From: Doug Anderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Vivek Gautam <email@example.com> Cc: Evan Green <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Rob Herring <email@example.com>, Andy Gross <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <email@example.com>, Stephen Boyd <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, LKML <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Manu Gautam <email@example.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: qcom-qmp: Utilize fully-specified DT registers Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:36:49 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VoBLh+SFmo8NieRT6LrOopkKRE86xiEMt_ap2gyDZXWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Hi, On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:29 AM Vivek Gautam <email@example.com> wrote: > Thanks for the patch. > I am starting to think that the driver is heavily relying on the > resource indices to request > all these areas ioremapped. Is it a good way forward that driver and the > dt bindings are > chained together? > Should we rather switch to requesting these resources by some names? > > Rob can comment on this possibly. I thought about suggesting that but I know that Rob really doesn't like accessing register ranges by name . Even in cases where you reference things by name Rob likes there to be a fully defined order and once you have a fully defined order you don't really need the names unless you have more than one optional register range. In any case, Rob already gave his review to Evan's bindings change. See: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20181023002903.GA16854@bogus ...so my vote would be to keep it as Evan's patch series has it and not try to bikeshed it. > Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thanks for the review!  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@mail.gmail.com -Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 20:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-24 17:27 [PATCH v4 0/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add UFS DT nodes Evan Green 2018-10-24 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-qmp: Fix register underspecification Evan Green 2018-10-24 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: qcom-qmp: Utilize fully-specified DT registers Evan Green 2018-10-24 18:29 ` Vivek Gautam 2018-10-24 20:36 ` Doug Anderson [this message] 2018-10-25 6:15 ` Vivek Gautam 2018-10-24 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add UFS controller Evan Green 2018-10-24 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add UFS nodes for sdm845-mtp Evan Green 2018-10-24 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add USB PHY lane two Evan Green
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=VoBLh+SFmo8NieRT6LrOopkKRE86xiEMt_ap2gyDZXWw@mail.gmail.com' \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: qcom-qmp: Utilize fully-specified DT registers' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).