linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] audit: fix a memory leak bug
@ 2019-04-19 15:09 Wenwen Wang
  2019-04-19 19:28 ` Paul Moore
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wenwen Wang @ 2019-04-19 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wenwen Wang
  Cc: Paul Moore, Eric Paris, moderated list:AUDIT SUBSYSTEM, open list

In audit_rule_change(), audit_data_to_entry() is firstly invoked to
translate the payload data to the kernel's rule representation. In
audit_data_to_entry(), depending on the audit field type, an audit tree may
be created in audit_make_tree(), which eventually invokes kmalloc() to
allocate the tree.  Since this tree is a temporary tree, it will be then
freed in the following execution, e.g., audit_add_rule() if the message
type is AUDIT_ADD_RULE or audit_del_rule() if the message type is
AUDIT_DEL_RULE. However, if the message type is neither AUDIT_ADD_RULE nor
AUDIT_DEL_RULE, i.e., the default case of the switch statement, this
temporary tree is not freed.

To fix this issue, only allocate the tree when the type is AUDIT_ADD_RULE
or AUDIT_DEL_RULE.

Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
---
 kernel/auditfilter.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 63f8b3f..923b858 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1114,22 +1114,28 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, int seq, void *data, size_t datasz)
 	int err = 0;
 	struct audit_entry *entry;
 
-	entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
-	if (IS_ERR(entry))
-		return PTR_ERR(entry);
-
 	switch (type) {
 	case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
+		entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
+		if (IS_ERR(entry))
+			return PTR_ERR(entry);
+
 		err = audit_add_rule(entry);
 		audit_log_rule_change("add_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
 		break;
+
 	case AUDIT_DEL_RULE:
+		entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
+		if (IS_ERR(entry))
+			return PTR_ERR(entry);
+
 		err = audit_del_rule(entry);
 		audit_log_rule_change("remove_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
 		break;
+
 	default:
-		err = -EINVAL;
 		WARN_ON(1);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (err || type == AUDIT_DEL_RULE) {
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] audit: fix a memory leak bug
  2019-04-19 15:09 [PATCH v2] audit: fix a memory leak bug Wenwen Wang
@ 2019-04-19 19:28 ` Paul Moore
  2019-04-20  1:46   ` Wenwen Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2019-04-19 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wenwen Wang; +Cc: Eric Paris, moderated list:AUDIT SUBSYSTEM, open list

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:10 AM Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu> wrote:
>
> In audit_rule_change(), audit_data_to_entry() is firstly invoked to
> translate the payload data to the kernel's rule representation. In
> audit_data_to_entry(), depending on the audit field type, an audit tree may
> be created in audit_make_tree(), which eventually invokes kmalloc() to
> allocate the tree.  Since this tree is a temporary tree, it will be then
> freed in the following execution, e.g., audit_add_rule() if the message
> type is AUDIT_ADD_RULE or audit_del_rule() if the message type is
> AUDIT_DEL_RULE. However, if the message type is neither AUDIT_ADD_RULE nor
> AUDIT_DEL_RULE, i.e., the default case of the switch statement, this
> temporary tree is not freed.
>
> To fix this issue, only allocate the tree when the type is AUDIT_ADD_RULE
> or AUDIT_DEL_RULE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
> ---
>  kernel/auditfilter.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

This looks good, it just needs some minor vertical whitespace fixes (see below).

> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 63f8b3f..923b858 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -1114,22 +1114,28 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, int seq, void *data, size_t datasz)
>         int err = 0;
>         struct audit_entry *entry;
>
> -       entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> -       if (IS_ERR(entry))
> -               return PTR_ERR(entry);
> -
>         switch (type) {
>         case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
> +               entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> +               if (IS_ERR(entry))
> +                       return PTR_ERR(entry);
> +

I realize you are taking the blank line from the code above, but we
probably don't need it here.

>                 err = audit_add_rule(entry);
>                 audit_log_rule_change("add_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
>                 break;
> +

Definitely do not add this blank line.

>         case AUDIT_DEL_RULE:
> +               entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> +               if (IS_ERR(entry))
> +                       return PTR_ERR(entry);
> +
>                 err = audit_del_rule(entry);
>                 audit_log_rule_change("remove_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
>                 break;
> +

Same here.

>         default:
> -               err = -EINVAL;
>                 WARN_ON(1);
> +               return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
>         if (err || type == AUDIT_DEL_RULE) {
> --
> 2.7.4

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] audit: fix a memory leak bug
  2019-04-19 19:28 ` Paul Moore
@ 2019-04-20  1:46   ` Wenwen Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wenwen Wang @ 2019-04-20  1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Moore
  Cc: Eric Paris, moderated list:AUDIT SUBSYSTEM, open list, Wenwen Wang

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:28 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:10 AM Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu> wrote:
> >
> > In audit_rule_change(), audit_data_to_entry() is firstly invoked to
> > translate the payload data to the kernel's rule representation. In
> > audit_data_to_entry(), depending on the audit field type, an audit tree may
> > be created in audit_make_tree(), which eventually invokes kmalloc() to
> > allocate the tree.  Since this tree is a temporary tree, it will be then
> > freed in the following execution, e.g., audit_add_rule() if the message
> > type is AUDIT_ADD_RULE or audit_del_rule() if the message type is
> > AUDIT_DEL_RULE. However, if the message type is neither AUDIT_ADD_RULE nor
> > AUDIT_DEL_RULE, i.e., the default case of the switch statement, this
> > temporary tree is not freed.
> >
> > To fix this issue, only allocate the tree when the type is AUDIT_ADD_RULE
> > or AUDIT_DEL_RULE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
> > ---
> >  kernel/auditfilter.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> This looks good, it just needs some minor vertical whitespace fixes (see below).
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > index 63f8b3f..923b858 100644
> > --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > @@ -1114,22 +1114,28 @@ int audit_rule_change(int type, int seq, void *data, size_t datasz)
> >         int err = 0;
> >         struct audit_entry *entry;
> >
> > -       entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(entry))
> > -               return PTR_ERR(entry);
> > -
> >         switch (type) {
> >         case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
> > +               entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> > +               if (IS_ERR(entry))
> > +                       return PTR_ERR(entry);
> > +
>
> I realize you are taking the blank line from the code above, but we
> probably don't need it here.
>
> >                 err = audit_add_rule(entry);
> >                 audit_log_rule_change("add_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
> >                 break;
> > +
>
> Definitely do not add this blank line.
>
> >         case AUDIT_DEL_RULE:
> > +               entry = audit_data_to_entry(data, datasz);
> > +               if (IS_ERR(entry))
> > +                       return PTR_ERR(entry);
> > +
> >                 err = audit_del_rule(entry);
> >                 audit_log_rule_change("remove_rule", &entry->rule, !err);
> >                 break;
> > +
>
> Same here.
>
Thanks for your comments. I will remove the blank lines.

Wenwen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-20  1:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-19 15:09 [PATCH v2] audit: fix a memory leak bug Wenwen Wang
2019-04-19 19:28 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-20  1:46   ` Wenwen Wang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).