From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
To: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] LoongArch: Add unaligned access support
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:32:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5y5wz0VzFEHrkDpap4wczWXBn_ibL3LW_JQyYkMzjDXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c34a277a-1735-65e6-c97d-fcc2ac3d57e6@xen0n.name>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:29 AM WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name> wrote:
>
> On 2022/10/18 10:24, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, David,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:58 PM David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Huacai Chen
> >>> Sent: 17 October 2022 03:24
> >>>
> >>> Loongson-2 series (Loongson-2K500, Loongson-2K1000) don't support
> >>> unaligned access in hardware, while Loongson-3 series (Loongson-3A5000,
> >>> Loongson-3C5000) are configurable whether support unaligned access in
> >>> hardware. This patch add unaligned access emulation for those LoongArch
> >>> processors without hardware support.
> >>>
> >> ...
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * This load never faults.
> >>> + */
> >>> + __get_inst(&insn.word, pc, user);
> >>
> >> On what basis does it never fault?
> >> Any user access can fault.
> >> If nothing else another thread of the process can unmap
> >> the page.
> > Yes, this can happen, since __get_inst() handles fault, we can just
> > remove the comment.
> >
> >>
> >>> + if (user && !access_ok(addr, 8))
> >>> + goto sigbus;
> >>
> >> Surely that is technically wrong - a two or four byte
> >> access is valid right at the end of valid user addreeses.
> > Yes, this check should be moved to each case.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + if (insn.reg2i12_format.opcode == ldd_op ||
> >>> + insn.reg2i14_format.opcode == ldptrd_op ||
> >>> + insn.reg3_format.opcode == ldxd_op) {
> >>> + res = unaligned_read(addr, &value, 8, 1);
> >>
> >> That is the most horrid indentation of long lines I've
> >> ever seen.
> >> I'd also guess you can common up some of this code
> >> by looking at the instruction field that include the
> >> transfer width.
> >>
> >> The long elsif list will generate horrid code.
> >> But maybe since you've just taken a fault it really
> >> doesn't matter.
> >> Indeed just emulating in C using byte accesses
> >> it probably fine.
> > I want to keep the assembly, because we can use more efficient methods
> > with the upcoming alternative mechanism.
>
> What about my more structured approach in another reply that avoids the
> huge else-if conditions? Both the terrible line wraps and codegen could
> be avoided.
OK, let me try.
Huacai
>
> --
> WANG "xen0n" Xuerui
>
> Linux/LoongArch mailing list: https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 2:23 [PATCH V2] LoongArch: Add unaligned access support Huacai Chen
2022-10-17 4:22 ` Jinyang He
2022-10-17 7:37 ` Huacai Chen
2022-10-17 6:07 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-10-17 7:40 ` Huacai Chen
2022-10-17 8:59 ` Rui Wang
2022-10-17 9:03 ` Huacai Chen
2022-10-17 9:19 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-10-17 12:58 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 2:24 ` Huacai Chen
2022-10-18 3:29 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-10-18 7:32 ` Huacai Chen [this message]
2022-10-18 7:48 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 8:09 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-10-18 9:36 ` Huacai Chen
2022-10-17 14:19 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAhV-H5y5wz0VzFEHrkDpap4wczWXBn_ibL3LW_JQyYkMzjDXQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixuefeng@loongson.cn \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).