, Fox Chen
On Mon, 16 May 2022 23:38:20 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 21:35:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.117-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.10.117-rc2 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-17 4:12 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-17 5:56 ` Fox Chen
@ 2022-05-17 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-05-17 13:05 ` Samuel Zou
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2022-05-17 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, slade
Hi Greg,
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:38:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 21:35:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220408): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1170
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1165
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-17 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2022-05-17 13:05 ` Samuel Zou
2022-05-17 13:35 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Zou @ 2022-05-17 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 2022/5/17 5:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 21:35:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.117-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.117-rc2,
Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.117-rc2
Commit: 17429b76ed5416aac3996975e8e49e0b1f79ed27
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9033
passed: 9033
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9033
passed: 9033
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-17 13:05 ` Samuel Zou
@ 2022-05-17 13:35 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-05-17 19:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-17 21:01 ` Pavel Machek
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-05-17 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 03:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 21:35:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.117-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.117-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 17429b76ed5416aac3996975e8e49e0b1f79ed27
* git describe: v5.10.116-69-g17429b76ed54
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.116-69-g17429b76ed54
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.116-65-g11c5de3d33a9)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.116-65-g11c5de3d33a9)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.116-65-g11c5de3d33a9)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.116-65-g11c5de3d33a9)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 93799, pass: 79054, fail: 849, skip: 12960, xfail: 936
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 291 total, 291 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-17 13:35 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-05-17 19:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-17 21:01 ` Pavel Machek
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-05-17 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:38:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 21:35:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review
2022-05-16 21:38 [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.117-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-17 19:31 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-05-17 21:01 ` Pavel Machek
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2022-05-17 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.117 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread