* [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms
@ 2015-08-19 14:22 Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mailbox: dt: Supply bindings for ST's Mailbox IP Lee Jones
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-08-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel, jassisinghbrar, devicetree, Lee Jones
ST's platforms currently support a maximum of 5 Mailboxes, one for
each of the supported co-processors situated on the platform. Each
Mailbox is divided up into 4 instances which consist of 32 channels.
Messages are passed between the application and co-processors using
shared memory areas.
Also included in the set is an example Client which should be generic
enough to use as a testing environment for all Mailbox IPs which use
shared memory or the API to pass messages. With small changes, it
should also be able to test more extravagant implementations.
v2 => v3:
- Controller
- Shared (DT <=> Device Driver) defines removed
- Return actual error codes instead of NULL in xlate()
- Not passing 'direction' configuration via DT anymore
- Removed all accompanying configuration checking code
- Test F/W
- Allow Rx-only and Tx-only controllers to be tested
- Cater for controllers requiring pre-Tx 'signal' to be sent
- Supply 'wr-' message debugfs file
- When written to, will Tx message through Mailbox Framework
- When read from, will print out a hexdump of Rx'ed message
v1 => v2:
- New MACRO() to obtain base address for a given instance
- Move locking into the structure it protects
- Stop checking for 'ready' state when sending data
- Don't clear channel data (that belongs to the API)
- #define register offsets instead of providing via pdata
- Register driver with module_platform_driver()
Lee Jones (5):
mailbox: dt: Supply bindings for ST's Mailbox IP
mailbox: Add support for ST's Mailbox IP
ARM: STi: stih407-family: Add nodes for Mailbox
mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing Mailbox Controllers
ARM: STi: DT: STiH407: Enable Mailbox testing facility
.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt | 52 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 42 ++
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 14 +
drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 4 +
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c | 516 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c | 361 ++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 989 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c
create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/5] mailbox: dt: Supply bindings for ST's Mailbox IP
2015-08-19 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Lee Jones
@ 2015-08-19 14:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support " Lee Jones
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-08-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel, jassisinghbrar, devicetree, Lee Jones
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fb4400
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/sti-mailbox.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+ST Microelectronics Mailbox Driver
+
+Each ST Mailbox IP currently consists of 4 instances of 32 channels. Messages
+are passed between Application and Remote processors using shared memory.
+
+Controller
+----------
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : Should be "st,stih407-mailbox"
+- reg : Offset and length of the device's register set
+- mbox-name : Name of the mailbox
+- #mbox-cells: : Must be 2
+ <&phandle instance channel direction>
+ phandle : Label name of controller
+ instance : Instance number
+ channel : Channel number
+
+Optional properties
+- interrupts : Contains the IRQ line for a Rx mailbox
+- tx-only : Denotes Mailbox cannot receive messages
+
+Example:
+
+mailbox0: mailbox@0 {
+ compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox";
+ reg = <0x08f00000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+ #mbox-cells = <2>;
+ mbox-name = "a9";
+};
+
+Client
+------
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : Many (See the client docs)
+- reg : Shared (between Application and Remote) memory address
+- mboxes : Standard property to specify a Mailbox (See ./mailbox.txt)
+ Cells must match 'mbox-cells' (See Controller docs above)
+
+Optional properties
+- mbox-names : Name given to channels seen in the 'mboxes' property.
+
+Example:
+
+mailbox_test {
+ compatible = "mailbox_test";
+ reg = <0x[shared_memory_address], [shared_memory_size]>;
+ mboxes = <&mailbox2 0 1>, <&mailbox0 2 1>;
+ mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+};
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support for ST's Mailbox IP
2015-08-19 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mailbox: dt: Supply bindings for ST's Mailbox IP Lee Jones
@ 2015-08-19 14:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-02 5:11 ` Jassi Brar
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: STi: stih407-family: Add nodes for Mailbox Lee Jones
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-08-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel, jassisinghbrar, devicetree, Lee Jones
ST's platforms currently support a maximum of 5 Mailboxes, one for
each of the supported co-processors situated on the platform. Each
Mailbox is divided up into 4 instances which consist of 32 channels.
Messages are passed between the application and co-processors using
shared memory areas. It is the Client's responsibility to manage
these areas.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c | 516 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 525 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
index e269f08..2cc4c39 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
@@ -70,4 +70,11 @@ config BCM2835_MBOX
the services of the Videocore. Say Y here if you want to use the
BCM2835 Mailbox.
+config STI_MBOX
+ tristate "STI Mailbox framework support"
+ depends on ARCH_STI && OF
+ help
+ Mailbox implementation for STMicroelectonics family chips with
+ hardware for interprocessor communication.
+
endif
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
index 8e6d822..7cb4766 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
@@ -13,3 +13,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCC) += pcc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_MBOX) += mailbox-altera.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_MBOX) += bcm2835-mailbox.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_STI_MBOX) += mailbox-sti.o
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b1618d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c
@@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
+/*
+ * STi Mailbox
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 ST Microelectronics
+ *
+ * Author: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for ST Microelectronics
+ *
+ * Based on the original driver written by;
+ * Alexandre Torgue, Olivier Lebreton and Loic Pallardy
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "mailbox.h"
+
+#define STI_MBOX_INST_MAX 4 /* RAM saving: Max supported instances */
+#define STI_MBOX_CHAN_MAX 20 /* RAM saving: Max supported channels */
+
+#define STI_IRQ_VAL_OFFSET 0x04 /* Read interrupt status */
+#define STI_IRQ_SET_OFFSET 0x24 /* Generate a Tx channel interrupt */
+#define STI_IRQ_CLR_OFFSET 0x44 /* Clear pending Rx interrupts */
+#define STI_ENA_VAL_OFFSET 0x64 /* Read enable status */
+#define STI_ENA_SET_OFFSET 0x84 /* Enable a channel */
+#define STI_ENA_CLR_OFFSET 0xa4 /* Disable a channel */
+
+#define MBOX_BASE(mdev, inst) ((mdev)->base + (inst * 4))
+
+/**
+ * STi Mailbox device data
+ *
+ * An IP Mailbox is currently composed of 4 instances
+ * Each instance is currently composed of 32 channels
+ * This means that we have 128 channels per Mailbox
+ * A channel an be used for TX or RX
+ *
+ * @dev: Device to which it is attached
+ * @mbox: Representation of a communication channel controller
+ * @base: Base address of the register mapping region
+ * @name: Name of the mailbox
+ * @enabled: Local copy of enabled channels
+ * @lock: Mutex protecting enabled status
+ */
+struct sti_mbox_device {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct mbox_controller *mbox;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ const char *name;
+ u32 enabled[STI_MBOX_INST_MAX];
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ bool txonly;
+};
+
+/**
+ * STi Mailbox platform specfic configuration
+ *
+ * @num_inst: Maximum number of instances in one HW Mailbox
+ * @num_chan: Maximum number of channel per instance
+ */
+struct sti_mbox_pdata {
+ unsigned int num_inst;
+ unsigned int num_chan;
+};
+
+/**
+ * STi Mailbox allocated channel information
+ *
+ * @mdev: Pointer to parent Mailbox device
+ * @instance: Instance number channel resides in
+ * @channel: Channel number pertaining to this container
+ */
+struct sti_channel {
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev;
+ unsigned int instance;
+ unsigned int channel;
+};
+
+static inline bool sti_mbox_channel_is_enabled(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = chan_info->mdev;
+ unsigned int instance = chan_info->instance;
+ unsigned int channel = chan_info->channel;
+
+ return mdev->enabled[instance] & BIT(channel);
+}
+
+static inline
+struct mbox_chan *sti_mbox_to_channel(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
+ unsigned int instance,
+ unsigned int channel)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
+ chan_info = mbox->chans[i].con_priv;
+ if (chan_info &&
+ chan_info->instance == instance &&
+ chan_info->channel == channel)
+ return &mbox->chans[i];
+ }
+
+ dev_err(mbox->dev,
+ "Channel not registered: instance: %d channel: %d\n",
+ instance, channel);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void sti_mbox_enable_channel(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = chan_info->mdev;
+ unsigned int instance = chan_info->instance;
+ unsigned int channel = chan_info->channel;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->lock, flags);
+ mdev->enabled[instance] |= BIT(channel);
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(channel), base + STI_ENA_SET_OFFSET);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdev->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void sti_mbox_disable_channel(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = chan_info->mdev;
+ unsigned int instance = chan_info->instance;
+ unsigned int channel = chan_info->channel;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->lock, flags);
+ mdev->enabled[instance] &= ~BIT(channel);
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(channel), base + STI_ENA_CLR_OFFSET);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdev->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void sti_mbox_clear_irq(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = chan_info->mdev;
+ unsigned int instance = chan_info->instance;
+ unsigned int channel = chan_info->channel;
+ void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance);
+
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(channel), base + STI_IRQ_CLR_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static struct mbox_chan *sti_mbox_irq_to_channel(struct sti_mbox_device *mdev,
+ unsigned int instance)
+{
+ struct mbox_controller *mbox = mdev->mbox;
+ struct mbox_chan *chan = NULL;
+ unsigned int channel;
+ unsigned long bits;
+ void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance);
+
+ bits = readl_relaxed(base + STI_IRQ_VAL_OFFSET);
+ if (!bits)
+ /* No IRQs fired in specified instance */
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* An IRQ has fired, find the associated channel */
+ for (channel = 0; bits; channel++) {
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(channel, &bits))
+ continue;
+
+ chan = sti_mbox_to_channel(mbox, instance, channel);
+ if (chan) {
+ dev_dbg(mbox->dev,
+ "IRQ fired on instance: %d channel: %d\n",
+ instance, channel);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return chan;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t sti_mbox_thread_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = data;
+ struct sti_mbox_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(mdev->dev);
+ struct mbox_chan *chan;
+ unsigned int instance;
+
+ for (instance = 0; instance < pdata->num_inst; instance++) {
+keep_looking:
+ chan = sti_mbox_irq_to_channel(mdev, instance);
+ if (!chan)
+ continue;
+
+ mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
+ sti_mbox_clear_irq(chan);
+ sti_mbox_enable_channel(chan);
+ goto keep_looking;
+ }
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t sti_mbox_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = data;
+ struct sti_mbox_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(mdev->dev);
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info;
+ struct mbox_chan *chan;
+ unsigned int instance;
+ int ret = IRQ_NONE;
+
+ for (instance = 0; instance < pdata->num_inst; instance++) {
+ chan = sti_mbox_irq_to_channel(mdev, instance);
+ if (!chan)
+ continue;
+ chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+
+ if (!sti_mbox_channel_is_enabled(chan)) {
+ dev_warn(mdev->dev,
+ "Unexpected IRQ: %s\n"
+ " instance: %d: channel: %d [enabled: %x]\n",
+ mdev->name, chan_info->instance,
+ chan_info->channel, mdev->enabled[instance]);
+
+ /* Only handle IRQ if no other valid IRQs were found */
+ if (ret == IRQ_NONE)
+ ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ sti_mbox_disable_channel(chan);
+ ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+ }
+
+ if (ret == IRQ_NONE)
+ dev_err(mdev->dev, "Spurious IRQ - was a channel requested?\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static bool sti_mbox_tx_is_ready(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = chan_info->mdev;
+ unsigned int instance = chan_info->instance;
+ unsigned int channel = chan_info->channel;
+ void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance);
+
+ if (!(readl_relaxed(base + STI_ENA_VAL_OFFSET) & BIT(channel))) {
+ dev_dbg(mdev->dev, "Mbox: %s: inst: %d, chan: %d disabled\n",
+ mdev->name, instance, channel);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (readl_relaxed(base + STI_IRQ_VAL_OFFSET) & BIT(channel)) {
+ dev_dbg(mdev->dev, "Mbox: %s: inst: %d, chan: %d not ready\n",
+ mdev->name, instance, channel);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static int sti_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = chan_info->mdev;
+ unsigned int instance = chan_info->instance;
+ unsigned int channel = chan_info->channel;
+ void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance);
+
+ /* Send event to co-processor */
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(channel), base + STI_IRQ_SET_OFFSET);
+
+ dev_dbg(mdev->dev,
+ "Sent via Mailbox %s: instance: %d channel: %d\n",
+ mdev->name, instance, channel);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sti_mbox_startup_chan(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ sti_mbox_clear_irq(chan);
+ sti_mbox_enable_channel(chan);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void sti_mbox_shutdown_chan(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info = chan->con_priv;
+ struct mbox_controller *mbox = chan_info->mdev->mbox;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++)
+ if (chan == &mbox->chans[i])
+ break;
+
+ if (mbox->num_chans == i) {
+ dev_warn(mbox->dev, "Request to free non-existent channel\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Reset channel */
+ sti_mbox_disable_channel(chan);
+ sti_mbox_clear_irq(chan);
+ chan->con_priv = NULL;
+}
+
+static struct mbox_chan *sti_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
+ const struct of_phandle_args *spec)
+{
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = dev_get_drvdata(mbox->dev);
+ struct sti_mbox_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(mdev->dev);
+ struct sti_channel *chan_info;
+ struct mbox_chan *chan = NULL;
+ unsigned int instance = spec->args[0];
+ unsigned int channel = spec->args[1];
+ int i;
+
+ /* Bounds checking */
+ if (instance >= pdata->num_inst || channel >= pdata->num_chan) {
+ dev_err(mbox->dev,
+ "Invalid channel requested instance: %d channel: %d\n",
+ instance, channel);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
+ chan_info = mbox->chans[i].con_priv;
+
+ /* Is requested channel free? */
+ if (chan_info &&
+ mbox->dev == chan_info->mdev->dev &&
+ instance == chan_info->instance &&
+ channel == chan_info->channel) {
+
+ dev_err(mbox->dev, "Channel in use\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Find the first free slot, then continue checking
+ * to see if requested channel is in use
+ */
+ if (!chan && !chan_info)
+ chan = &mbox->chans[i];
+ }
+
+ if (!chan) {
+ dev_err(mbox->dev, "No free channels left\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+ }
+
+ chan_info = devm_kzalloc(mbox->dev, sizeof(*chan_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!chan_info)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ chan_info->mdev = mdev;
+ chan_info->instance = instance;
+ chan_info->channel = channel;
+
+ chan->con_priv = chan_info;
+
+ dev_info(mbox->dev,
+ "Mbox: %s: Created channel: instance: %d channel: %d\n",
+ mdev->name, instance, channel);
+
+ return chan;
+}
+
+static struct mbox_chan_ops sti_mbox_ops = {
+ .startup = sti_mbox_startup_chan,
+ .shutdown = sti_mbox_shutdown_chan,
+ .send_data = sti_mbox_send_data,
+ .last_tx_done = sti_mbox_tx_is_ready,
+};
+
+static const struct sti_mbox_pdata mbox_stih407_pdata = {
+ .num_inst = 4,
+ .num_chan = 32,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id sti_mailbox_match[] = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox",
+ .data = (void *)&mbox_stih407_pdata
+ },
+ { }
+};
+
+static int sti_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
+ struct mbox_controller *mbox;
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev;
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct mbox_chan *chans;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int irq;
+ int ret;
+
+ match = of_match_device(sti_mailbox_match, &pdev->dev);
+ if (!match) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No configuration found\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ pdev->dev.platform_data = (struct sti_mbox_pdata *) match->data;
+
+ mdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mdev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdev);
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ mdev->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (!mdev->base)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_string(np, "mbox-name", &mdev->name);
+ if (ret)
+ mdev->name = np->full_name;
+
+ mdev->txonly = of_property_read_bool(np, "tx-only");
+
+ mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mbox)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ chans = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(*chans) * STI_MBOX_CHAN_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!chans)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ mdev->mbox = mbox;
+
+ spin_lock_init(&mdev->lock);
+
+ /* STi Mailbox does not have a Tx-Done or Tx-Ready IRQ */
+ mbox->txdone_irq = false;
+ mbox->txdone_poll = true;
+ mbox->txpoll_period = 100;
+ mbox->ops = &sti_mbox_ops;
+ mbox->dev = mdev->dev;
+ mbox->of_xlate = sti_mbox_xlate;
+ mbox->chans = chans;
+ mbox->num_chans = STI_MBOX_CHAN_MAX;
+
+ ret = mbox_controller_register(mbox);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* It's okay for Tx Mailboxes to not supply IRQs */
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq < 0) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev,
+ "%s: Registered Tx only Mailbox\n", mdev->name);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
+ sti_mbox_irq_handler,
+ sti_mbox_thread_handler,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT, mdev->name, mdev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't claim IRQ %d\n", irq);
+ mbox_controller_unregister(mbox);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s: Registered Tx/Rx Mailbox\n", mdev->name);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sti_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct sti_mbox_device *mdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ mbox_controller_unregister(mdev->mbox);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver sti_mbox_driver = {
+ .probe = sti_mbox_probe,
+ .remove = sti_mbox_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "sti-mailbox",
+ .of_match_table = sti_mailbox_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(sti_mbox_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics Mailbox Controller");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org");
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:mailbox-sti");
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: STi: stih407-family: Add nodes for Mailbox
2015-08-19 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mailbox: dt: Supply bindings for ST's Mailbox IP Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support " Lee Jones
@ 2015-08-19 14:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing Mailbox Controllers Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: STi: DT: STiH407: Enable Mailbox testing facility Lee Jones
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-08-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel, jassisinghbrar, devicetree, Lee Jones
This patch supplies the Mailbox Controller nodes. In order to
request channels, these nodes will be referenced by Mailbox
Client nodes.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
index 838b812..32da3f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
@@ -565,5 +565,41 @@
<&phy_port2 PHY_TYPE_USB3>;
};
};
+
+ mailbox0: mailbox@0 {
+ compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox";
+ reg = <0x8f00000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+ #mbox-cells = <2>;
+ mbox-name = "a9";
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+
+ mailbox1: mailbox@1 {
+ compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox";
+ reg = <0x8f01000 0x1000>;
+ #mbox-cells = <2>;
+ mbox-name = "st231_gp_1";
+ status = "okay";
+ tx-only;
+ };
+
+ mailbox2: mailbox@2 {
+ compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox";
+ reg = <0x8f02000 0x1000>;
+ #mbox-cells = <2>;
+ mbox-name = "st231_gp_0";
+ status = "okay";
+ tx-only;
+ };
+
+ mailbox3: mailbox@3 {
+ compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox";
+ reg = <0x8f03000 0x1000>;
+ #mbox-cells = <2>;
+ mbox-name = "st231_audio_video";
+ status = "okay";
+ tx-only;
+ };
};
};
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 4/5] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing Mailbox Controllers
2015-08-19 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Lee Jones
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: STi: stih407-family: Add nodes for Mailbox Lee Jones
@ 2015-08-19 14:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: STi: DT: STiH407: Enable Mailbox testing facility Lee Jones
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-08-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel, jassisinghbrar, devicetree, Lee Jones
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
hacked to support any type of Controller.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c | 361 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 370 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
index 2cc4c39..7720bde 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
@@ -77,4 +77,11 @@ config STI_MBOX
Mailbox implementation for STMicroelectonics family chips with
hardware for interprocessor communication.
+config MAILBOX_TEST
+ tristate "Mailbox Test Client"
+ depends on OF
+ help
+ Test client to help with testing new Controller driver
+ implementations.
+
endif
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
index 7cb4766..92435ef 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_MAILBOX) += mailbox.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MAILBOX_TEST) += mailbox-test.o
+
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MHU) += arm_mhu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PL320_MBOX) += pl320-ipc.o
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cac1ba2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 ST Microelectronics
+ *
+ * Author: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+
+#define MBOX_MAX_SIG_LEN 8
+#define MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN 128
+#define MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE 16
+#define MBOX_HEXDUMP_LINE_LEN ((MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE * 4) + 2)
+#define MBOX_HEXDUMP_MAX_LEN (MBOX_HEXDUMP_LINE_LEN * \
+ (MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN / MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE))
+
+static struct dentry *root_debugfs_dir;
+
+struct mbox_test_device {
+ struct device *dev;
+ void __iomem *mmio;
+ struct mbox_chan *tx_channel;
+ struct mbox_chan *rx_channel;
+ char *rx_buffer;
+ char *signal;
+ char *message;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+};
+
+static ssize_t mbox_test_signal_write(struct file *filp,
+ const char __user *userbuf,
+ size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = filp->private_data;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!tdev->tx_channel) {
+ dev_err(tdev->dev, "Channel cannot do Tx\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (count > MBOX_MAX_SIG_LEN) {
+ dev_err(tdev->dev,
+ "Signal length %d greater than max allowed %d\n",
+ count, MBOX_MAX_SIG_LEN);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ tdev->signal = kzalloc(MBOX_MAX_SIG_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tdev->signal)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = copy_from_user(tdev->signal, userbuf, count);
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(tdev->signal);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : count;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations mbox_test_signal_ops = {
+ .write = mbox_test_signal_write,
+ .open = simple_open,
+ .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
+};
+
+static ssize_t mbox_test_message_write(struct file *filp,
+ const char __user *userbuf,
+ size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = filp->private_data;
+ void *data;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!tdev->tx_channel) {
+ dev_err(tdev->dev, "Channel cannot do Tx\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (count > MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN) {
+ dev_err(tdev->dev,
+ "Message length %d greater than max allowed %d\n",
+ count, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ tdev->message = kzalloc(MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tdev->message)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = copy_from_user(tdev->message, userbuf, count);
+ if (ret) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * A separate signal is only of use if there is
+ * MMIO to subsequently pass the message through
+ */
+ if (tdev->mmio && tdev->signal) {
+ print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "Client: Sending: Signal: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
+ MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE, 1, tdev->signal, MBOX_MAX_SIG_LEN, true);
+
+ data = tdev->signal;
+ } else
+ data = tdev->message;
+
+ print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "Client: Sending: Message: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
+ MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE, 1, tdev->message, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN, true);
+
+ ret = mbox_send_message(tdev->tx_channel, data);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(tdev->dev, "Failed to send message via mailbox\n");
+
+out:
+ kfree(tdev->signal);
+ kfree(tdev->message);
+
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : count;
+}
+
+static ssize_t mbox_test_message_read(struct file *filp, char __user *userbuf,
+ size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = filp->private_data;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ char *touser, *ptr;
+ int l = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ touser = kzalloc(MBOX_HEXDUMP_MAX_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!touser)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (!tdev->rx_channel) {
+ ret = snprintf(touser, 20, "<NO RX CAPABILITY>\n");
+ ret = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos,
+ touser, ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (tdev->rx_buffer[0] == '\0') {
+ ret = snprintf(touser, 9, "<EMPTY>\n");
+ ret = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos,
+ touser, ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tdev->lock, flags);
+
+ ptr = tdev->rx_buffer;
+ while (l < MBOX_HEXDUMP_MAX_LEN) {
+ hex_dump_to_buffer(ptr,
+ MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE,
+ MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE, 1, touser + l,
+ MBOX_HEXDUMP_LINE_LEN, true);
+
+ ptr += MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE;
+ l += MBOX_HEXDUMP_LINE_LEN;
+ *(touser + (l - 1)) = '\n';
+ }
+ *(touser + l) = '\0';
+
+ memset(tdev->rx_buffer, 0, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tdev->lock, flags);
+
+ ret = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, touser, MBOX_HEXDUMP_MAX_LEN);
+out:
+ kfree(touser);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations mbox_test_message_ops = {
+ .write = mbox_test_message_write,
+ .read = mbox_test_message_read,
+ .open = simple_open,
+ .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
+};
+
+static int mbox_test_add_debugfs(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev)
+{
+ if (!debugfs_initialized())
+ return 0;
+
+ root_debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("mailbox", NULL);
+ if (!root_debugfs_dir) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to create Mailbox debugfs\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ debugfs_create_file("message", 0600, root_debugfs_dir,
+ tdev, &mbox_test_message_ops);
+
+ debugfs_create_file("signal", 0200, root_debugfs_dir,
+ tdev, &mbox_test_signal_ops);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mbox_test_receive_message(struct mbox_client *client, void *message)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = dev_get_drvdata(client->dev);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tdev->lock, flags);
+ if (tdev->mmio) {
+ print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "Client: Received [MMIO]: ",
+ DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE, 1,
+ tdev->mmio, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN, true);
+ memcpy(tdev->rx_buffer, tdev->mmio, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN);
+
+ } else if (message) {
+ print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "Client: Received [API]: ",
+ DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, MBOX_BYTES_PER_LINE, 1,
+ message, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN, true);
+ memcpy(tdev->rx_buffer, message, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tdev->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client *client, void *message)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = dev_get_drvdata(client->dev);
+
+ if (tdev->mmio) {
+ if (tdev->signal)
+ memcpy(tdev->mmio, tdev->message, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN);
+ else
+ memcpy(tdev->mmio, message, MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN);
+ }
+}
+
+static void mbox_test_message_sent(struct mbox_client *client,
+ void *message, int r)
+{
+ if (r)
+ dev_warn(client->dev,
+ "Client: Message could not be sent: %d\n", r);
+ else
+ dev_info(client->dev,
+ "Client: Message sent\n");
+}
+
+static struct mbox_chan *
+mbox_test_request_channel(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name)
+{
+ struct mbox_client *client;
+ struct mbox_chan *channel;
+
+ client = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*client), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!client)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ client->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ client->rx_callback = mbox_test_receive_message;
+ client->tx_prepare = mbox_test_prepare_message;
+ client->tx_done = mbox_test_message_sent;
+ client->tx_block = true;
+ client->knows_txdone = false;
+ client->tx_tout = 500;
+
+ channel = mbox_request_channel_byname(client, name);
+ if (IS_ERR(channel)) {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request %s channel\n", name);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return channel;
+}
+
+static int mbox_test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int ret;
+
+ tdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tdev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tdev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* It's okay for MMIO to be NULL */
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ tdev->mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(tdev->mmio))
+ tdev->mmio = NULL;
+
+ tdev->tx_channel = mbox_test_request_channel(pdev, "tx");
+ tdev->rx_channel = mbox_test_request_channel(pdev, "rx");
+
+ if (!tdev->tx_channel && !tdev->tx_channel)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+ tdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tdev);
+
+ spin_lock_init(&tdev->lock);
+
+ if (tdev->rx_channel) {
+ tdev->rx_buffer = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tdev->rx_buffer)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ ret = mbox_test_add_debugfs(pdev, tdev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Successfully registered\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mbox_test_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ debugfs_remove_recursive(root_debugfs_dir);
+
+ if (tdev->tx_channel)
+ mbox_free_channel(tdev->tx_channel);
+ if (tdev->rx_channel)
+ mbox_free_channel(tdev->rx_channel);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mbox_test_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "mailbox_test" },
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver mbox_test_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "mailbox_sti_test",
+ .of_match_table = mbox_test_match,
+ },
+ .probe = mbox_test_probe,
+ .remove = mbox_test_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(mbox_test_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic Mailbox Testing Facility");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: STi: DT: STiH407: Enable Mailbox testing facility
2015-08-19 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Lee Jones
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing Mailbox Controllers Lee Jones
@ 2015-08-19 14:22 ` Lee Jones
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-08-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel, jassisinghbrar, devicetree, Lee Jones
This patch supplies a Client node to enable the Mailbox testing
facility. It will be used to send and receive messages from any
given co-processor in order to test the STi Mailbox Controller
driver.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
index 32da3f8..ac1d1ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
@@ -566,6 +566,12 @@
};
};
+ mailbox_test {
+ compatible = "mailbox_test";
+ mboxes = <&mailbox2 1 31>, <&mailbox0 1 31>;
+ mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+ };
+
mailbox0: mailbox@0 {
compatible = "st,stih407-mailbox";
reg = <0x8f00000 0x1000>;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support for ST's Mailbox IP
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support " Lee Jones
@ 2015-10-02 5:11 ` Jassi Brar
2015-10-02 9:32 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jassi Brar @ 2015-10-02 5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, kernel, Devicetree List
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
....
> +
> +#define MBOX_BASE(mdev, inst) ((mdev)->base + (inst * 4))
>
It should be (inst) * 4
> +/**
> + * STi Mailbox device data
> + *
> + * An IP Mailbox is currently composed of 4 instances
> + * Each instance is currently composed of 32 channels
> + * This means that we have 128 channels per Mailbox
> + * A channel an be used for TX or RX
> + *
> + * @dev: Device to which it is attached
> + * @mbox: Representation of a communication channel controller
> + * @base: Base address of the register mapping region
> + * @name: Name of the mailbox
> + * @enabled: Local copy of enabled channels
> + * @lock: Mutex protecting enabled status
> + */
> +struct sti_mbox_device {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + const char *name;
> + u32 enabled[STI_MBOX_INST_MAX];
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + bool txonly;
>
txonly is never used after being initialized from DT :) which is a
good sign. So maybe just drop it and the optional property 'tx-only'.
Cheers!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support for ST's Mailbox IP
2015-10-02 5:11 ` Jassi Brar
@ 2015-10-02 9:32 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-02 9:42 ` Jassi Brar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2015-10-02 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jassi Brar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, kernel, Devicetree List
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> ....
>
> > +
> > +#define MBOX_BASE(mdev, inst) ((mdev)->base + (inst * 4))
> >
> It should be (inst) * 4
I'm guessing you mean:
((mdev)->base + ((inst) * 4))
?
> > +/**
> > + * STi Mailbox device data
> > + *
> > + * An IP Mailbox is currently composed of 4 instances
> > + * Each instance is currently composed of 32 channels
> > + * This means that we have 128 channels per Mailbox
> > + * A channel an be used for TX or RX
> > + *
> > + * @dev: Device to which it is attached
> > + * @mbox: Representation of a communication channel controller
> > + * @base: Base address of the register mapping region
> > + * @name: Name of the mailbox
> > + * @enabled: Local copy of enabled channels
> > + * @lock: Mutex protecting enabled status
> > + */
> > +struct sti_mbox_device {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + const char *name;
> > + u32 enabled[STI_MBOX_INST_MAX];
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > + bool txonly;
> >
> txonly is never used after being initialized from DT :) which is a
> good sign. So maybe just drop it and the optional property 'tx-only'.
Okay.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support for ST's Mailbox IP
2015-10-02 9:32 ` Lee Jones
@ 2015-10-02 9:42 ` Jassi Brar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jassi Brar @ 2015-10-02 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: Jassi Brar, Devicetree List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-arm-kernel, kernel
On 2 October 2015 at 15:02, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Oct 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> ....
>>
>> > +
>> > +#define MBOX_BASE(mdev, inst) ((mdev)->base + (inst * 4))
>> >
>> It should be (inst) * 4
>
> I'm guessing you mean:
>
> ((mdev)->base + ((inst) * 4))
>
> ?
yes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-02 9:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-19 14:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Mailbox: Provide support STi based platforms Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mailbox: dt: Supply bindings for ST's Mailbox IP Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mailbox: Add support " Lee Jones
2015-10-02 5:11 ` Jassi Brar
2015-10-02 9:32 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-02 9:42 ` Jassi Brar
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: STi: stih407-family: Add nodes for Mailbox Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing Mailbox Controllers Lee Jones
2015-08-19 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: STi: DT: STiH407: Enable Mailbox testing facility Lee Jones
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).