From: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] driver core: Remove the link if there is no driver with AUTO flag
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:53:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE=gft7mWs1jc+KQQcPuuhcmxpFRnRBTt35+uC3F20N6R554bQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546318276-18993-3-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 8:52 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER/SUPPLIER means "Remove the link
> automatically on consumer/supplier driver unbind", that means we should
> remove whole the device_link when there is no this driver no matter what
> the ref_count of the link is.
>
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> The ref_count of our device_link normally is over 1. When the consumer
> device driver is removed, whole the device_link should be removed.
> Thus, I add this patch.
> ---
I will admit to reading about device links for the first time while
reviewing this patch, but I don't really get this. Why use a kref at
all if we're just going to ignore its value? For instance, I see that
if you call device_link_add() with the same supplier and consumer, it
uses the kref to return the same link. That machinery is broken with
your change. Although I don't see any uses of it, you might also
expect a supplier or consumer could do a kref_get() on the link it got
back from device_link_add(), and have a reasonable expectation that
the link wouldn't be freed out from under it. This would also be
broken.
Can you explain why your device_links normally have a reference count
>1, and why those additional references can't be cleaned up in an
orderly fashion?
(To be honest, I don't really understand the case for the AUTOREMOVE
flags at all. Is there some case where the party that set up the link
can't tear it down? Or is this a way to devm_ify the link, where devm
itself doesn't work because the links themselves stall out that
mechanism?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-01 4:51 [PATCH 00/13] Clean up "mediatek,larb" after adding device_link Yong Wu
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 01/13] dt-binding: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek,larb for multimedia HW Yong Wu
2019-01-11 14:58 ` Rob Herring
2019-02-25 23:54 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 02/13] driver core: Remove the link if there is no driver with AUTO flag Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:53 ` Evan Green [this message]
2019-02-27 14:33 ` Yong Wu
2019-03-05 19:03 ` Evan Green
2019-03-12 14:21 ` Matthias Brugger
2019-03-12 23:17 ` Evan Green
2019-03-13 9:08 ` Yong Wu
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 03/13] iommu/mediatek: Add probe_defer for smi-larb Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:54 ` Evan Green
2019-02-27 14:33 ` Yong Wu
2019-03-05 19:02 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 04/13] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:54 ` Evan Green
2019-02-27 14:34 ` Yong Wu
2019-02-27 19:30 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-13 9:11 ` Yong Wu
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 05/13] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between smi-larb and smi-common Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:54 ` Evan Green
2019-02-27 14:33 ` Yong Wu
2019-03-05 19:02 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 06/13] media: mtk-jpeg: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:55 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 07/13] media: mtk-mdp: " Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:55 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 08/13] media: mtk-vcodec: " Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:55 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/mediatek: " Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:55 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 10/13] memory: mtk-smi: " Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:56 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 11/13] iommu/mediatek: Use builtin_platform_driver Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:56 ` Evan Green
2019-02-27 14:33 ` Yong Wu
2019-03-05 19:03 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek,larb for MM nodes Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:56 ` Evan Green
2019-01-01 4:51 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64: " Yong Wu
2019-02-25 23:56 ` Evan Green
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAE=gft7mWs1jc+KQQcPuuhcmxpFRnRBTt35+uC3F20N6R554bQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@google.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).