From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org, Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@de.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
Alistar Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fsi/sbefifo: Clean up correct FIFO when receiving reset request from SBE
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:08:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XeddtzwL+zwOWwkyYKCSYg7m=jHR1gpoOG6qx2gDjcosQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7d9923c14a423f9e6e9427ad5437a539734a363.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 05:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 16:45 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > From: Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > When the SBE requests a reset via the down FIFO, that is also the
> > FIFO we should go and reset ;)
>
> Is it ?
>
> I no longer work for IBM and dont have access to any of the
> documentation here but I had vague memories that we would get a reset
> request in the down fifo in order to reset the up one since we control
> the up one and the host controls the down one, no ?
Joachim, can you clarify the situation here?
>
> > Fixes: 9f4a8a2d7f9d ("fsi/sbefifo: Add driver for the SBE FIFO")
> > Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@de.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> > ---
> > drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
> > index f54df9ebc8b3..655b45c1f6ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
> > @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int sbefifo_cleanup_hw(struct sbefifo
> > *sbefifo)
> > /* The FIFO already contains a reset request from the SBE ? */
> > if (down_status & SBEFIFO_STS_RESET_REQ) {
> > dev_info(dev, "Cleanup: FIFO reset request set,
> > resetting\n");
> > - rc = sbefifo_regw(sbefifo, SBEFIFO_UP,
> > SBEFIFO_PERFORM_RESET);
> > + rc = sbefifo_regw(sbefifo, SBEFIFO_DOWN,
> > SBEFIFO_PERFORM_RESET);
> > if (rc) {
> > sbefifo->broken = true;
> > dev_err(dev, "Cleanup: Reset reg write failed,
> > rc=%d\n", rc);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 7:15 [PATCH 0/2] fsi: SBE FIFO fixes Joel Stanley
2020-07-24 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsi/sbefifo: Clean up correct FIFO when receiving reset request from SBE Joel Stanley
2020-07-27 5:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-10 3:08 ` Joel Stanley [this message]
2020-07-24 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] fsi/sbefifo: Fix reset timeout Joel Stanley
2020-07-24 14:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-10 3:08 ` Joel Stanley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACPK8XeddtzwL+zwOWwkyYKCSYg7m=jHR1gpoOG6qx2gDjcosQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=FENKES@de.ibm.com \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).