linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Linux Input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] device property: introduce notion of subnodes for legacy boards
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:36:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZtM4G=4r3m6vLTms9MJFkdiOdPFucebO-Z0Kh-3ws3+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920135348.GF11965@kuha.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 6:53 AM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> The child nodes will change the purpose of the build-in property
> support. Originally the goal was just to support adding of build-in
> device properties to real firmware nodes, but things have changed
> quite a bit from that. These child nodes are purely tied to the
> build-in device property support, so we should be talking about adding
> pset type child nodes to pset type parent nodes in the API:
> fwnode_pset_add_child_node(), or something like that.
>
> I'm sorry to be a bit of pain in the butt with this. The build-in
> property support is a hack, it always was. A useful hack, but hack
> nevertheless. That means we need to be extra careful when expanding
> it, like here.

I dunno how we got to here, what I tried to solve and Dmitry tries
to make more general is converting old boardfiles to use fwnode, because
I initially tried to just support gpio descriptors from board files.

If boardfiles is what you mean with "build-in property support" I don't
know, it predates both device tree and ACPI and any other hardware
descriptions on the ARM architecture, from the perspective of these
systems things are fine and the hardware description languages
are the novelty...

But I guess you know because you worked with OMAP :)

So there is something I don't understand here.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-21 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-17 18:15 [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Support children for legacy device properties Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-17 18:15 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/5] device property: split generic properties and property sets Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/5] device property: introduce notion of subnodes for legacy boards Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-19 15:10   ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-19 17:13     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-20 10:16       ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-21 23:33         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-24  7:29           ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-20 13:53   ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-21 15:36     ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2018-09-24 10:20       ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-21 23:31     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-24 13:20       ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-24 18:45         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-25 12:19           ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-10-05 21:47             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-10-11  8:18               ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/5] device property: export property_set structure Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/5] gpiolib: add support for fetching descriptors from static properties Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18  9:02   ` Mika Westerberg
2018-09-18 17:04     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-19  8:33       ` Mika Westerberg
2018-09-17 18:16 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/5] RFC: ARM: simone: Hacked in keys Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-18  4:23 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Support children for legacy device properties Andy Shevchenko
2018-09-18 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-19 19:55 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdZtM4G=4r3m6vLTms9MJFkdiOdPFucebO-Z0Kh-3ws3+g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).