linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX
@ 2017-07-21  9:25 Gary Bisson
  2017-07-21 14:05 ` Fabio Estevam
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gary Bisson @ 2017-07-21  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Guo; +Cc: Fabio Estevam, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, hzpeterchen

Hi Shawn, Fabio,

Last October I offered the following two patches that add regulators
to fix USB PHY reset on 2 of our boards:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395531/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395539/

At the time you preferred to wait for Peter's pwrseq sub-system to get
in to have a proper reset sequence.

Since then, it seems that it's still going to take a long time before
Peter's series makes it to mainline and many customers of ours
complained about USB.

Would you consider adding back those two patches for next cycle. We
can still modify them to use pwrseq in the future.

Regards,
Gary

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX
  2017-07-21  9:25 USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX Gary Bisson
@ 2017-07-21 14:05 ` Fabio Estevam
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2017-07-21 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gary Bisson
  Cc: Shawn Guo, Fabio Estevam, Peter Chen, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Gary,

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Gary Bisson
<gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> wrote:
> Hi Shawn, Fabio,
>
> Last October I offered the following two patches that add regulators
> to fix USB PHY reset on 2 of our boards:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395531/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395539/
>
> At the time you preferred to wait for Peter's pwrseq sub-system to get
> in to have a proper reset sequence.
>
> Since then, it seems that it's still going to take a long time before
> Peter's series makes it to mainline and many customers of ours
> complained about USB.

Yes, it seems that it may take some more time for Peter's pwrseq to be accepted.

> Would you consider adding back those two patches for next cycle. We
> can still modify them to use pwrseq in the future.

What if you resend the patches stating that it is a temporary
workaround until the generic pwrseq bindings are accepted?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-21 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-21  9:25 USB PHY reset for Nitrogen6x/MAX Gary Bisson
2017-07-21 14:05 ` Fabio Estevam

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).