linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robdclark@gmail.com,
	sean@poorly.run
Cc: abhinavk@codeaurora.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org,
	airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/msm/dp: reduce link rate if failed at link training 1
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 07:33:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52WyMKdQ96ji=5YLBxpndgB_CLsxscXaFexMPdLducrkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1625592020-22658-3-git-send-email-khsieh@codeaurora.org>

Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-07-06 10:20:15)
> Reduce link rate and re start link training if link training 1
> failed due to loss of clock recovery done to fix Link Layer
> CTS case 4.3.1.7.  Also only update voltage and pre-emphasis
> swing level after link training started to fix Link Layer CTS
> case 4.3.1.6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> index 27fb0f0..6f8443d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> @@ -83,13 +83,6 @@ struct dp_ctrl_private {
>         struct completion video_comp;
>  };
>
> -struct dp_cr_status {
> -       u8 lane_0_1;
> -       u8 lane_2_3;
> -};
> -
> -#define DP_LANE0_1_CR_DONE     0x11
> -
>  static int dp_aux_link_configure(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>                                         struct dp_link_info *link)
>  {
> @@ -1080,7 +1073,7 @@ static int dp_ctrl_read_link_status(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
>  }
>
>  static int dp_ctrl_link_train_1(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> -               struct dp_cr_status *cr, int *training_step)
> +               u8 *cr, int *training_step)
>  {
>         int tries, old_v_level, ret = 0;
>         u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
> @@ -1109,8 +1102,8 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_train_1(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
>                 if (ret)
>                         return ret;
>
> -               cr->lane_0_1 = link_status[0];
> -               cr->lane_2_3 = link_status[1];
> +               cr[0] = link_status[0];
> +               cr[1] = link_status[1];
>
>                 if (drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok(link_status,
>                         ctrl->link->link_params.num_lanes)) {
> @@ -1188,7 +1181,7 @@ static void dp_ctrl_clear_training_pattern(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
>  }
>
>  static int dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> -               struct dp_cr_status *cr, int *training_step)
> +               u8 *cr, int *training_step)
>  {
>         int tries = 0, ret = 0;
>         char pattern;
> @@ -1204,10 +1197,6 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
>         else
>                 pattern = DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_2;
>
> -       ret = dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(ctrl);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> -
>         ret = dp_catalog_ctrl_set_pattern(ctrl->catalog, pattern);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> @@ -1220,8 +1209,8 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
>                 ret = dp_ctrl_read_link_status(ctrl, link_status);
>                 if (ret)
>                         return ret;
> -               cr->lane_0_1 = link_status[0];
> -               cr->lane_2_3 = link_status[1];
> +               cr[0] = link_status[0];
> +               cr[1] = link_status[1];
>
>                 if (drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status,
>                         ctrl->link->link_params.num_lanes)) {
> @@ -1241,7 +1230,7 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_train_2(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
>  static int dp_ctrl_reinitialize_mainlink(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl);
>
>  static int dp_ctrl_link_train(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> -               struct dp_cr_status *cr, int *training_step)
> +               u8 *cr, int *training_step)
>  {
>         int ret = 0;
>         u8 encoding = DP_SET_ANSI_8B10B;
> @@ -1282,7 +1271,7 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_train(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
>  }
>
>  static int dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> -               struct dp_cr_status *cr, int *training_step)
> +               u8 *cr, int *training_step)
>  {
>         int ret = 0;
>
> @@ -1496,14 +1485,14 @@ static int dp_ctrl_deinitialize_mainlink(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
>  static int dp_ctrl_link_maintenance(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
>  {
>         int ret = 0;
> -       struct dp_cr_status cr;
> +       u8 cr_status[2];
>         int training_step = DP_TRAINING_NONE;
>
>         dp_ctrl_push_idle(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
>
>         ctrl->dp_ctrl.pixel_rate = ctrl->panel->dp_mode.drm_mode.clock;
>
> -       ret = dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(ctrl, &cr, &training_step);
> +       ret = dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(ctrl, cr_status, &training_step);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto end;

Do we need to extract the link status information from deep in these
functions? Why not read it again when we need to?

>
> @@ -1634,6 +1623,41 @@ void dp_ctrl_handle_sink_request(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
>         }
>  }
>
> +static bool dp_ctrl_any_lane_cr_done(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> +                                       u8 *cr_status)
> +
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       u8 status;
> +       int lane = ctrl->link->link_params.num_lanes;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < lane; i++) {
> +               status = cr_status[i / 2];
> +               status >>= ((i % 2) * 4);
> +               if (status & DP_LANE_CR_DONE)
> +                       return true;
> +       }
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool dp_ctrl_any_lane_cr_lose(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> +                                       u8 *cr_status)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       u8 status;
> +       int lane = ctrl->link->link_params.num_lanes;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < lane; i++) {
> +               status = cr_status[i / 2];
> +               status >>= ((i % 2) * 4);
> +               if (!(status & DP_LANE_CR_DONE))
> +                       return true;
> +       }
> +
> +       return false;
> +}

Why not use !drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok() for dp_ctrl_any_lane_cr_lose()?
And then move dp_ctrl_any_lane_cr_done() next to
drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok() and call it drm_dp_clock_recovery_any_ok()?

> +
>  int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
>  {
>         int rc = 0;
> @@ -1641,7 +1665,7 @@ int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
>         u32 rate = 0;
>         int link_train_max_retries = 5;
>         u32 const phy_cts_pixel_clk_khz = 148500;
> -       struct dp_cr_status cr;
> +       u8 cr_status[2];
>         unsigned int training_step;
>
>         if (!dp_ctrl)
> @@ -1681,19 +1705,18 @@ int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
>                 }
>
>                 training_step = DP_TRAINING_NONE;
> -               rc = dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(ctrl, &cr, &training_step);
> +               rc = dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(ctrl, cr_status, &training_step);
>                 if (rc == 0) {
>                         /* training completed successfully */
>                         break;
>                 } else if (training_step == DP_TRAINING_1) {
>                         /* link train_1 failed */
> -                       if (!dp_catalog_link_is_connected(ctrl->catalog)) {
> +                       if (!dp_catalog_link_is_connected(ctrl->catalog))
>                                 break;
> -                       }
>
>                         rc = dp_ctrl_link_rate_down_shift(ctrl);
>                         if (rc < 0) { /* already in RBR = 1.6G */
> -                               if (cr.lane_0_1 & DP_LANE0_1_CR_DONE) {
> +                               if (dp_ctrl_any_lane_cr_done(ctrl, cr_status)) {
>                                         /*
>                                          * some lanes are ready,
>                                          * reduce lane number
> @@ -1709,12 +1732,15 @@ int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
>                                 }
>                         }
>                 } else if (training_step == DP_TRAINING_2) {
> -                       /* link train_2 failed, lower lane rate */
> -                       if (!dp_catalog_link_is_connected(ctrl->catalog)) {
> +                       /* link train_2 failed */
> +                       if (!dp_catalog_link_is_connected(ctrl->catalog))
>                                 break;
> -                       }
>
> -                       rc = dp_ctrl_link_lane_down_shift(ctrl);
> +                       if (dp_ctrl_any_lane_cr_lose(ctrl, cr_status))
> +                               rc = dp_ctrl_link_rate_down_shift(ctrl);
> +                       else
> +                               rc = dp_ctrl_link_lane_down_shift(ctrl);
> +
>                         if (rc < 0) {
>                                 /* end with failure */
>                                 break; /* lane == 1 already */
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-08  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-06 17:20 [PATCH 0/7] add fixes to pass DP Link Layer compliance test cases Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/msm/dp: use dp_ctrl_off_link_stream during PHY compliance test run Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-08  7:03   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-08 21:33     ` khsieh
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/msm/dp: reduce link rate if failed at link training 1 Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-08  7:33   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2021-07-09 17:46     ` khsieh
2021-07-15 18:59       ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/msm/dp: reset aux controller after dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() failed Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-08  7:34   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-08 21:59     ` khsieh
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/msm/dp: replug event is converted into an unplug followed by an plug events Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-08 20:56   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/msm/dp: return correct edid checksum after corrupted edid checksum read Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-08  7:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-09 18:16     ` khsieh
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/msm/dp: do not end dp link training until video is ready Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/msm/dp: retrain link when loss of symbol lock detected Kuogee Hsieh
2021-07-08  7:21   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-09 17:16     ` khsieh
2021-07-15 19:00       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAE-0n52WyMKdQ96ji=5YLBxpndgB_CLsxscXaFexMPdLducrkQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=aravindh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=khsieh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).