* [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output
@ 2022-11-23 18:25 Rae Moar
2022-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit " Rae Moar
2022-11-24 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant " David Gow
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rae Moar @ 2022-11-23 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brendanhiggins, davidgow, dlatypov
Cc: skhan, mauro.chehab, kunit-dev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest,
isabbasso, anders.roxell, Rae Moar
Change the KUnit parser to be able to parse test output that complies with
the KTAP version 1 specification format found here:
https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html. Ensure the parser
is able to parse tests with the original KUnit test output format as
well.
KUnit parser now accepts any of the following test output formats:
Original KUnit test output format:
TAP version 14
1..1
# Subtest: kunit-test-suite
1..3
ok 1 - kunit_test_1
ok 2 - kunit_test_2
ok 3 - kunit_test_3
# kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 - kunit-test-suite
KTAP version 1 test output format:
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
1..3
ok 1 kunit_test_1
ok 2 kunit_test_2
ok 3 kunit_test_3
ok 1 kunit-test-suite
New KUnit test output format (changes made in the next patch of
this series):
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: kunit-test-suite
1..3
ok 1 kunit_test_1
ok 2 kunit_test_2
ok 3 kunit_test_3
# kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 kunit-test-suite
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+GJov4QZ8yrD8sgGeMYJ4zYkg2CEUX8owqzPFE0BQGe_f0bFQ@mail.gmail.com/
- Rebased onto linux-kselftest/kunit to correct merge conflict with
recently approved patch
- Fixed typo
- Added test_parse_subtest_header to test whether the “# Subtest:”
line is being parsed correctly when using the new test format
Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104194705.3245738-2-rmoar@google.com/
- Switch order of patches to make changes to the parser before making
changes to the test output
- Change placeholder label for test header from “Test suite” to empty
string
- Change parser to approve the new KTAP version line in the subtest header
to be before the subtest header line rather than after.
- Note: Considered changing parser to allow for the top-level of testing
to have a '# Subtest' line as discussed in v1 but this breaks the missing
test plan test. So I think it would be best to add this ability at a later
time or after top-level test name and result lines are discussed for
KTAP v2.
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 79 ++++++++++++-------
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 14 ++++
.../test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log | 8 ++
| 7 ++
4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index d0ed5dd5cfc4..4cc2f8b7ecd0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: LineStream) -> List[str]:
- '# Subtest: [test name]'
- '[ok|not ok] [test number] [-] [test name] [optional skip
directive]'
+ - 'KTAP version [version number]'
Parameters:
lines - LineStream of KTAP output to parse
@@ -449,8 +450,9 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: LineStream) -> List[str]:
Log of diagnostic lines
"""
log = [] # type: List[str]
- while lines and not TEST_RESULT.match(lines.peek()) and not \
- TEST_HEADER.match(lines.peek()):
+ non_diagnostic_lines = [TEST_RESULT, TEST_HEADER, KTAP_START]
+ while lines and not any(re.match(lines.peek())
+ for re in non_diagnostic_lines):
log.append(lines.pop())
return log
@@ -496,11 +498,15 @@ def print_test_header(test: Test) -> None:
test - Test object representing current test being printed
"""
message = test.name
+ if message != "":
+ # Add a leading space before the subtest counts only if a test name
+ # is provided using a "# Subtest" header line.
+ message += " "
if test.expected_count:
if test.expected_count == 1:
- message += ' (1 subtest)'
+ message += '(1 subtest)'
else:
- message += f' ({test.expected_count} subtests)'
+ message += f'({test.expected_count} subtests)'
stdout.print_with_timestamp(format_test_divider(message, len(message)))
def print_log(log: Iterable[str]) -> None:
@@ -647,7 +653,7 @@ def bubble_up_test_results(test: Test) -> None:
elif test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
test.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
-def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
+def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str], is_subtest: bool) -> Test:
"""
Finds next test to parse in LineStream, creates new Test object,
parses any subtests of the test, populates Test object with all
@@ -665,15 +671,32 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
1..4
[subtests]
- - Subtest header line
+ - Subtest header (must include either the KTAP version line or
+ "# Subtest" header line)
- Example:
+ Example (preferred format with both KTAP version line and
+ "# Subtest" line):
+
+ KTAP version 1
+ # Subtest: name
+ 1..3
+ [subtests]
+ ok 1 name
+
+ Example (only "# Subtest" line):
# Subtest: name
1..3
[subtests]
ok 1 name
+ Example (only KTAP version line, compliant with KTAP v1 spec):
+
+ KTAP version 1
+ 1..3
+ [subtests]
+ ok 1 name
+
- Test result line
Example:
@@ -685,28 +708,29 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
expected_num - expected test number for test to be parsed
log - list of strings containing any preceding diagnostic lines
corresponding to the current test
+ is_subtest - boolean indicating whether test is a subtest
Return:
Test object populated with characteristics and any subtests
"""
test = Test()
test.log.extend(log)
- parent_test = False
- main = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
- if main:
- # If KTAP/TAP header is found, attempt to parse
+ if not is_subtest:
+ # If parsing the main/top-level test, parse KTAP version line and
# test plan
test.name = "main"
+ ktap_line = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
parse_test_plan(lines, test)
parent_test = True
else:
- # If KTAP/TAP header is not found, test must be subtest
- # header or test result line so parse attempt to parser
- # subtest header
- parent_test = parse_test_header(lines, test)
+ # If not the main test, attempt to parse a test header containing
+ # the KTAP version line and/or subtest header line
+ ktap_line = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
+ subtest_line = parse_test_header(lines, test)
+ parent_test = (ktap_line or subtest_line)
if parent_test:
- # If subtest header is found, attempt to parse
- # test plan and print header
+ # If KTAP version line and/or subtest header is found, attempt
+ # to parse test plan and print test header
parse_test_plan(lines, test)
print_test_header(test)
expected_count = test.expected_count
@@ -721,7 +745,7 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
sub_log = parse_diagnostic(lines)
sub_test = Test()
if not lines or (peek_test_name_match(lines, test) and
- not main):
+ is_subtest):
if expected_count and test_num <= expected_count:
# If parser reaches end of test before
# parsing expected number of subtests, print
@@ -735,20 +759,19 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
test.log.extend(sub_log)
break
else:
- sub_test = parse_test(lines, test_num, sub_log)
+ sub_test = parse_test(lines, test_num, sub_log, True)
subtests.append(sub_test)
test_num += 1
test.subtests = subtests
- if not main:
+ if is_subtest:
# If not main test, look for test result line
test.log.extend(parse_diagnostic(lines))
- if (parent_test and peek_test_name_match(lines, test)) or \
- not parent_test:
- parse_test_result(lines, test, expected_num)
- else:
+ if test.name != "" and not peek_test_name_match(lines, test):
test.add_error('missing subtest result line!')
+ else:
+ parse_test_result(lines, test, expected_num)
- # Check for there being no tests
+ # Check for there being no subtests within parent test
if parent_test and len(subtests) == 0:
# Don't override a bad status if this test had one reported.
# Assumption: no subtests means CRASHED is from Test.__init__()
@@ -758,11 +781,11 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
# Add statuses to TestCounts attribute in Test object
bubble_up_test_results(test)
- if parent_test and not main:
+ if parent_test and is_subtest:
# If test has subtests and is not the main test object, print
# footer.
print_test_footer(test)
- elif not main:
+ elif is_subtest:
print_test_result(test)
return test
@@ -785,7 +808,7 @@ def parse_run_tests(kernel_output: Iterable[str]) -> Test:
test.add_error('Could not find any KTAP output. Did any KUnit tests run?')
test.status = TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS
else:
- test = parse_test(lines, 0, [])
+ test = parse_test(lines, 0, [], False)
if test.status != TestStatus.NO_TESTS:
test.status = test.counts.get_status()
stdout.print_with_timestamp(DIVIDER)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 84a08cf07242..d7f669cbf2a8 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -312,6 +312,20 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(kunit_parser._summarize_failed_tests(result),
'Failures: all_failed_suite, some_failed_suite.test2')
+ def test_ktap_format(self):
+ ktap_log = test_data_path('test_parse_ktap_output.log')
+ with open(ktap_log) as file:
+ result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=3))
+ self.assertEqual('suite', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual('case_1', result.subtests[0].subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual('case_2', result.subtests[0].subtests[1].name)
+
+ def test_parse_subtest_header(self):
+ ktap_log = test_data_path('test_parse_subtest_header.log')
+ with open(ktap_log) as file:
+ result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
+ self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('suite (1 subtest)'))
def line_stream_from_strs(strs: Iterable[str]) -> kunit_parser.LineStream:
return kunit_parser.LineStream(enumerate(strs, start=1))
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ccdf244e5303
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+KTAP version 1
+1..1
+ KTAP version 1
+ 1..3
+ ok 1 case_1
+ ok 2 case_2
+ ok 3 case_3
+ok 1 suite
--git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..216631092e7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+KTAP version 1
+1..1
+ KTAP version 1
+ # Subtest: suite
+ 1..1
+ ok 1 test
+ok 1 suite
\ No newline at end of file
base-commit: 99c8c9276be71e6bc98979e95d56cdcbe0c2454e
--
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output
2022-11-23 18:25 [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output Rae Moar
@ 2022-11-23 18:25 ` Rae Moar
2022-11-24 8:48 ` David Gow
2022-11-24 12:30 ` Anders Roxell
2022-11-24 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant " David Gow
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rae Moar @ 2022-11-23 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brendanhiggins, davidgow, dlatypov
Cc: skhan, mauro.chehab, kunit-dev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest,
isabbasso, anders.roxell, Rae Moar
Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications
found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html.
1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header
2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines
2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well
Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now
located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the
KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not
expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This
“# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec
(https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is
used to define the test name before the results.
Original output:
TAP version 14
1..1
# Subtest: kunit-test-suite
1..3
ok 1 - kunit_test_1
ok 2 - kunit_test_2
ok 3 - kunit_test_3
# kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 - kunit-test-suite
New output:
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: kunit-test-suite
1..3
ok 1 kunit_test_1
ok 2 kunit_test_2
ok 3 kunit_test_3
# kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 kunit-test-suite
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121184743.1123556-2-rmoar@google.com/
- Made fixes discussed on the v2 patch to now correctly output test
results after second level testing
Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104194705.3245738-1-rmoar@google.com/
- Switch order of patches to make changes to the parser before making
changes to the test output
- Change location of the new KTAP version line in subtest header to be
before the subtest header line
lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 2 +-
lib/kunit/executor.c | 6 +++---
lib/kunit/test.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
index 1048ef1b8d6e..de0ee2e03ed6 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
- seq_printf(seq, "%s %d - %s\n",
+ seq_printf(seq, "%s %d %s\n",
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 9bbc422c284b..74982b83707c 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
{
size_t num_suites = suite_set->end - suite_set->start;
- pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
+ pr_info("KTAP version 1\n");
pr_info("1..%zu\n", num_suites);
__kunit_test_suites_init(suite_set->start, num_suites);
@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
struct kunit_suite * const *suites;
struct kunit_case *test_case;
- /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
- pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
+ /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
+ pr_info("KTAP version 1\n");
for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) {
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 90640a43cf62..1c9d8d962d67 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
+ kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "KTAP version 1\n");
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
suite->name);
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd",
@@ -175,13 +176,13 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
* representation.
*/
if (suite)
- pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n",
+ pr_info("%s %zd %s%s%s\n",
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
test_number, description, directive_header,
(status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
else
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
- KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s",
+ KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd %s%s%s",
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
test_number, description, directive_header,
(status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
@@ -542,6 +543,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
/* Get initial param. */
param_desc[0] = '\0';
test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
+ kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
+ "KTAP version 1\n");
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
"# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
@@ -555,7 +558,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
- "%s %d - %s",
+ "%s %d %s",
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status),
test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
--
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output
2022-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit " Rae Moar
@ 2022-11-24 8:48 ` David Gow
2022-11-24 12:30 ` Anders Roxell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2022-11-24 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rae Moar
Cc: brendanhiggins, dlatypov, skhan, mauro.chehab, kunit-dev,
linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, isabbasso, anders.roxell
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6891 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:26 AM Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> wrote:
>
> Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications
> found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html.
> 1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header
> 2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines
> 2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well
>
> Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now
> located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the
> KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not
> expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This
> “# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec
> (https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is
> used to define the test name before the results.
>
> Original output:
>
> TAP version 14
> 1..1
> # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
> 1..3
> ok 1 - kunit_test_1
> ok 2 - kunit_test_2
> ok 3 - kunit_test_3
> # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 - kunit-test-suite
>
> New output:
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
> KTAP version 1
> # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
> 1..3
> ok 1 kunit_test_1
> ok 2 kunit_test_2
> ok 3 kunit_test_3
> # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 kunit-test-suite
>
> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121184743.1123556-2-rmoar@google.com/
> - Made fixes discussed on the v2 patch to now correctly output test
> results after second level testing
>
> Changes since v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104194705.3245738-1-rmoar@google.com/
> - Switch order of patches to make changes to the parser before making
> changes to the test output
> - Change location of the new KTAP version line in subtest header to be
> before the subtest header line
>
Thanks for fixing those. This looks good to me now.
I'm not aware of anyone who's actively parsing KUnit test results
who'd be broken by this (IIRC, all the CI systems are just grepping
for 'ok' / 'not ok' or actually using kunit.py to parse.)
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> lib/kunit/executor.c | 6 +++---
> lib/kunit/test.c | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> index 1048ef1b8d6e..de0ee2e03ed6 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
> debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "%s %d - %s\n",
> + seq_printf(seq, "%s %d %s\n",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> index 9bbc422c284b..74982b83707c 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> {
> size_t num_suites = suite_set->end - suite_set->start;
>
> - pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n");
> pr_info("1..%zu\n", num_suites);
>
> __kunit_test_suites_init(suite_set->start, num_suites);
> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> struct kunit_suite * const *suites;
> struct kunit_case *test_case;
>
> - /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
> - pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> + /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
> + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n");
>
> for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) {
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index 90640a43cf62..1c9d8d962d67 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
>
> static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> {
> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "KTAP version 1\n");
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
> suite->name);
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd",
> @@ -175,13 +176,13 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
> * representation.
> */
> if (suite)
> - pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n",
> + pr_info("%s %zd %s%s%s\n",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
> test_number, description, directive_header,
> (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
> else
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
> - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s",
> + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd %s%s%s",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
> test_number, description, directive_header,
> (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
> @@ -542,6 +543,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> /* Get initial param. */
> param_desc[0] = '\0';
> test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> + "KTAP version 1\n");
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
>
> @@ -555,7 +558,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
> KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> - "%s %d - %s",
> + "%s %d %s",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status),
> test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
>
> --
> 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output
2022-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit " Rae Moar
2022-11-24 8:48 ` David Gow
@ 2022-11-24 12:30 ` Anders Roxell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anders Roxell @ 2022-11-24 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rae Moar
Cc: brendanhiggins, davidgow, dlatypov, skhan, mauro.chehab,
kunit-dev, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, isabbasso
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:26, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> wrote:
>
> Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications
> found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html.
> 1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header
> 2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines
> 2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well
>
> Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now
> located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the
> KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not
> expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This
> “# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec
> (https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is
> used to define the test name before the results.
>
> Original output:
>
> TAP version 14
> 1..1
> # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
> 1..3
> ok 1 - kunit_test_1
> ok 2 - kunit_test_2
> ok 3 - kunit_test_3
> # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 - kunit-test-suite
>
> New output:
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
> KTAP version 1
> # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
> 1..3
> ok 1 kunit_test_1
> ok 2 kunit_test_2
> ok 3 kunit_test_3
> # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 kunit-test-suite
>
> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cheers,
Anders
> ---
>
> Changes since v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121184743.1123556-2-rmoar@google.com/
> - Made fixes discussed on the v2 patch to now correctly output test
> results after second level testing
>
> Changes since v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104194705.3245738-1-rmoar@google.com/
> - Switch order of patches to make changes to the parser before making
> changes to the test output
> - Change location of the new KTAP version line in subtest header to be
> before the subtest header line
>
> lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> lib/kunit/executor.c | 6 +++---
> lib/kunit/test.c | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> index 1048ef1b8d6e..de0ee2e03ed6 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
> debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case);
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "%s %d - %s\n",
> + seq_printf(seq, "%s %d %s\n",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> index 9bbc422c284b..74982b83707c 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> {
> size_t num_suites = suite_set->end - suite_set->start;
>
> - pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n");
> pr_info("1..%zu\n", num_suites);
>
> __kunit_test_suites_init(suite_set->start, num_suites);
> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> struct kunit_suite * const *suites;
> struct kunit_case *test_case;
>
> - /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
> - pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> + /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
> + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n");
>
> for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) {
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index 90640a43cf62..1c9d8d962d67 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
>
> static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> {
> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "KTAP version 1\n");
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
> suite->name);
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd",
> @@ -175,13 +176,13 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
> * representation.
> */
> if (suite)
> - pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n",
> + pr_info("%s %zd %s%s%s\n",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
> test_number, description, directive_header,
> (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
> else
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
> - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s",
> + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd %s%s%s",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status),
> test_number, description, directive_header,
> (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : "");
> @@ -542,6 +543,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> /* Get initial param. */
> param_desc[0] = '\0';
> test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> + "KTAP version 1\n");
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
>
> @@ -555,7 +558,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>
> kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
> KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> - "%s %d - %s",
> + "%s %d %s",
> kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status),
> test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
>
> --
> 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output
2022-11-23 18:25 [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output Rae Moar
2022-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit " Rae Moar
@ 2022-11-24 8:45 ` David Gow
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2022-11-24 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rae Moar
Cc: brendanhiggins, dlatypov, skhan, mauro.chehab, kunit-dev,
linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, isabbasso, anders.roxell
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14486 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:26 AM Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> wrote:
>
> Change the KUnit parser to be able to parse test output that complies with
> the KTAP version 1 specification format found here:
> https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html. Ensure the parser
> is able to parse tests with the original KUnit test output format as
> well.
>
> KUnit parser now accepts any of the following test output formats:
>
> Original KUnit test output format:
>
> TAP version 14
> 1..1
> # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
> 1..3
> ok 1 - kunit_test_1
> ok 2 - kunit_test_2
> ok 3 - kunit_test_3
> # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 - kunit-test-suite
>
> KTAP version 1 test output format:
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
> KTAP version 1
> 1..3
> ok 1 kunit_test_1
> ok 2 kunit_test_2
> ok 3 kunit_test_3
> ok 1 kunit-test-suite
>
> New KUnit test output format (changes made in the next patch of
> this series):
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
> KTAP version 1
> # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
> 1..3
> ok 1 kunit_test_1
> ok 2 kunit_test_2
> ok 3 kunit_test_3
> # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 kunit-test-suite
>
> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> ---
>
Thanks for fixing these things. This still looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> Changes since v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+GJov4QZ8yrD8sgGeMYJ4zYkg2CEUX8owqzPFE0BQGe_f0bFQ@mail.gmail.com/
> - Rebased onto linux-kselftest/kunit to correct merge conflict with
> recently approved patch
> - Fixed typo
> - Added test_parse_subtest_header to test whether the “# Subtest:”
> line is being parsed correctly when using the new test format
>
> Changes since v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104194705.3245738-2-rmoar@google.com/
> - Switch order of patches to make changes to the parser before making
> changes to the test output
> - Change placeholder label for test header from “Test suite” to empty
> string
> - Change parser to approve the new KTAP version line in the subtest header
> to be before the subtest header line rather than after.
> - Note: Considered changing parser to allow for the top-level of testing
> to have a '# Subtest' line as discussed in v1 but this breaks the missing
> test plan test. So I think it would be best to add this ability at a later
> time or after top-level test name and result lines are discussed for
> KTAP v2.
>
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 79 ++++++++++++-------
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 14 ++++
> .../test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log | 8 ++
> .../test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log | 7 ++
> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> index d0ed5dd5cfc4..4cc2f8b7ecd0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> @@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: LineStream) -> List[str]:
> - '# Subtest: [test name]'
> - '[ok|not ok] [test number] [-] [test name] [optional skip
> directive]'
> + - 'KTAP version [version number]'
>
> Parameters:
> lines - LineStream of KTAP output to parse
> @@ -449,8 +450,9 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: LineStream) -> List[str]:
> Log of diagnostic lines
> """
> log = [] # type: List[str]
> - while lines and not TEST_RESULT.match(lines.peek()) and not \
> - TEST_HEADER.match(lines.peek()):
> + non_diagnostic_lines = [TEST_RESULT, TEST_HEADER, KTAP_START]
> + while lines and not any(re.match(lines.peek())
> + for re in non_diagnostic_lines):
> log.append(lines.pop())
> return log
>
> @@ -496,11 +498,15 @@ def print_test_header(test: Test) -> None:
> test - Test object representing current test being printed
> """
> message = test.name
> + if message != "":
> + # Add a leading space before the subtest counts only if a test name
> + # is provided using a "# Subtest" header line.
> + message += " "
> if test.expected_count:
> if test.expected_count == 1:
> - message += ' (1 subtest)'
> + message += '(1 subtest)'
> else:
> - message += f' ({test.expected_count} subtests)'
> + message += f'({test.expected_count} subtests)'
> stdout.print_with_timestamp(format_test_divider(message, len(message)))
>
> def print_log(log: Iterable[str]) -> None:
> @@ -647,7 +653,7 @@ def bubble_up_test_results(test: Test) -> None:
> elif test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
> test.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
>
> -def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
> +def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str], is_subtest: bool) -> Test:
> """
> Finds next test to parse in LineStream, creates new Test object,
> parses any subtests of the test, populates Test object with all
> @@ -665,15 +671,32 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
> 1..4
> [subtests]
>
> - - Subtest header line
> + - Subtest header (must include either the KTAP version line or
> + "# Subtest" header line)
>
> - Example:
> + Example (preferred format with both KTAP version line and
> + "# Subtest" line):
> +
> + KTAP version 1
> + # Subtest: name
> + 1..3
> + [subtests]
> + ok 1 name
> +
> + Example (only "# Subtest" line):
>
> # Subtest: name
> 1..3
> [subtests]
> ok 1 name
>
> + Example (only KTAP version line, compliant with KTAP v1 spec):
> +
> + KTAP version 1
> + 1..3
> + [subtests]
> + ok 1 name
> +
> - Test result line
>
> Example:
> @@ -685,28 +708,29 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
> expected_num - expected test number for test to be parsed
> log - list of strings containing any preceding diagnostic lines
> corresponding to the current test
> + is_subtest - boolean indicating whether test is a subtest
>
> Return:
> Test object populated with characteristics and any subtests
> """
> test = Test()
> test.log.extend(log)
> - parent_test = False
> - main = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
> - if main:
> - # If KTAP/TAP header is found, attempt to parse
> + if not is_subtest:
> + # If parsing the main/top-level test, parse KTAP version line and
> # test plan
> test.name = "main"
> + ktap_line = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
> parse_test_plan(lines, test)
> parent_test = True
> else:
> - # If KTAP/TAP header is not found, test must be subtest
> - # header or test result line so parse attempt to parser
> - # subtest header
> - parent_test = parse_test_header(lines, test)
> + # If not the main test, attempt to parse a test header containing
> + # the KTAP version line and/or subtest header line
> + ktap_line = parse_ktap_header(lines, test)
> + subtest_line = parse_test_header(lines, test)
> + parent_test = (ktap_line or subtest_line)
> if parent_test:
> - # If subtest header is found, attempt to parse
> - # test plan and print header
> + # If KTAP version line and/or subtest header is found, attempt
> + # to parse test plan and print test header
> parse_test_plan(lines, test)
> print_test_header(test)
> expected_count = test.expected_count
> @@ -721,7 +745,7 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
> sub_log = parse_diagnostic(lines)
> sub_test = Test()
> if not lines or (peek_test_name_match(lines, test) and
> - not main):
> + is_subtest):
> if expected_count and test_num <= expected_count:
> # If parser reaches end of test before
> # parsing expected number of subtests, print
> @@ -735,20 +759,19 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
> test.log.extend(sub_log)
> break
> else:
> - sub_test = parse_test(lines, test_num, sub_log)
> + sub_test = parse_test(lines, test_num, sub_log, True)
> subtests.append(sub_test)
> test_num += 1
> test.subtests = subtests
> - if not main:
> + if is_subtest:
> # If not main test, look for test result line
> test.log.extend(parse_diagnostic(lines))
> - if (parent_test and peek_test_name_match(lines, test)) or \
> - not parent_test:
> - parse_test_result(lines, test, expected_num)
> - else:
> + if test.name != "" and not peek_test_name_match(lines, test):
> test.add_error('missing subtest result line!')
> + else:
> + parse_test_result(lines, test, expected_num)
>
> - # Check for there being no tests
> + # Check for there being no subtests within parent test
> if parent_test and len(subtests) == 0:
> # Don't override a bad status if this test had one reported.
> # Assumption: no subtests means CRASHED is from Test.__init__()
> @@ -758,11 +781,11 @@ def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str]) -> Test:
>
> # Add statuses to TestCounts attribute in Test object
> bubble_up_test_results(test)
> - if parent_test and not main:
> + if parent_test and is_subtest:
> # If test has subtests and is not the main test object, print
> # footer.
> print_test_footer(test)
> - elif not main:
> + elif is_subtest:
> print_test_result(test)
> return test
>
> @@ -785,7 +808,7 @@ def parse_run_tests(kernel_output: Iterable[str]) -> Test:
> test.add_error('Could not find any KTAP output. Did any KUnit tests run?')
> test.status = TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS
> else:
> - test = parse_test(lines, 0, [])
> + test = parse_test(lines, 0, [], False)
> if test.status != TestStatus.NO_TESTS:
> test.status = test.counts.get_status()
> stdout.print_with_timestamp(DIVIDER)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> index 84a08cf07242..d7f669cbf2a8 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> @@ -312,6 +312,20 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
> self.assertEqual(kunit_parser._summarize_failed_tests(result),
> 'Failures: all_failed_suite, some_failed_suite.test2')
>
> + def test_ktap_format(self):
> + ktap_log = test_data_path('test_parse_ktap_output.log')
> + with open(ktap_log) as file:
> + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
> + self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=3))
> + self.assertEqual('suite', result.subtests[0].name)
> + self.assertEqual('case_1', result.subtests[0].subtests[0].name)
> + self.assertEqual('case_2', result.subtests[0].subtests[1].name)
> +
> + def test_parse_subtest_header(self):
> + ktap_log = test_data_path('test_parse_subtest_header.log')
> + with open(ktap_log) as file:
> + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
> + self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('suite (1 subtest)'))
>
> def line_stream_from_strs(strs: Iterable[str]) -> kunit_parser.LineStream:
> return kunit_parser.LineStream(enumerate(strs, start=1))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ccdf244e5303
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_ktap_output.log
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +KTAP version 1
> +1..1
> + KTAP version 1
> + 1..3
> + ok 1 case_1
> + ok 2 case_2
> + ok 3 case_3
> +ok 1 suite
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..216631092e7b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_parse_subtest_header.log
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +KTAP version 1
> +1..1
> + KTAP version 1
> + # Subtest: suite
> + 1..1
> + ok 1 test
> +ok 1 suite
> \ No newline at end of file
>
> base-commit: 99c8c9276be71e6bc98979e95d56cdcbe0c2454e
> --
> 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-24 12:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-23 18:25 [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output Rae Moar
2022-11-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit " Rae Moar
2022-11-24 8:48 ` David Gow
2022-11-24 12:30 ` Anders Roxell
2022-11-24 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant " David Gow
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).