* [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
@ 2023-01-18 7:56 Tiezhu Yang
2023-01-18 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2023-01-18 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
Lorenzo Bianconi
Cc: bpf, linux-kernel
If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
$ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
^
progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
^
2 errors generated.
Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
index 227e85e..9fc603c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ __be16 dport = 0;
int test_exist_lookup = -ENOENT;
u32 test_exist_lookup_mark = 0;
+enum nf_nat_manip_type___local {
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local,
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local
+};
+
struct nf_conn;
struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
@@ -58,7 +63,7 @@ int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
int bpf_ct_set_nat_info(struct nf_conn *, union nf_inet_addr *,
- int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type) __ksym;
+ int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type___local) __ksym;
static __always_inline void
nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
@@ -157,10 +162,10 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
/* snat */
saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
- bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
+ bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
/* dnat */
daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
- bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
+ bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
if (ct_ins) {
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-01-18 7:56 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m Tiezhu Yang
@ 2023-01-18 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-01-18 19:42 ` Yonghong Song
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2023-01-18 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo,
Lorenzo Bianconi, bpf, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 03:56:44PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
>
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>
> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> ^
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
>
> Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
> in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
> ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
> Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
>
> Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
I hit the same problem, thanks
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
jirka
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> index 227e85e..9fc603c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ __be16 dport = 0;
> int test_exist_lookup = -ENOENT;
> u32 test_exist_lookup_mark = 0;
>
> +enum nf_nat_manip_type___local {
> + NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local,
> + NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local
> +};
> +
> struct nf_conn;
>
> struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
> @@ -58,7 +63,7 @@ int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> int bpf_ct_set_nat_info(struct nf_conn *, union nf_inet_addr *,
> - int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type) __ksym;
> + int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type___local) __ksym;
>
> static __always_inline void
> nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
> @@ -157,10 +162,10 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>
> /* snat */
> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
> /* dnat */
> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
>
> ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
> if (ct_ins) {
> --
> 2.1.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-01-18 7:56 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m Tiezhu Yang
2023-01-18 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2023-01-18 19:42 ` Yonghong Song
2023-01-18 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-23 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2023-01-18 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang, Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
Lorenzo Bianconi
Cc: bpf, linux-kernel
On 1/17/23 11:56 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
>
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>
> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> ^
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
>
> Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
> in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
> ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
> Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
>
> Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Okay, LGTM. We will address enum CORE support with preserve_access_index
attribute later.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-01-18 7:56 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m Tiezhu Yang
2023-01-18 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-01-18 19:42 ` Yonghong Song
@ 2023-01-18 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-23 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2023-01-18 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang
Cc: andrii, mykolal, ast, daniel, martin.lau, song, yhs,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, lorenzo, bpf,
linux-kernel
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:56:44 +0800 you wrote:
> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
>
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>
> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> ^
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/92afc5329a5b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-01-18 7:56 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m Tiezhu Yang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2023-01-23 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-01-29 6:25 ` Tiezhu Yang
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2023-01-23 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
Lorenzo Bianconi, bpf, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:57 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
>
> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>
> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> ^
> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
>
> Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
> in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
> ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
> Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
>
> Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> index 227e85e..9fc603c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ __be16 dport = 0;
> int test_exist_lookup = -ENOENT;
> u32 test_exist_lookup_mark = 0;
>
> +enum nf_nat_manip_type___local {
> + NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local,
> + NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local
> +};
> +
> struct nf_conn;
>
> struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
> @@ -58,7 +63,7 @@ int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> int bpf_ct_set_nat_info(struct nf_conn *, union nf_inet_addr *,
> - int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type) __ksym;
> + int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type___local) __ksym;
>
> static __always_inline void
> nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
> @@ -157,10 +162,10 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>
> /* snat */
> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
> /* dnat */
> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
>
it would be a bit more reliable if you used `bpf_core_enum_value(enum
nf_nat_manip_type___local, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local)`. That would make
libbpf substitute correct absolute value, if actual enum
nf_nat_manip_type in kernel ever changed. Please consider a follow up
patch for this.
> ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
> if (ct_ins) {
> --
> 2.1.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-01-23 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2023-01-29 6:25 ` Tiezhu Yang
2023-02-03 22:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2023-01-29 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
Lorenzo Bianconi, bpf, linux-kernel
On 01/24/2023 07:17 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:57 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
>> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
>>
>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>>
>> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
>> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
>> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
>> ^
>> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
>> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
>> ^
>> 2 errors generated.
>>
>> Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
>> in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
>> ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
>> Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
>>
>> Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> index 227e85e..9fc603c 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ __be16 dport = 0;
>> int test_exist_lookup = -ENOENT;
>> u32 test_exist_lookup_mark = 0;
>>
>> +enum nf_nat_manip_type___local {
>> + NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local,
>> + NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local
>> +};
>> +
>> struct nf_conn;
>>
>> struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
>> @@ -58,7 +63,7 @@ int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
>> int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
>> int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
>> int bpf_ct_set_nat_info(struct nf_conn *, union nf_inet_addr *,
>> - int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type) __ksym;
>> + int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type___local) __ksym;
>>
>> static __always_inline void
>> nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>> @@ -157,10 +162,10 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>>
>> /* snat */
>> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
>> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
>> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
>> /* dnat */
>> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
>> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
>> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
>>
>
> it would be a bit more reliable if you used `bpf_core_enum_value(enum
> nf_nat_manip_type___local, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local)`. That would make
> libbpf substitute correct absolute value, if actual enum
> nf_nat_manip_type in kernel ever changed. Please consider a follow up
> patch for this.
Sorry for the late reply, I tested the code as your suggestion, but it
failed.
failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
Is it necessary to send a follow patch now? Thank you.
Here are the test results.
(1) bpf_nf passed with the current code if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m:
[root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
#16/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:OK
#16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:OK
#16/3 bpf_nf/alloc_release:OK
#16/4 bpf_nf/insert_insert:OK
#16/5 bpf_nf/lookup_insert:OK
#16/6 bpf_nf/set_timeout_after_insert:OK
#16/7 bpf_nf/set_status_after_insert:OK
#16/8 bpf_nf/change_timeout_after_alloc:OK
#16/9 bpf_nf/change_status_after_alloc:OK
#16/10 bpf_nf/write_not_allowlisted_field:OK
#16 bpf_nf:OK
Summary: 1/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
(2) bpf_nf failed with the following changes if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m:
[yangtiezhu@fedora bpf.git]$ git diff
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
index 9fc603c9d673..f56ba60ab809 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <vmlinux.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
#define EAFNOSUPPORT 97
#define EPROTO 71
@@ -162,10 +163,14 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *,
struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
/* snat */
saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
- bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport,
NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
+ bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport,
+ bpf_core_enum_value(enum
nf_nat_manip_type___local,
+
NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local));
/* dnat */
daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
- bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport,
NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
+ bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport,
+ bpf_core_enum_value(enum
nf_nat_manip_type___local,
+
NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local));
ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
if (ct_ins) {
[root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
...
All error logs:
libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
#16/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:FAIL
libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
217: (bf) r1 = r7 ;
R1_w=ptr_nf_conn___init(ref_obj_id=18,off=0,imm=0)
R7=ptr_nf_conn___init(ref_obj_id=18,off=0,imm=0) refs=18
218: <invalid CO-RE relocation>
failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
processed 170 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states
12 peak_states 12 mark_read 2
-- END PROG LOAD LOG --
libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': failed to load: -22
libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
#16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:FAIL
#16 bpf_nf:FAIL
Summary: 0/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
Thanks,
Tiezhu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-01-29 6:25 ` Tiezhu Yang
@ 2023-02-03 22:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-06 12:55 ` Tiezhu Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2023-02-03 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
Lorenzo Bianconi, bpf, linux-kernel
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 10:25 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/24/2023 07:17 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:57 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
> >>
> >> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
> >> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
> >>
> >> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> >>
> >> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
> >> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
> >> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> >> ^
> >> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
> >> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> >> ^
> >> 2 errors generated.
> >>
> >> Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
> >> in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
> >> ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
> >> Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
> >>
> >> Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
> >> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> >> ---
> >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> >> index 227e85e..9fc603c 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ __be16 dport = 0;
> >> int test_exist_lookup = -ENOENT;
> >> u32 test_exist_lookup_mark = 0;
> >>
> >> +enum nf_nat_manip_type___local {
> >> + NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local,
> >> + NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> struct nf_conn;
> >>
> >> struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
> >> @@ -58,7 +63,7 @@ int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> >> int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> >> int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
> >> int bpf_ct_set_nat_info(struct nf_conn *, union nf_inet_addr *,
> >> - int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type) __ksym;
> >> + int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type___local) __ksym;
> >>
> >> static __always_inline void
> >> nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
> >> @@ -157,10 +162,10 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
> >>
> >> /* snat */
> >> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> >> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> >> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
> >> /* dnat */
> >> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> >> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
> >> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
> >>
> >
> > it would be a bit more reliable if you used `bpf_core_enum_value(enum
> > nf_nat_manip_type___local, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local)`. That would make
> > libbpf substitute correct absolute value, if actual enum
> > nf_nat_manip_type in kernel ever changed. Please consider a follow up
> > patch for this.
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I tested the code as your suggestion, but it
> failed.
>
> failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
> nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
Was nf_conntrack kernel module loaded at the time when you ran the
test? If yes, what's the output of
bpftool btf dump file /sys/kernel/btf/nf_conntrack | grep nf_nat_manip_type
?
>
> Is it necessary to send a follow patch now? Thank you.
>
> Here are the test results.
>
> (1) bpf_nf passed with the current code if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m:
>
> [root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
> #16/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:OK
> #16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:OK
> #16/3 bpf_nf/alloc_release:OK
> #16/4 bpf_nf/insert_insert:OK
> #16/5 bpf_nf/lookup_insert:OK
> #16/6 bpf_nf/set_timeout_after_insert:OK
> #16/7 bpf_nf/set_status_after_insert:OK
> #16/8 bpf_nf/change_timeout_after_alloc:OK
> #16/9 bpf_nf/change_status_after_alloc:OK
> #16/10 bpf_nf/write_not_allowlisted_field:OK
> #16 bpf_nf:OK
> Summary: 1/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> (2) bpf_nf failed with the following changes if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m:
>
> [yangtiezhu@fedora bpf.git]$ git diff
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> index 9fc603c9d673..f56ba60ab809 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #include <vmlinux.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
>
> #define EAFNOSUPPORT 97
> #define EPROTO 71
> @@ -162,10 +163,14 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *,
> struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>
> /* snat */
> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport,
> NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport,
> + bpf_core_enum_value(enum
> nf_nat_manip_type___local,
> +
> NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local));
> /* dnat */
> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport,
> NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport,
> + bpf_core_enum_value(enum
> nf_nat_manip_type___local,
> +
> NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local));
>
> ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
> if (ct_ins) {
>
> [root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
> ...
> All error logs:
> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> ...
> libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
> libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
> test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
> #16/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:FAIL
> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> ...
> 217: (bf) r1 = r7 ;
> R1_w=ptr_nf_conn___init(ref_obj_id=18,off=0,imm=0)
> R7=ptr_nf_conn___init(ref_obj_id=18,off=0,imm=0) refs=18
> 218: <invalid CO-RE relocation>
> failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
> nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
> processed 170 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states
> 12 peak_states 12 mark_read 2
> -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': failed to load: -22
> libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
> libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
> test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
> #16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:FAIL
> #16 bpf_nf:FAIL
> Summary: 0/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
>
> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
2023-02-03 22:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2023-02-06 12:55 ` Tiezhu Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2023-02-06 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Mykola Lysenko, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
Lorenzo Bianconi, bpf, linux-kernel
On 02/04/2023 06:16 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 10:25 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/24/2023 07:17 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:57 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m, there are no definitions of NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
>>>> and NF_NAT_MANIP_DST in vmlinux.h, build test_bpf_nf.c failed.
>>>>
>>>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>>>>
>>>> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] test_bpf_nf.bpf.o
>>>> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:160:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC'
>>>> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
>>>> ^
>>>> progs/test_bpf_nf.c:163:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST'
>>>> bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
>>>> ^
>>>> 2 errors generated.
>>>>
>>>> Copy the definitions in include/net/netfilter/nf_nat.h to test_bpf_nf.c,
>>>> in order to avoid redefinitions if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y, rename them with
>>>> ___local suffix. This is similar with commit 1058b6a78db2 ("selftests/bpf:
>>>> Do not fail build if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n").
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: b06b45e82b59 ("selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>>>> index 227e85e..9fc603c 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ __be16 dport = 0;
>>>> int test_exist_lookup = -ENOENT;
>>>> u32 test_exist_lookup_mark = 0;
>>>>
>>>> +enum nf_nat_manip_type___local {
>>>> + NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local,
>>>> + NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> struct nf_conn;
>>>>
>>>> struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
>>>> @@ -58,7 +63,7 @@ int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
>>>> int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
>>>> int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
>>>> int bpf_ct_set_nat_info(struct nf_conn *, union nf_inet_addr *,
>>>> - int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type) __ksym;
>>>> + int port, enum nf_nat_manip_type___local) __ksym;
>>>>
>>>> static __always_inline void
>>>> nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>>>> @@ -157,10 +162,10 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>>>>
>>>> /* snat */
>>>> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
>>>> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
>>>> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
>>>> /* dnat */
>>>> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
>>>> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
>>>> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
>>>>
>>>
>>> it would be a bit more reliable if you used `bpf_core_enum_value(enum
>>> nf_nat_manip_type___local, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local)`. That would make
>>> libbpf substitute correct absolute value, if actual enum
>>> nf_nat_manip_type in kernel ever changed. Please consider a follow up
>>> patch for this.
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply, I tested the code as your suggestion, but it
>> failed.
>>
>> failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
>> nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
>
>
> Was nf_conntrack kernel module loaded at the time when you ran the
> test? If yes, what's the output of
Yes, nf_conntrack was loaded when ran the test.
[root@fedora bpf]# lsmod | grep -w nf_conntrack
nf_conntrack 188416 4
nf_nat,nft_ct,nf_conntrack_netbios_ns,nf_conntrack_broadcast
nf_defrag_ipv6 24576 1 nf_conntrack
nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack
[root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
...
218: <invalid CO-RE relocation>
failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
processed 170 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states
12 peak_states 12 mark_read 2
-- END PROG LOAD LOG --
libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': failed to load: -22
libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
#16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:FAIL
#16 bpf_nf:FAIL
Summary: 0/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
>
> bpftool btf dump file /sys/kernel/btf/nf_conntrack | grep nf_nat_manip_type
>
> ?
>
[root@fedora bpf]# ./bpftool btf dump file /sys/kernel/btf/nf_conntrack
| grep nf_nat_manip_type
[130070] ENUM 'nf_nat_manip_type' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=2
[root@fedora bpf]# ./bpftool btf dump file /sys/kernel/btf/nf_conntrack
| grep NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC
'NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC' val=0
[root@fedora bpf]# ./bpftool btf dump file /sys/kernel/btf/nf_conntrack
| grep NF_NAT_MANIP_DST
'NF_NAT_MANIP_DST' val=1
Thanks,
Tiezhu
>>
>> Is it necessary to send a follow patch now? Thank you.
>>
>> Here are the test results.
>>
>> (1) bpf_nf passed with the current code if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m:
>>
>> [root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
>> #16/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:OK
>> #16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:OK
>> #16/3 bpf_nf/alloc_release:OK
>> #16/4 bpf_nf/insert_insert:OK
>> #16/5 bpf_nf/lookup_insert:OK
>> #16/6 bpf_nf/set_timeout_after_insert:OK
>> #16/7 bpf_nf/set_status_after_insert:OK
>> #16/8 bpf_nf/change_timeout_after_alloc:OK
>> #16/9 bpf_nf/change_status_after_alloc:OK
>> #16/10 bpf_nf/write_not_allowlisted_field:OK
>> #16 bpf_nf:OK
>> Summary: 1/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>>
>> (2) bpf_nf failed with the following changes if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m:
>>
>> [yangtiezhu@fedora bpf.git]$ git diff
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> index 9fc603c9d673..f56ba60ab809 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> #include <vmlinux.h>
>> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>> #include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
>>
>> #define EAFNOSUPPORT 97
>> #define EPROTO 71
>> @@ -162,10 +163,14 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *,
>> struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>>
>> /* snat */
>> saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
>> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport,
>> NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
>> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport,
>> + bpf_core_enum_value(enum
>> nf_nat_manip_type___local,
>> +
>> NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local));
>> /* dnat */
>> daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
>> - bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport,
>> NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
>> + bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport,
>> + bpf_core_enum_value(enum
>> nf_nat_manip_type___local,
>> +
>> NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local));
>>
>> ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
>> if (ct_ins) {
>>
>> [root@fedora bpf]# ./test_progs -a bpf_nf
>> ...
>> All error logs:
>> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
>> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
>> ...
>> libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
>> libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
>> test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
>> #16/1 bpf_nf/xdp-ct:FAIL
>> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
>> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
>> ...
>> 217: (bf) r1 = r7 ;
>> R1_w=ptr_nf_conn___init(ref_obj_id=18,off=0,imm=0)
>> R7=ptr_nf_conn___init(ref_obj_id=18,off=0,imm=0) refs=18
>> 218: <invalid CO-RE relocation>
>> failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <enumval_value> [101] enum
>> nf_nat_manip_type___local::NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local = 0
>> processed 170 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states
>> 12 peak_states 12 mark_read 2
>> -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
>> libbpf: prog 'nf_xdp_ct_test': failed to load: -22
>> libbpf: failed to load object 'test_bpf_nf'
>> libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_bpf_nf': -22
>> test_bpf_nf_ct:FAIL:test_bpf_nf__open_and_load unexpected error: -22
>> #16/2 bpf_nf/tc-bpf-ct:FAIL
>> #16 bpf_nf:FAIL
>> Summary: 0/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tiezhu
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-06 12:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-18 7:56 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Fix build errors if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m Tiezhu Yang
2023-01-18 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-01-18 19:42 ` Yonghong Song
2023-01-18 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-23 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-01-29 6:25 ` Tiezhu Yang
2023-02-03 22:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-06 12:55 ` Tiezhu Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).