From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 0/5] DT bindings for Felix DSA switch on LS1028A
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:51:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hr_VpU1yMNat7M=J35cQ__LB69YNvXXsuxg+t4zQS4WkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+h21hop_veYT7Ru6os2iqPV_tO+6vkZPo6sqgVf9GcNAsjWuw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 10:50, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 10:48, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > Hi Shawn,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 08:32, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:12:54PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > As per feedback received in v1, I've changed the DT bindings for the
> > > > > internal ports from "gmii" to "internal". So I would like the entire
> > > > > series to be merged through a single tree, be it net-next or devicetree.
> > > >
> > > > Will applying the patches via different trees as normal cause any
> > > > issue like build breakage or regression on either tree? Otherwise, I do
> > > > not see the series needs to go in through a single tree.
> > > >
> > > > Shawn
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, the point is that I've made some changes in the device tree
> > > bindings validation in the driver, which make the driver without those
> > > changes incompatible with the bindings themselves that I'm
> > > introducing. So I would like the driver to be operational on the
> > > actual commit that introduces the bindings, at least in your tree. I
> > > don't expect merge conflicts to occur in that area of the code.
> >
> > The dt-bindings patch is supposed to go through subsystem tree together
> > with driver changes by nature. That said, patch #1 and #2 are for
> > David, and I will pick up the rest (DTS ones).
> >
> > Shawn
>
> Ok, any further comments on the series or should I respin after your
> feedback regarding the commit message prefix and the status =
> "disabled" ordering?
>
> -Vladimir
By the way all your comments have been on v2 and I've sent v3 already.
So this series is superseded.
Regards,
-Vladimir
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-19 15:12 [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 0/5] DT bindings for Felix DSA switch on LS1028A Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 1/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: delete extraneous #interrupt-cells for ENETC RCIE Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-24 6:34 ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 2/5] net: dsa: felix: Use PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL instead of GMII Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-19 15:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-02-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 3/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: document the vsc9959 core Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-19 15:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-02-22 11:28 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-22 12:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 4/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: add node for Felix switch Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-22 11:38 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-22 12:25 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-22 13:19 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-24 6:36 ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 5/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: enable switch PHYs on RDB Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-22 11:41 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-22 12:17 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-24 6:39 ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-19 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 0/5] DT bindings for Felix DSA switch on LS1028A David Miller
2020-02-22 13:33 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-24 6:31 ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-24 7:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-24 8:48 ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-24 8:50 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-02-24 8:51 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+h21hr_VpU1yMNat7M=J35cQ__LB69YNvXXsuxg+t4zQS4WkA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).