linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
@ 2022-08-25  5:37 menglong8.dong
  2022-08-25 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: menglong8.dong @ 2022-08-25  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edumazet
  Cc: rostedt, mingo, davem, imagedong, dsahern, flyingpeng,
	dongli.zhang, linux-kernel

From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>

As Eric reported, the 'reason' field is not presented when trace the
kfree_skb event by perf:

$ perf record -e skb:kfree_skb -a sleep 10
$ perf script
  ip_defrag 14605 [021]   221.614303:   skb:kfree_skb:
  skbaddr=0xffff9d2851242700 protocol=34525 location=0xffffffffa39346b1
  reason:

The cause seems to be passing kernel address directly to TP_printk(),
which is not right.

Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().

(Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
TP_STRUCT__entry)

Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
---
 include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
 		__field(void *,		location)
 		__field(unsigned short,	protocol)
 		__field(enum skb_drop_reason,	reason)
+		__string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
 	),
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
@@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
 		__entry->location = location;
 		__entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
 		__entry->reason = reason;
+		__assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
 	),
 
 	TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
 		  __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
-		  drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
+		  __get_str(reason_str))
 );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
-- 
2.37.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
  2022-08-25  5:37 [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf menglong8.dong
@ 2022-08-25 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
  2022-08-26  4:47   ` Menglong Dong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2022-08-25 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Menglong Dong
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, David Miller, Menglong Dong,
	David Ahern, Hao Peng, Dongli Zhang, LKML

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:37 PM <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
>
> As Eric reported, the 'reason' field is not presented when trace the
> kfree_skb event by perf:
>
> $ perf record -e skb:kfree_skb -a sleep 10
> $ perf script
>   ip_defrag 14605 [021]   221.614303:   skb:kfree_skb:
>   skbaddr=0xffff9d2851242700 protocol=34525 location=0xffffffffa39346b1
>   reason:
>
> The cause seems to be passing kernel address directly to TP_printk(),
> which is not right.

Why ?

It seems this adds an expensive copy of a string that should reside in
rodata section of vmlinux, thus can not disappear...
(Also the ring buffer entry will have a dynamic size ?)

trace_safe_str() is using is_kernel_rodata() which should return true
for drop_reasons[X] ?

$ grep drop_reasons net/core/dropreason_str.c
const char * const drop_reasons[] = {
...



>
> Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
> kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().
>
> (Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
> TP_STRUCT__entry)

Maybe for event/trace filtering purposes ?

>
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
>                 __field(void *,         location)
>                 __field(unsigned short, protocol)
>                 __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
> +               __string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
>         ),
>
>         TP_fast_assign(
> @@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
>                 __entry->location = location;
>                 __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
>                 __entry->reason = reason;
> +               __assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
>         ),
>
>         TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
>                   __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> -                 drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
> +                 __get_str(reason_str))
>  );
>
>  TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
> --
> 2.37.2
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
  2022-08-25 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2022-08-26  4:47   ` Menglong Dong
       [not found]     ` <CANn89iKVpRMDPgiQ1O6=H1M05iXX3o7rGARa1Z6HptWnAgi_Sg@mail.gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Menglong Dong @ 2022-08-26  4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, David Miller, Menglong Dong,
	David Ahern, Hao Peng, Dongli Zhang, LKML

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:37 PM <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> >
> > As Eric reported, the 'reason' field is not presented when trace the
> > kfree_skb event by perf:
> >
> > $ perf record -e skb:kfree_skb -a sleep 10
> > $ perf script
> >   ip_defrag 14605 [021]   221.614303:   skb:kfree_skb:
> >   skbaddr=0xffff9d2851242700 protocol=34525 location=0xffffffffa39346b1
> >   reason:
> >
> > The cause seems to be passing kernel address directly to TP_printk(),
> > which is not right.
>
> Why ?
>

I think it is because of how perf passes data to the user space. From
what 'perf_output_sample()' do, we can know that perf passes the data
of entry (with other data) to the user, and the user generates the output
string from the format string (which can be obtained from
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/event/skb/kfree_skb/format) and the entry data.

Therefore, perf can't get the string of drop reasons from the entry, only
the enum.

> It seems this adds an expensive copy of a string that should reside in
> rodata section of vmlinux, thus can not disappear...
> (Also the ring buffer entry will have a dynamic size ?)
>

It indeed will add additional cost, but it seems unavoidable. In the old
version, __print_symbolic() is used, which will loop all the drop reason
from a array and find corresponding string:

    TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
          __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
          __print_symbolic(__entry->reason,
                   TRACE_SKB_DROP_REASON))

And I think the cost of coping strings may be less than this loop? as the
drop reasons are getting more and more.

> trace_safe_str() is using is_kernel_rodata() which should return true
> for drop_reasons[X] ?
>
> $ grep drop_reasons net/core/dropreason_str.c
> const char * const drop_reasons[] = {
> ...
>
>
>
> >
> > Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
> > kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().
> >
> > (Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
> > TP_STRUCT__entry)
>
> Maybe for event/trace filtering purposes ?
>
> >
> > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> > ---
> >  include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> >                 __field(void *,         location)
> >                 __field(unsigned short, protocol)
> >                 __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
> > +               __string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
> >         ),
> >
> >         TP_fast_assign(
> > @@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> >                 __entry->location = location;
> >                 __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
> >                 __entry->reason = reason;
> > +               __assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
> >         ),
> >
> >         TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
> >                   __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> > -                 drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
> > +                 __get_str(reason_str))
> >  );
> >
> >  TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
> > --
> > 2.37.2
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
       [not found]     ` <CANn89iKVpRMDPgiQ1O6=H1M05iXX3o7rGARa1Z6HptWnAgi_Sg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2022-08-26 15:44       ` Menglong Dong
  2022-08-26 15:53         ` Eric Dumazet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Menglong Dong @ 2022-08-26 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, David Miller, Menglong Dong,
	David Ahern, Hao Peng, Dongli Zhang, LKML

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:07 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:47 PM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:37 PM <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
>> > >
>> > > As Eric reported, the 'reason' field is not presented when trace the
>> > > kfree_skb event by perf:
>> > >
>> > > $ perf record -e skb:kfree_skb -a sleep 10
>> > > $ perf script
>> > >   ip_defrag 14605 [021]   221.614303:   skb:kfree_skb:
>> > >   skbaddr=0xffff9d2851242700 protocol=34525 location=0xffffffffa39346b1
>> > >   reason:
>> > >
>> > > The cause seems to be passing kernel address directly to TP_printk(),
>> > > which is not right.
>> >
>> > Why ?
>> >
>>
>> I think it is because of how perf passes data to the user space. From
>> what 'perf_output_sample()' do, we can know that perf passes the data
>> of entry (with other data) to the user, and the user generates the output
>> string from the format string (which can be obtained from
>> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/event/skb/kfree_skb/format) and the entry data.
>>
>> Therefore, perf can't get the string of drop reasons from the entry, only
>> the enum.
>>
>> > It seems this adds an expensive copy of a string that should reside in
>> > rodata section of vmlinux, thus can not disappear...
>> > (Also the ring buffer entry will have a dynamic size ?)
>> >
>>
>> It indeed will add additional cost, but it seems unavoidable. In the old
>> version, __print_symbolic() is used, which will loop all the drop reason
>> from a array and find corresponding string:
>>
>>     TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
>>           __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
>>           __print_symbolic(__entry->reason,
>>                    TRACE_SKB_DROP_REASON))
>>
>> And I think the cost of coping strings may be less than this loop? as the
>> drop reasons are getting more and more.
>
>
> We are back to original feedback about all this stuff.
>
> Please measure the tax on a workload dropping 5,000,000 packets per second
> when/if a "perf -e skb:kfree_skb" is attempted by a clueless admin :)
>

Okay, I'll do such a test.

> If just using an integer instead of a string has a measurable impact, we probably should stick to an integer.
>
> kfree_skb tracing is really for experts, they probably can have a tool to understand what a particular integer value means.
>
> Then we can also make sure to only add new values to the end of the enum, to have stable integer values among different kernel versions.
>

In fact, this is exactly what I wanted to do. Users can get little information
from the output of perf or ftrace for the kfree_skb event without a
tools, such as dropwatch.

I keep adding new values to the end of the enum. And I tried to
make the enum as uapi, as user space tools need the enum to
understand what the integer values mean. Hmm......that commit
was rejected :)

I'll do the test to see the impact between integer, string copy and
__print_symbolic. Then we can decide the solutions.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

>>
>> > trace_safe_str() is using is_kernel_rodata() which should return true
>> > for drop_reasons[X] ?
>> >
>> > $ grep drop_reasons net/core/dropreason_str.c
>> > const char * const drop_reasons[] = {
>> > ...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
>> > > kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().
>> > >
>> > > (Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
>> > > TP_STRUCT__entry)
>> >
>> > Maybe for event/trace filtering purposes ?
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
>> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
>> > > index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
>> > > --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
>> > > +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
>> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
>> > >                 __field(void *,         location)
>> > >                 __field(unsigned short, protocol)
>> > >                 __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
>> > > +               __string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
>> > >         ),
>> > >
>> > >         TP_fast_assign(
>> > > @@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
>> > >                 __entry->location = location;
>> > >                 __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
>> > >                 __entry->reason = reason;
>> > > +               __assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
>> > >         ),
>> > >
>> > >         TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
>> > >                   __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
>> > > -                 drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
>> > > +                 __get_str(reason_str))
>> > >  );
>> > >
>> > >  TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
>> > > --
>> > > 2.37.2
>> > >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
  2022-08-26 15:44       ` Menglong Dong
@ 2022-08-26 15:53         ` Eric Dumazet
  2022-08-28  5:08           ` Menglong Dong
  2022-08-28  5:21           ` Menglong Dong
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2022-08-26 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Menglong Dong
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, David Miller, Menglong Dong,
	David Ahern, Hao Peng, Dongli Zhang, LKML

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:44 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:07 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:47 PM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:37 PM <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> >> > >
> >> > > As Eric reported, the 'reason' field is not presented when trace the
> >> > > kfree_skb event by perf:
> >> > >
> >> > > $ perf record -e skb:kfree_skb -a sleep 10
> >> > > $ perf script
> >> > >   ip_defrag 14605 [021]   221.614303:   skb:kfree_skb:
> >> > >   skbaddr=0xffff9d2851242700 protocol=34525 location=0xffffffffa39346b1
> >> > >   reason:
> >> > >
> >> > > The cause seems to be passing kernel address directly to TP_printk(),
> >> > > which is not right.
> >> >
> >> > Why ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think it is because of how perf passes data to the user space. From
> >> what 'perf_output_sample()' do, we can know that perf passes the data
> >> of entry (with other data) to the user, and the user generates the output
> >> string from the format string (which can be obtained from
> >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/event/skb/kfree_skb/format) and the entry data.
> >>
> >> Therefore, perf can't get the string of drop reasons from the entry, only
> >> the enum.
> >>
> >> > It seems this adds an expensive copy of a string that should reside in
> >> > rodata section of vmlinux, thus can not disappear...
> >> > (Also the ring buffer entry will have a dynamic size ?)
> >> >
> >>
> >> It indeed will add additional cost, but it seems unavoidable. In the old
> >> version, __print_symbolic() is used, which will loop all the drop reason
> >> from a array and find corresponding string:
> >>
> >>     TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
> >>           __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> >>           __print_symbolic(__entry->reason,
> >>                    TRACE_SKB_DROP_REASON))
> >>
> >> And I think the cost of coping strings may be less than this loop? as the
> >> drop reasons are getting more and more.
> >
> >
> > We are back to original feedback about all this stuff.
> >
> > Please measure the tax on a workload dropping 5,000,000 packets per second
> > when/if a "perf -e skb:kfree_skb" is attempted by a clueless admin :)
> >
>
> Okay, I'll do such a test.
>
> > If just using an integer instead of a string has a measurable impact, we probably should stick to an integer.
> >
> > kfree_skb tracing is really for experts, they probably can have a tool to understand what a particular integer value means.
> >
> > Then we can also make sure to only add new values to the end of the enum, to have stable integer values among different kernel versions.
> >
>
> In fact, this is exactly what I wanted to do. Users can get little information
> from the output of perf or ftrace for the kfree_skb event without a
> tools, such as dropwatch.
>
> I keep adding new values to the end of the enum. And I tried to
> make the enum as uapi, as user space tools need the enum to
> understand what the integer values mean. Hmm......that commit
> was rejected :)

I think that your initial proposal was to stuff __FILE__ or __LINE__
which was a no go, because they would require anyone having fresh
kernel source to make any mapping.

Also, we added SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET in first position in the list.

UAPI would have made this kind of change not possible.

I am not suggesting to make enum skb_drop_reason UAPI, I want this to
be clear :)

>
> I'll do the test to see the impact between integer, string copy and
> __print_symbolic. Then we can decide the solutions.
>
> Thanks!
> Menglong Dong
>
> >>
> >> > trace_safe_str() is using is_kernel_rodata() which should return true
> >> > for drop_reasons[X] ?
> >> >
> >> > $ grep drop_reasons net/core/dropreason_str.c
> >> > const char * const drop_reasons[] = {
> >> > ...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
> >> > > kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().
> >> > >
> >> > > (Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
> >> > > TP_STRUCT__entry)
> >> >
> >> > Maybe for event/trace filtering purposes ?
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> >> > > ---
> >> > >  include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
> >> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> >> > > index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
> >> > > --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
> >> > > +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> >> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> >> > >                 __field(void *,         location)
> >> > >                 __field(unsigned short, protocol)
> >> > >                 __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
> >> > > +               __string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
> >> > >         ),
> >> > >
> >> > >         TP_fast_assign(
> >> > > @@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> >> > >                 __entry->location = location;
> >> > >                 __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
> >> > >                 __entry->reason = reason;
> >> > > +               __assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
> >> > >         ),
> >> > >
> >> > >         TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
> >> > >                   __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> >> > > -                 drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
> >> > > +                 __get_str(reason_str))
> >> > >  );
> >> > >
> >> > >  TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
> >> > > --
> >> > > 2.37.2
> >> > >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
  2022-08-26 15:53         ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2022-08-28  5:08           ` Menglong Dong
  2022-08-28  5:21           ` Menglong Dong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Menglong Dong @ 2022-08-28  5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, David Miller, Menglong Dong,
	David Ahern, Dongli Zhang, LKML

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:54 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:44 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>
> I think that your initial proposal was to stuff __FILE__ or __LINE__
> which was a no go, because they would require anyone having fresh
> kernel source to make any mapping.
>
> Also, we added SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET in first position in the list.
>
> UAPI would have made this kind of change not possible.
>
> I am not suggesting to make enum skb_drop_reason UAPI, I want this to
> be clear :)
>

I think I finally figured out what is happening. (After a whole day of
research).

The old version uses TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() to export the enum
to user space through the format:

        cat /tracing/events/skb/kfree_skb/format
        name: kfree_skb
        ID: 1528
        format:
                field:unsigned short common_type;       offset:0;
 size:2; signed:0;
                field:unsigned char common_flags;       offset:2;
 size:1; signed:0;
                field:unsigned char common_preempt_count;
offset:3;       size:1; signed:0;
                field:int common_pid;   offset:4;       size:4; signed:1;

                field:void * skbaddr;   offset:8;       size:8; signed:0;
                field:void * location;  offset:16;      size:8; signed:0;
                field:unsigned short protocol;  offset:24;
size:2; signed:0;
                field:enum skb_drop_reason reason;      offset:28;
 size:4; signed:0;

        print fmt: "skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
REC->skbaddr, REC->protocol, REC->location,
__print_symbolic(REC->reason, { 1, "NOT_SPECIFIED" }, { 2, "NO_SOCKET"
}, { 3, "PKT_TOO_SMALL" }, { 4, "TCP_CSUM" }, { 5, "SOCKET_FILTER" },
{ 6, "UDP_CSUM" }, { 7, "NETFILTER_DROP" }, { 8, "OTHERHOST" }, { 9,
"IP_CSUM" }, { 10, "IP_INHDR" }, { 11, "IP_RPFILTER" }, { 12,
"UNICAST_IN_L2_MULTICAST" }, { 13, "XFRM_POLICY" }, { 14, "IP_NOPROTO"
}, { 15, "SOCKET_RCVBUFF" }, { 16, "PROTO_MEM" }, { 17,
"TCP_MD5NOTFOUND" }, { 18, "TCP_MD5UNEXPECTED" }, { 19,
"TCP_MD5FAILURE" }, { 20, "SOCKET_BACKLOG" }, { 21, "TCP_FLAGS" }, {
22, "TCP_ZEROWINDOW" }, { 23, "TCP_OLD_DATA" }, { 24, "TCP_OVERWINDOW"
}, { 25, "TCP_OFOMERGE" }, { 26, "TCP_RFC7323_PAWS" }, { 27,
"TCP_INVALID_SEQUENCE" }, { 28, "TCP_RESET" }, { 29, "TCP_INVALID_SYN"
}, { 30, "TCP_CLOSE" }, { 31, "TCP_FASTOPEN" }, { 32, "TCP_OLD_ACK" },
{ 33, "TCP_TOO_OLD_ACK" }, { 34, "TCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATA" }, { 35,
"TCP_OFO_QUEUE_PRUNE" }, { 36, "TCP_OFO_DROP" }, { 37,
"IP_OUTNOROUTES" }, { 38, "BPF_CGROUP_EGRESS" }, { 39, "IPV6DISABLED"
}, { 40, "NEIGH_CREATEFAIL" }, { 41, "NEIGH_FAILED" }, { 42,
"NEIGH_QUEUEFULL" }, { 43, "NEIGH_DEAD" }, { 44, "TC_EGRESS" }, { 45,
"QDISC_DROP" }, { 46, "CPU_BACKLOG" }, { 47, "XDP" }, { 48,
"TC_INGRESS" }, { 49, "UNHANDLED_PROTO" }, { 50, "SKB_CSUM" }, { 51,
"SKB_GSO_SEG" }, { 52, "SKB_UCOPY_FAULT" }, { 53, "DEV_HDR" }, { 54,
"DEV_READY" }, { 55, "FULL_RING" }, { 56, "NOMEM" }, { 57, "HDR_TRUNC"
}, { 58, "TAP_FILTER" }, { 59, "TAP_TXFILTER" }, { 60, "ICMP_CSUM" },
{ 61, "INVALID_PROTO" }, { 62, "IP_INADDRERRORS" }, { 63,
"IP_INNOROUTES" }, { 64, "PKT_TOO_BIG" }, { 65, "MAX" })

perf will convert the enum to string by the information in format.
What the TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() do can be seen in the
update_event_printk(), which will replace the enum name in the format
with its real value. And it seems that this is the right way to export
drop reason string to users.

And without this TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(), the output will be like
this:

  print fmt: "skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
REC->skbaddr, REC->protocol, REC->location,
__print_symbolic(REC->reason, { SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED,
"NOT_SPECIFIED" } ...................

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And the string copy I committed before seems to add a lot
cost. Following is the time spend that I call trace_kfree_skb()
for 50,000,000 times (in ns) in a kernel module with __string()
field (kfree_skb event is enabled, of course):

5129727715
5133374989
5133208716
5131911803
5122289360
5113165536
5113767180
5133562923
5112673360
5127777968

And following is the time with 'drop_reason[reason]':

4004919507
4008643292
4007113108
4004181997
4011144465
4022534656
4022078663
4002597895
4072512068
3990457695

Following is the time that I use __print_symbolic() instead:

4050504157
4049853381
4064370880
4014673377
4063128507
4058000000
4070997417
4017538272
4003874038
4009775761

Seems __print_symbolic() is more efficient than I thought.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I'm not sure we can still keep this 'auto-generate', as we need
to define TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM. The script in
'net/core/Makefile' should be like this
to generate a header, which is used to define the array
'const char * const drop_reasons[]' and
TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM():

  clean-files := $(srctree)/include/net/dropreason_str.h

  quiet_cmd_dropreason_str = GEN     $@
  cmd_dropreason_str = awk -F ',' 'BEGIN{ print "\#include
<net/dropreason.h>\n"; \
      print "\#define __DEFINE_DROP_REASON(FN, FNe) \\"; last = "" }\
      /^enum skb_drop/ { dr=1; }\
      /^\};/ { dr=0; }\
      /^\tSKB_DROP_REASON_/ {\
          if (dr) {\
              if (length(last) != 0)\
                  printf "\tFN(%s) \\\n", last;\
              last = $$1;\
              sub(/\tSKB_DROP_REASON_/, "", last);\
          }\
      }\
      END{ printf "\tFNe(%s)\n", last; }' $< > $@

  $(srctree)/include/net/dropreason_str.h: $(srctree)/include/net/dropreason.h
      $(call cmd,dropreason_str)

  $(obj-y)/*: $(srctree)/include/net/dropreason_str.h

Then, we can define TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM in include/trace/events/skb.h:

  #undef EM
  #define EM(name) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(SKB_DROP_REASON_##name);
  __DEFINE_DROP_REASON(EM, EM)

Thanks!
Menglong Dong



> >
> > I'll do the test to see the impact between integer, string copy and
> > __print_symbolic. Then we can decide the solutions.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Menglong Dong
> >
> > >>
> > >> > trace_safe_str() is using is_kernel_rodata() which should return true
> > >> > for drop_reasons[X] ?
> > >> >
> > >> > $ grep drop_reasons net/core/dropreason_str.c
> > >> > const char * const drop_reasons[] = {
> > >> > ...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
> > >> > > kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().
> > >> > >
> > >> > > (Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
> > >> > > TP_STRUCT__entry)
> > >> >
> > >> > Maybe for event/trace filtering purposes ?
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > >  include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
> > >> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > >> > > index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
> > >> > > --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > >> > > +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > >> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> > >> > >                 __field(void *,         location)
> > >> > >                 __field(unsigned short, protocol)
> > >> > >                 __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
> > >> > > +               __string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
> > >> > >         ),
> > >> > >
> > >> > >         TP_fast_assign(
> > >> > > @@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> > >> > >                 __entry->location = location;
> > >> > >                 __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
> > >> > >                 __entry->reason = reason;
> > >> > > +               __assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
> > >> > >         ),
> > >> > >
> > >> > >         TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
> > >> > >                   __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> > >> > > -                 drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
> > >> > > +                 __get_str(reason_str))
> > >> > >  );
> > >> > >
> > >> > >  TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > 2.37.2
> > >> > >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf
  2022-08-26 15:53         ` Eric Dumazet
  2022-08-28  5:08           ` Menglong Dong
@ 2022-08-28  5:21           ` Menglong Dong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Menglong Dong @ 2022-08-28  5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet
  Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, David Miller, Menglong Dong,
	David Ahern, Hao Peng, Dongli Zhang, LKML

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:54 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:44 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:07 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:47 PM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:37 PM <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > As Eric reported, the 'reason' field is not presented when trace the
> > >> > > kfree_skb event by perf:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > $ perf record -e skb:kfree_skb -a sleep 10
> > >> > > $ perf script
> > >> > >   ip_defrag 14605 [021]   221.614303:   skb:kfree_skb:
> > >> > >   skbaddr=0xffff9d2851242700 protocol=34525 location=0xffffffffa39346b1
> > >> > >   reason:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The cause seems to be passing kernel address directly to TP_printk(),
> > >> > > which is not right.
> > >> >
> > >> > Why ?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> I think it is because of how perf passes data to the user space. From
> > >> what 'perf_output_sample()' do, we can know that perf passes the data
> > >> of entry (with other data) to the user, and the user generates the output
> > >> string from the format string (which can be obtained from
> > >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/event/skb/kfree_skb/format) and the entry data.
> > >>
> > >> Therefore, perf can't get the string of drop reasons from the entry, only
> > >> the enum.
> > >>
> > >> > It seems this adds an expensive copy of a string that should reside in
> > >> > rodata section of vmlinux, thus can not disappear...
> > >> > (Also the ring buffer entry will have a dynamic size ?)
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> It indeed will add additional cost, but it seems unavoidable. In the old
> > >> version, __print_symbolic() is used, which will loop all the drop reason
> > >> from a array and find corresponding string:
> > >>
> > >>     TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
> > >>           __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> > >>           __print_symbolic(__entry->reason,
> > >>                    TRACE_SKB_DROP_REASON))
> > >>
> > >> And I think the cost of coping strings may be less than this loop? as the
> > >> drop reasons are getting more and more.
> > >
> > >
> > > We are back to original feedback about all this stuff.
> > >
> > > Please measure the tax on a workload dropping 5,000,000 packets per second
> > > when/if a "perf -e skb:kfree_skb" is attempted by a clueless admin :)
> > >
> >
> > Okay, I'll do such a test.
> >
> > > If just using an integer instead of a string has a measurable impact, we probably should stick to an integer.
> > >
> > > kfree_skb tracing is really for experts, they probably can have a tool to understand what a particular integer value means.
> > >
> > > Then we can also make sure to only add new values to the end of the enum, to have stable integer values among different kernel versions.
> > >
> >
> > In fact, this is exactly what I wanted to do. Users can get little information
> > from the output of perf or ftrace for the kfree_skb event without a
> > tools, such as dropwatch.
> >
> > I keep adding new values to the end of the enum. And I tried to
> > make the enum as uapi, as user space tools need the enum to
> > understand what the integer values mean. Hmm......that commit
> > was rejected :)
>
> I think that your initial proposal was to stuff __FILE__ or __LINE__
> which was a no go, because they would require anyone having fresh
> kernel source to make any mapping.
>

Almost forget to explain.......That's another buddy, who wanted to
remove the drop reason and replace with __FILE__ and
__LINE__, not me! My initial proposal was to create a tracepoint
for snmp :)

> Also, we added SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET in first position in the list.
>
> UAPI would have made this kind of change not possible.
>
> I am not suggesting to make enum skb_drop_reason UAPI, I want this to
> be clear :)
>
> >
> > I'll do the test to see the impact between integer, string copy and
> > __print_symbolic. Then we can decide the solutions.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Menglong Dong
> >
> > >>
> > >> > trace_safe_str() is using is_kernel_rodata() which should return true
> > >> > for drop_reasons[X] ?
> > >> >
> > >> > $ grep drop_reasons net/core/dropreason_str.c
> > >> > const char * const drop_reasons[] = {
> > >> > ...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Therefore, fix this by adding a '__string' field to the TP_STRUCT of
> > >> > > kfree_skb, which is 'reason_str', and passing it to TP_printk().
> > >> > >
> > >> > > (Not sure if we should still keep the 'reason' field in
> > >> > > TP_STRUCT__entry)
> > >> >
> > >> > Maybe for event/trace filtering purposes ?
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > >  include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +++-
> > >> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > >> > > index 45264e4bb254..7235554141c3 100644
> > >> > > --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > >> > > +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > >> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> > >> > >                 __field(void *,         location)
> > >> > >                 __field(unsigned short, protocol)
> > >> > >                 __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
> > >> > > +               __string(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason])
> > >> > >         ),
> > >> > >
> > >> > >         TP_fast_assign(
> > >> > > @@ -31,11 +32,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> > >> > >                 __entry->location = location;
> > >> > >                 __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
> > >> > >                 __entry->reason = reason;
> > >> > > +               __assign_str(reason_str, drop_reasons[reason]);
> > >> > >         ),
> > >> > >
> > >> > >         TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p reason: %s",
> > >> > >                   __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
> > >> > > -                 drop_reasons[__entry->reason])
> > >> > > +                 __get_str(reason_str))
> > >> > >  );
> > >> > >
> > >> > >  TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb,
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > 2.37.2
> > >> > >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-28  5:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-25  5:37 [PATCH net-next] net: skb: fix kfree_skb event output error in perf menglong8.dong
2022-08-25 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-08-26  4:47   ` Menglong Dong
     [not found]     ` <CANn89iKVpRMDPgiQ1O6=H1M05iXX3o7rGARa1Z6HptWnAgi_Sg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-08-26 15:44       ` Menglong Dong
2022-08-26 15:53         ` Eric Dumazet
2022-08-28  5:08           ` Menglong Dong
2022-08-28  5:21           ` Menglong Dong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).