From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:43:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8tHfyqJx9YBFX3hJBEKuCbDpminz_4uSLK=MHV7W8-hJg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVncBnD25RLLqL2qDFwboPSVvo5faJvamDxPH_wq9r22Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:35 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:01 AM Lad, Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:01 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 7:22 PM Lad Prabhakar
> > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> > > > The Renesas RZ/Five SoC has a RISC-V AX45MP AndesCore with NCEPLIC100. The
> > > > NCEPLIC100 supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts. In
> > > > case of edge-triggered interrupts NCEPLIC100 ignores the next interrupt
> > > > edge until the previous completion message has been received and
> > > > NCEPLIC100 doesn't support pending interrupt counter, hence losing the
> > > > interrupts if not acknowledged in time.
> > > >
> > > > So the workaround for edge-triggered interrupts to be handled correctly
> > > > and without losing is that it needs to be acknowledged first and then
> > > > handler must be run so that we don't miss on the next edge-triggered
> > > > interrupt.
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds a new compatible string for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and adds
> > > > support to change interrupt flow based on the interrupt type. It also
> > > > implements irq_ack and irq_set_type callbacks.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
>
> > > > @@ -163,10 +166,31 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
> > > > }
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > +static void plic_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > No check for RZ/Five or irq type?
> > That is because we set the handle_fasteoi_ack_irq() only in case of
> > RZ/Five and it is already checked in set_type() callback.
> >
> > > .irq_ack() seems to be called for level interrupts, too
> > > (from handle_level_irq() through mask_ack_irq()).
> > >
> > Right but we are using handle_fasteoi_irq() for level interrupt which
> > doesn't call mask_ack_irq(). And I have confirmed by adding a print in
> > ack callback and just enabling the serial (which has level
> > interrupts).
>
> But handle_fasteoi_irq() is configured only on RZ/Five below?
> Which handler is used on non-RZ/Five?
>
For non RZ/Five, handle_fasteoi_irq() [0] is used for both edge/level
interrupts.
[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c?h=next-20220525#n195
> I have to admit I'm not that deep into irq handling, and
> adding a print indeed doesn't trigger on Starlight Beta.
>
> > > > @@ -176,11 +200,37 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int plic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (handler->priv->of_data != RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + switch (type) {
> > > > + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> > > > + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> > > > + break;
> > > > +
> > > > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> > > > + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_fasteoi_ack_irq);
> > > > + break;
> > > > +
> > > > + default:
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
> > > > .name = "SiFive PLIC",
> > > > .irq_mask = plic_irq_mask,
> > > > .irq_unmask = plic_irq_unmask,
> > > > + .irq_ack = plic_irq_ack,
> > >
> > > This causes extra processing on non-affected PLICs.
> > > Perhaps use a separate irq_chip instance?
> > >
> > I don't think so as the handle_fasteoi_ack_irq() is installed only in
> > case of RZ/Five, so irq_ack() will not be called for non-affected
> > PLIC's. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Hence I'll leave this to the irq maintainer...
>
> > > > @@ -293,6 +356,9 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node *node,
> > > > if (!priv)
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "renesas-r9a07g043-plic"))
> > > > + priv->of_data = RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > So perhaps instead just look at #interrupt-cells, and use the onecell
> > > or twocell irq_chip/irq_domain_ops based on that?
> > >
> > But we do call plic_irq_domain_translate() in the alloc callback and
> > don't have a node pointer in there to check the interrupt cell count.
> > Or maybe we can store the interrupt cell count in priv and use it
> > accordingly above?
>
> That's a reasonable option.
>
Ok I will update this in v2.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-25 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 17:22 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add PLIC support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC Lad Prabhakar
2022-05-24 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: sifive,plic: Document " Lad Prabhakar
2022-06-05 14:23 ` Rob Herring
2022-06-24 9:59 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-07-06 21:58 ` Rob Herring
2022-07-07 9:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-12 18:19 ` Rob Herring
2022-07-12 19:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-22 18:09 ` Rob Herring
2022-06-09 9:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-24 10:01 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-05-24 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add support for " Lad Prabhakar
2022-05-25 8:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-25 9:00 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-05-25 9:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-25 9:43 ` Lad, Prabhakar [this message]
2022-05-25 11:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-27 11:05 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-06 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-07 12:41 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-06-08 10:27 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+V-a8tHfyqJx9YBFX3hJBEKuCbDpminz_4uSLK=MHV7W8-hJg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sagar.kadam@sifive.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).