(no subject)

[Prabhakar Lad]

Hi Mark,

I see a issue with one of the davinci boards, where regulator_get() fails
from this patch "regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full
constraints".
as I see regulator_get() supports dummy regulators by default.

So currently I am booting it traditional way (NON DT way) and
regulator_dev_lookup()
fails (return NULL)  and for this check it fails.

+    if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
         regulator = ERR_PTR(ret);
         goto out;
     }
In the NON-DT case the 'ret' is never updated in regulator_dev_lookup().

I tried adding regulator_has_full_constraints(); call in .init_machine
but results
the same. Any pointer would be helpfull.

Thanks,
--Prabhakar Lad

Re: your mail

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:36:05PM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Hi Mark,

Please use a subject line for your e-mails, otherwise they look a lot
like spam.

> So currently I am booting it traditional way (NON DT way) and
> regulator_dev_lookup()
> fails (return NULL)  and for this check it fails.

> +    if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
>          regulator = ERR_PTR(ret);
>          goto out;
>      }
> In the NON-DT case the 'ret' is never updated in regulator_dev_lookup().

What is the problem you're trying to report here?  You're describing the
behaviour of the code but I don't understand the problem.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]