From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@oss.nxp.com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
"S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: Don't set platform name when of_node is set
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:59:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZDe_Q-N7L_7z7aVz1o3guKd6R+WFrOfT9KPbggJP8SPZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210312104931.GA5348@sirena.org.uk>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:32:54AM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:38 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > > + if (!dai_link->platforms->of_node)
> > > > + dai_link->platforms->name = component->name;
>
> > > Why would we prefer the node name over something explicitly configured?
>
> > Not sure I follow your question. I think the difference stands in the
> > way we treat OF vs non-OF platforms.
>
> If an explicit name has been provided why would we override it with an
> autogenerated one?
Wait, are you asking why the initial code:
dai_link->platforms->name = component->name;
is there in the initial code?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-12 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 8:23 [PATCH] ASoC: core: Don't set platform name when of_node is set Daniel Baluta
2021-03-09 15:34 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-12 8:32 ` Daniel Baluta
2021-03-12 10:49 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-12 10:59 ` Daniel Baluta [this message]
2021-03-12 11:57 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-12 12:37 ` Daniel Baluta
2021-03-12 14:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-17 8:48 ` Daniel Baluta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEnQRZDe_Q-N7L_7z7aVz1o3guKd6R+WFrOfT9KPbggJP8SPZw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).